Bedtime Stories in the Industry 4.0 Era: A Descriptive Study of Parents’ Practices and Perceptions in Pontianak

Authors

  • Siska Perdina Faculty of Education and Educational Sciences, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Puja Maulidia Faculty of Education and Educational Sciences, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/mimbar.v42i2.49307

Keywords:

Bedtime Stories, Era 4.0, Early Childhood

Abstract

This study examines the relevance of bedtime stories in early childhood families in the Industry 4.0 era, where digital media increasingly influences literacy practices at home. Using a descriptive mixed-method design (survey of 30 parents and semi-structured interviews), this study describes how often families engage in bedtime stories, the media they use, and their perceptions of the benefits of this practice. The results show variations in consistency in practice, with 37% of parents doing it regularly (≥3 times per week) and 33% occasionally (1-2 times per week), while 13% reported never doing it. The majority, 60% of parents use printed picture books as their primary medium, followed by digital story videos (30%). Regarding perceived benefits, most parents rated bedtime stories as very beneficial for improving vocabulary and language skills (87%) and strengthening emotional bonds (50%). Interview data reinforced these findings, while highlighting a decline in reading routines due to parental fatigue or limited time (67%) and children’s preference for gadgets (40%) as key challenges. This study implies the need for school-family collaboration, such as providing weekly reading guides, and recommends the development of parent-supported to maintain interactive literacy practices in modern families.

References

Aerila, J., & Kauppinen, M. (2023). Parents’ experiences of a family literacy program in Finland. European Journal of Education, 58(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ejed.2023.58.2

Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.

BERA. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). British Educational Research Association.

Britto, P. R., Lye, S. J., & Proulx, K. (2021). Early childhood development and family literacy practices. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 56(3), 210–222.

Chen, Y., Wang, L., & Liu, T. (2022). Digital read-aloud applications in early literacy development. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 22(4), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jecl.2022.22.4

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076

Hale, L., Berger, L. M., & LeBourgeois, M. K. (2021). Bedtime routines, sleep, and child development. Sleep Health, 7(3), 310–318.

Hutton, J. S., Phelan, K., Horowitz-Kraus, T., & DeWitt, T. (2020). Home reading environment and brain activation in preschool children. Pediatrics, 145(5), e20193994.

Justice, L. M., & Sofka, A. E. (2010). Engaging children with print: Building early literacy skills through quality read-alouds. Guilford Press.

Kucirkova, N. (2021). Children’s reading in the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 13–29.

Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., & Rideout, V. (2020). Young children’s screen time and parental mediation. Journal of Children and Media, 14(2), 193–207.

Lin, N. T. (2023). Young children and families’ home literacy and technology use in the digital era. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 101–112.

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Neumann, M. M. (2020). Young children and screen literacy: Reading on digital devices. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 43(1), 5–18.

Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2019). The role of e-books in fostering emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(4), 489–499.

Noble, K. G., Houston, S. M., Kan, E., & Sowell, E. R. (2021). Family reading and brain development in early childhood. Developmental Science, 24(3), e13078.

Park, H. (2019). Parental education and children’s literacy development. Child Development Research, 2019, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1234567

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

Sénéchal, M., Whissell, J., & Bouchard, L. (2020). Reading aloud at home and children’s emergent literacy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 53(2), 187–200.

Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2014). Continuity and change in family literacy practices: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 85(4), 1552–1568.

Sénéchal, M., & Young, L. (2008). The effect of family literacy interventions on children’s acquisition of reading from kindergarten to grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 880–907.

Sigman, A. (2017). Screen time and human interaction: Implications for child development. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 102(11), 1017–1022.

Strouse, G. A., Nyhout, A., & Ganea, P. A. (2020). The role of book features in parent–child interaction and story comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 576.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2018). Dialogic reading and emergent literacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 57(1), 85–95.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Article (July - December)

How to Cite

Bedtime Stories in the Industry 4.0 Era: A Descriptive Study of Parents’ Practices and Perceptions in Pontianak. (2025). Mimbar Agama Budaya, 42(2), 472-482. https://doi.org/10.15408/mimbar.v42i2.49307