Bawaslu Institution and Its Contribution in Resolving Election Disputes

Afrinal Afrinal, Nur Rohim Yunus, Fitria Esfandiari

Abstract


Elections are an important aspect of democracy, and their success depends largely on the integrity and transparency of the process. In the Indonesian context, the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) plays a major role in supervising and resolving election disputes. This article explores Bawaslu's key role in resolving election disputes and its contribution to democratic stability in Indonesia. This research aims to identify the positive impact of dispute resolution by Bawaslu on the general election process and public trust. This research uses qualitative research methods with a literature approach and a statutory regulations approach. Data was obtained from various sources, including related literature, laws and regulations related to elections, and official Bawaslu documents. This research concludes that Bawaslu has a very important role in resolving election disputes in Indonesia. By using transparent and fair research methods, Bawaslu helps maintain the integrity of general elections, overcome disagreements, and increase public confidence in election results. Bawaslu's contribution is not only in resolving disputes but also in strengthening the democratic system in Indonesia. This means that Bawaslu also produces valuable learning experiences for stakeholders, including political parties, election organizers and civil society, to improve the general election process in the future.

Keywords: Bawaslu; Dispute resolution; Election

 

Abstrak

Pemilihan umum merupakan aspek penting dalam demokrasi, dan keberhasilannya sangat bergantung pada integritas dan transparansi prosesnya. Dalam konteks Indonesia, Badan Pengawas Pemilu (Bawaslu) memegang peran utama dalam mengawasi dan menyelesaikan sengketa pemilu. Artikel ini mengeksplorasi peran kunci Bawaslu dalam mengatasi sengketa pemilu dan kontribusinya terhadap stabilitas demokrasi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dampak positif penyelesaian sengketa oleh Bawaslu terhadap proses pemilihan umum dan kepercayaan publik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan literatur dan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Data diperoleh dari berbagai sumber, termasuk literatur terkait, peraturan perundang-undangan terkait pemilu, dan dokumen resmi Bawaslu. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Bawaslu memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam penyelesaian sengketa pemilu di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yang transparan dan adil, Bawaslu membantu menjaga integritas pemilihan umum, mengatasi ketidaksetujuan, dan meningkatkan kepercayaan publik terhadap hasil pemilu. Kontribusi Bawaslu bukan hanya dalam menyelesaikan sengketa tetapi juga dalam memperkuat sistem demokratis di Indonesia. Artinya, Bawaslu juga menghasilkan pengalaman pembelajaran yang berharga bagi pemangku kepentingan, termasuk partai politik, penyelenggara pemilu, dan masyarakat sipil, untuk meningkatkan proses pemilihan umum di masa depan.

Kata Kunci: Bawaslu; Penyelesaian Sengketa; Pemilu

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alvian, M. A. (2022). Eksistensi Bawaslu Dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional. JURNAL SULTAN: Riset Hukum Tata Negara, 1(1), 21-26.

Anggraeniko, L. S., & Sutarno, S. (2022). Rekomendasi Bawaslu Sebagai Bentuk Progresivitas Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Pemilu. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 5(1), 254-261.

Blais, A. (2006). What Affects Voter Turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111-125.

Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press.

Elklit, J., & Reynolds, A. (2002). The International Community's Role in Election Monitoring: The Carter Center in Zambia and Nicaragua. Democratization, 9(3), 36-55.

Elklit, J., & Reynolds, A. (2005). The Impact of Election Administration on the Legitimacy of Emerging Democracies: A New Comparative Politics Research Agenda. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 43(3), 231-257.

Huda, N. (2009). Indonesia: The Role of Bawaslu in Election Dispute Resolution. In Electoral Management Design (pp. 209-236). Springer.

Hyde, S. D. (2011). The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics, 63(1), 1-37.

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press.

Kasper M. Hansen dan Anne Elizabeth Dunning. (2017). Election Watchdogs: Transparency, Accountability, and Integrity". Oxford University Press.

Kuncoro, A. (2009). Indonesian Election Commission's Role in Democratization. Election Monitoring in Southeast Asia: Election Commission in Indonesia and Thailand, 41-72.

Kusuma, A. B. (2004). Reformasi Pemilu dan Tata Kelola Politik di Indonesia. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Leslie Holmes. (2009). "Electoral Malpractice". Oxford University Press.

Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.

López Pintor, R., Nai, A., and Magaloni, B. (2011). Ballot Secrecy and Coercion under International Oversight: Evidence from Nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 68-80.

Matthew S. Shugart dan Rein Taagepera. (2017). "Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across New and Established Democracies". Oxford University Press.

Mietzner, M. (2009). Contested Elections and Democratization in Indonesia's Post-Soeharto Era. South East Asia Research, 17(2), 293-318.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage.

Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.

Norris, P. (2014). Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge University Press.

Nurdin, M. (2019). Eksistensi Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) dalam Penegakan Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu. Veritas, 5(2), 1-17.

Pippa Norris dan Richard W. Frank. (2014). "Electoral Integrity and Political Regimes". Oxford University Press.

Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., & Manin, B. (2000). Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge University Press.

Schedler, A. (2013). Elections without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 24(3), 143-157.

Seac, A. E. F. (2022). Penguatan Bawaslu Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pemilu. Fianosa Publishing.

Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. Sage.

Tomsa, D. (2008). The Limits of Electoral Authoritarianism in Indonesia. The Pacific Review, 21(2), 203-224.

Regulations:

Peraturan KPU No. 13 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pengawasan Pemilu oleh Bawaslu.

Peraturan KPU No. 14 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Kerja Sama KPU dengan Bawaslu dalam Pengawasan Pemilihan Umum. Peraturan Bawaslu (sesuai dengan peraturan-peraturan yang berlaku pada saat ini).

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 15 Tahun 2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.

Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum (UU Pemilu).

UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu. (2017). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2017, No. 49, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6029.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v10i5.34803 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.