Independent Creation Sebagai Salah Satu Dalil Untuk Membantah Tuduhan Peniruan Ciptaan
Abstract
Similarities or copyright infringement often occur, resulting in disputes. This is based on the fact that many people have copyrighted works that are identical or substantially similar to other people's works, whether intentional or not. For this matter, there were accusations of copyright infringement and a lawsuit was filed because the plaintiff felt that his rights had been violated. In this case, independent creation can act as a disputing argument and defence for the defendant in the context of the defence of the accusation of copyright infringement, namely by proving that the imitation was not carried out because the work was created independently by the defendant. Based on this, this article attempts to analyze the application of independent creation as an argument to refute allegations of copyright infringement by making comparisons with systems in Indonesia, the Netherlands and the United States, as well as setting criteria in resolving the refutation of accusations of copyright infringement. This research was conducted through normative juridical research and conducted a literature study and comparison with the legal system in the United States and the Netherlands.
Keywords: independent creation, copyright, copyright infringement, copyright law protection, copyright law violation
Abstrak
Kemiripan maupun pelanggaran dalam hak cipta seringkali terjadi hingga mengakibatkan adanya sengketa. Hal ini didasari oleh banyak orang yang memiliki karya cipta yang identik maupun mirip secara subtansial dengan karya orang lain baik disengaja ataupun tidak. Atas hal tersebut maka terjadi tuduhan atas pelanggaran hak cipta berupa peniruan ciptaan dan gugatan yang diajukan karena penggugat merasa haknya dilanggar. Dalam hal ini, independent creation dapat berperan sebagai dalil pembantah dan pembelaan bagi tergugat dalam rangka pembelaan atas tuduhan peniruan ciptaan yakni dengan membuktikan bahwa peniruan tersebut tidak dilakukan karena karya diciptakan secara independen oleh tergugat. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, artikel ini mencoba untuk menganalisa penerapan mengenai independent creation sebagai dalil untuk membantah tuduhan peniruan ciptaan dengan melakukan perbandingan dengan sistem di Indonesia, Belanda dan Amerika Serikat, dan serta penetapan kriteria dalam penyelesaian pembatahan tuduhan peniruaan ciptaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui penelitian yuridis normatif dan melakukan studi kepustakaan serta perbandingan dengan sistem hukum di Amerika Serikat dan Belanda.
Kata kunci: independent creation, hak cipta, pelanggaran hak cipta, perlindungan hukum hak cipta, pelanggaran hukum hak cipta
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku
Djumhana, Muhamad dan R. Djubaedillah. Hak Milik Intelektual: Sejarah, Teori, dan Prakteknya di Indonesia. Ed. 1. Cet. 3. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.
Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Cet. 13. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Hozumi, Tamotsu. Asian Copyright Handbook Indonesian Version. Ed. 1. Cet. 1. Jakarta: Ikatan Penerbit Indonesia (IKAPI), 2006.
Maulana, Insan Budi. Bianglala HAKI (Hak Kekayaan Intelektual). Ed. 1. Cet. 1. Jakarta: PT Hecca Mitra Utama, 2005.
Saidin, H. Ok. Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Ed. 6. Jakarta: PT Grajafindo Persada, 2007.
Usman, Rachmadi. Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual: Perlindungan dan Dimensi Hukumnya di Indonesia. Ed. 1. Cet. 1. Bandung: PT Alumni, 2003.
Jurnal
Abrams, Howard B. “Originality and Creativity in Copyright Law,” Law and Contemporary Problems. Vol. 55. No. 2 (1992).
Christie, Andrew F. “Copyright Protection For Ideas: An Appraisal Of The Traditional View,” Monash University Law Review. Vol. 10. (Desember 1984).
Loren, Lydia Pallas dan R. Anthony Reese, “Proving Infringement: Burdens of Proof in Copyright Infringement Litigation” Lewis & Clark Law Review. Vol. 23. No. 2. (23 September 2019).
Pahlck, Harold Eric. "Independent Creation Defense and Patent Law" Law School Student Scholarship. Vol. 282 (1 Mei 2013).
Sandler, Jonathan Richard. "Idea Theft and Independent Creation: A Recipe for Evading Contractual Obligations," Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. Vol. 45. No. 4 (2012).
Skirpan, Rebecca. "An Argument that Independent Creation is as likely as Subconscious Copying in Music Infringement Cases" Law School Student Scholarship. Vol. 112. (2013).
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. LN No. 266 Tahun 2014, TLN No. 5599.
Netherlands. The Dutch Copyright Act (Auteurswet).
United States. Historical and Revision Notes House Report No. 94-1476.
United States. 17 U.S. Code § 102.
Internet/Pranala Luar
Buchwald, Steven “Independent Creation Paper Trail To Fend Off Copyright Suits” https://buchwaldlaw.com/2014/03/independent-creation-copyright/. Diakses pada 25 November 2021.
Company Ninja, “Analysis of Doctrine of Sweat dan Brow and Doctrine of Independent Creation” https://thecompany.ninja/analysis-of-doctrine-of-sweat-and-brow-and-doctrine-of-independent-creation/. Diakses pada 15 November 2015.
European Parliamentary Research Service, “Copyright Law in the EU: Salient Features of Copyright Law Across The EU Member States” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/625126/EPRS_STU(2018)625126_EN.pdf. Diakses pada 23 November 2021.
FindLaw: Case Law, United States, “Fogerty v. MGM Group Holding Corp Inc” https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-6th-circuit/1380062.html. Diakses pada 20 November 2021.
IP-Med. “The Rights of A Copyright Owner: Infringement” http://www.ip-med.net/sites/default/files/pawan%20Lecture_3_copyright.pdf. Diakses pada 25 November 2021.
James & Wells. “Copyright Infringement – An Overview” https://www.jamesandwells.com/resource/copyright-infringement-an-overview-2/. Diakses pada 25 November 2021.
Khan, Injila “Analysis of Doctrine of Sweat and Brow and Doctrine of Independent Creation” https://thecompany.ninja/analysis-of-doctrine-of-sweat-and-brow-and-doctrine-of-independent-creation/#Doctrine_of_Independent_Creation. Diakses pada 23 November 2021.
Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School, “Prima Facie” Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/prima_facie. Diakses pada 23 November 2021.
Rijsdijk, Michiel dan Marlies Wiegerinck, “Copyright Litigation in The Netherlands: Overview” https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-011-6359?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true. Diakses pada 25 November 2021.
University of Michigan Library, “Copyright Basis” https://guides.lib.umich.edu/copyrightbasics/copyrightability. Diakses pada 23 November 2021.
Dokumen Internasional
Berne Convention for the Protection of Literay an Artistic Works. Dirafitikasi oleh Indonesia melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 18 Tahun 1997 pada 7 Mei 1997 dan berlaku pada tanggal 5 September 1997.
World Intellectual Property Organization. WIPO Copyrights Treaty. Diratifikasi melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 19 Tahun 1997 pada 7 Mei 1997.
World Intellectual Property Organization. WIPO Perfomances and Phonogram Treaty (WPPT). Diratifikasi melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 74 Tahun 2004 pada 10 September 2004.
World Trade Organization. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v8i6.23377 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.