When Women Disrupt Prayer? Rethinking a Controversial Hadith through Al-Adlabi’s Matan Criticism

Authors

  • Muhammad Fadhil Wathani Faculty of Ushuluddin and Humanities, Walisongo State Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0286-755X
  • Ahmad Musyafiq Faculty of Ushuluddin and Humanities, Walisongo State Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2553-4802
  • Nikmah Rochmawati Faculty of Psychology and Health, Walisongo State Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4956-884X
  • Mahadi Rahman Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia
  • Zufriyatun Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v14i2.46533

Keywords:

Criticism of Matan, Hadith, Women, Prayer, al-Adlabi

Abstract

The hadith that mentions women, donkeys, and dogs can cancel prayers when passing in front of people who pray has caused controversy, mainly because it is considered to contain gender bias. This study aims to examine the validity of the matan hadith through the approach of matan criticism according to al-Adlabi in Manhaj Naqd al-Matn 'Inda 'Ulamā' al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī. The method employed is a literature study that involves tracing the hadith in al-Kutub al-Tis'ah and analyzing it based on four criteria: conformity with the Qur'an, sahih hadith, the Prophet's sirah, rationality, and historical context, as well as editorial feasibility. The results of the analysis show that, although the sanad of the hadith is considered authentic, it contains problems: it is not in line with the Qur'an, it contradicts Aisha's history and the Prophet's practice, and it juxtaposes women with animals in the context of worship. This study emphasizes the importance of critically analyzing the hadith so that our understanding of it remains in harmony with the values of justice, common sense, and humanity in Islam.

References

Al-Adlabi, S. I. A. (1983). Manhaj Naqd al-Matn ‘inda ‘Ulamâ al-Hadîts al-Nabawî. Dâr al-Ifaq al Jadîdah.

Al-Bukhārī, M. ibn I. (2000). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Dār Ibn Kathīr.

Al-Ḥajjāj, M. ibn. (1991). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Tahqīq Muḥammad Fu’ād ‘Abd al-Bāqī. Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.

Al-Jawziyyah, I. Q. (1970). al-Manār al-Munīf fī al-Ṣaḥīḥ wa al-Ḍa‘īf. Maktabah al-Qāhirah.

Al-Sijistānī, A. D. (2009). Sunan Abī Dāwūd. Dār al-Fikr.

Anggraeni, L. (2024). Misogynistic hadith : Critical analysis of fatima mernissi ’ s hermeneutical method. Humanistika: Jurnal Keislaman, 10(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55210/humanistika.v10i2.1778

Anshori, M. (2016). Kajian Ketersambungan Sanad (Ittişāl Al-Sanad). Jurnal Living Hadis, 1(2), 294. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2016.1123

Baharuddin, M. A. (2014). Visi-Misi Ma’ânî al-H?adîth dalam Wacana Studi H?adîth. Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman, 2(2), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.52431/tafaqquh.v2i2.29

Fata, Z., Hidayat, M. S., & Sahidin, A. (2023). Dialektika Teks dan Konteks dalam Framework Pemahaman Hadis. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 7(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5002

Hamisan@khair, N. S. (2022). Contextualising Arguments on Deficiency of Women’s Intelligence and Religion: Analytical Study on the Prophetic Traditions. Akademika, 92(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2022-9202-04

Ḥanbal, A. ibn. (2001). Musnad Aḥmad, Mu’assasat al-Risālah, tahqīq: Shu‘ayb al-Arna’ūṭ.

Hikmah, N., Pangestu, S. A., & Luthfia, N. (2023). Analisis Kriteria Kesahihan Matan dalam Hadis : Kajian Teori dan Metodologi. Journal of Hadith Studies, 6, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v6i2-02

Irfan, M. M. (2020). Perempuan Sebagai Pembatal Salat: Studi Atas Pandangan Nasr Ad-Din a-Albani Dan Fatima Mernissi. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v8i1.2211

Kholishuddin, K. (2020). Penggunaan Pendekatan Maqasid Shari’ah Sebagai Instrumen Kontekstualisasi Makna Hadis. Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies, 1(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.55987/njhs.v1i1.4

Maihula, J. S., & Abdulkadir, M. M. (2022). In-depth Analysis on the Methodology of Sanad and MatanCriticisms: The Perspective of Hadith Scholars. IAR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(01), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjhss.2022.v03i01.008

Mājah, I. (2004). Sunan Ibn Mājah. Dār Iḥyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah.

Muhammad Habib Zainul Huda. (2022). Intertekstualitas Hadis Perempuan Shalat Berjamaah Di Masjid. Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Philosophy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22515/ajipp.v3i1.5053

Musyafiq, A., & Nur, Q. (2004). Salahudin ibn Ahmad al Adlabi, Metodologi Kritik Matan Hadis. Gaya Media Pratama.

Mutammimah, B., Husni, M., & Sumbulah, U. (2023). Hadith Authentication Method: Concept, Application and Critique of Orientalist Skepticism. Religia, 26(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v26i1.863

RI, K. A. (2019). Al-Qur’an dan terjemahannya.

Ridwan, M. (2023). Pemahaman Hadis Sutrah dalam Shalat: Tanggapan terhadap Kaum Feminis yang Keberatan dengan “Binatang dan Wanita itu Sederajat.” Jurnal Riset Agama, 3(1), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v3i1.20544

Rofiq, M. (2015). Memahami Hadis Misoginis Perspektif Maqasid Syari‘AH: Studi Hadis yang Menyamakan antara Keledai, Anjing dan Perempuan. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 16(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v16i1.986

Siregar, I. (2018). Kritik Kontekstualisasi Pemahaman Hadis M. Syuhudi Ismail. TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 2(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v2i1.8075

Suparman, T. N. A., & Kosasih, E. (2025). Analisis Kaidah-Kaidah Sanad Hadits Dari Aspek Rawi: Identitas Rawi. Tashdiq: Jurnal Kajian Agama Islam, 10(2), 1–2. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3783/tashdiqv2i9.2461

Syafi, M. (2011). Bangunan Masjid Pada Masa Nabi Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Jamaah Masjid Perempuan. Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2011.101.89-106

Syaikhudin, S. (2011). Perempuan Yang Membatalkan Shalat. Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam, 10(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2011.101.107-121

Tangngareng, T. (2016). METHODOLOGY OF HADITH CONTENT CRITICISM: A Study on the Thought of Salah al-Din bin Ahmad al-Adlabi. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 17(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v17i1.1281

Umam, K., Bustomi, M. Y., & Maulana, A. (2024). Kesetaraan Gender dalam Al-Qur’an dan Hadis: Meluruskan Pemahaman Nash Misoginis. Tadabbur: Jurnal Integrasi Keilmuan, 3(01), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.15408/tadabbur.v3i01.41458

Yunita, Y. (2016). Fatima Mernissi Dan Simbol Perlawanan Terhapad Hadith- Hadith Misoginis (Kajian Terhadap Pandangan Fatima Mernissi mengenai Hadith “Wanita, Anjing dan Keledai Membatalkan Shalat ” riwayat AbÅ« Hurairah). Dialogia, 13(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v13i1.276

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

When Women Disrupt Prayer? Rethinking a Controversial Hadith through Al-Adlabi’s Matan Criticism. (2024). JOURNAL OF QUR’AN AND HADITH STUDIES, 14(2), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v14i2.46533