Epistemologi Eskatologi dalam Hikmah al-Isyrāq: Rekonstruksi Konsep Jiwa Pasca-Kematian Menurut Suhrawardī al-Maqtūl

Authors

  • Asyraf Malik UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Ayu Lestari UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Wawan Kurniawan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/paradigma.v7i2.46909

Keywords:

Suhrawardī al-Maqtūl, eschatology, Hikmat al-Ishrāq, soul, intuitive epistemology

Abstract

Existing studies on Suhrawardī's eschatology have largely focused on the soul and the afterlife, while comparatively little attention has been paid to the epistemological foundation underlying his eschatological thought. This article examines Suhrawardī al-Maqtūl's concept of eschatology by focusing on the relationship between the post-mortem condition of the soul, resurrection, and the epistemological method through which eschatological realities are understood. Employing qualitative library research and textual analysis of Suhrawardī's major works and relevant scholarship on Hikmat al-Ishrāq, the study demonstrates that Suhrawardī classifies the post-mortem condition of the soul into three categories: syaqāwah, su‘adā’ (or zuhhād), and muta’allihīn (or muqaddasīn). These conditions are associated with imaginal forms (al-ṣuwar al-mithāliyyah) that serve as the medium through which the soul manifests in the event of resurrection. The study further argues that Suhrawardī's eschatology is grounded primarily in intuitive (ishrāqī) epistemology rather than demonstrative (burhānī) reasoning, making illuminative knowledge the principal framework for understanding the afterlife. This finding suggests that Suhrawardī's eschatology should be understood not merely as a metaphysical doctrine of the hereafter but as an integral consequence of the epistemological structure of Hikmat al-Ishrāq.

References

Arifin, Yanuar. Suhrawardī. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press, 2024.

Bagus, Lorens. Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1996.

Bakhtiar, Amsal. Filsafat Agama: Wisata Pemikiran dan Kepercayaan Manusia. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2017.

Chittick, William C. The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn al-'Arabi's Metaphysics of Imagination. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989.

Corbin, Henry. History of Islamic Philosophy. London: Kegan Paul International, 1993.

———. "Mundus Imaginalis, or the Imaginary and the Imaginal." Spring (1972): 1–19.

———. Spiritual Body and Celestial Earth: From Mazdean Iran to Shi'ite Iran. Translated by Nancy Pearson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.

Fakhry, Majid. Sejarah Filsafat Islam. Diterjemahkan oleh Mulyadhi Kartanegara. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya, 1986.

Faturahman. Filsafat Islam. Bandung: Manggu Makmur Tanjung Lestari, 2020.

Al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Tahāfut al-Falāsifah. Edited by Maurice Bouyges. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1990.

Ibn Rushd. Tahāfut al-Tahāfut. Translated by Simon van den Bergh. London: Luzac, 1954.

Ibn Sīnā. Al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīhāt. Jilid 4. Kairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif, 1960.

Khudori Soleh. Filsafat Islam: Dari Klasik hingga Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2016.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Three Muslim Sages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.

Nasution, Harun. Falsafat Agama. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 2003.

Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī. Sharḥ Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq. Tehran: University of Tehran Press, 2001.

Razavi, Mehdi Amin. Suhrawardī and the School of Illumination. Richmond: Curzon Press, 1997.

Al-Suhrawardī, Yaḥyā ibn Ḥabash Shihāb al-Dīn. The Philosophy of Illumination (Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq). Edited by John Walbridge and Hossein Ziai. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1999.

Walbridge, John. The Leaven of the Ancients: Suhrawardī and the Heritage of the Greeks. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.

Ziai, Hossein. Knowledge and Illumination: A Study of Suhrawardī's Hikmat al-Ishrāq. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Epistemologi Eskatologi dalam Hikmah al-Isyrāq: Rekonstruksi Konsep Jiwa Pasca-Kematian Menurut Suhrawardī al-Maqtūl. (2026). Paradigma: Jurnal Kalam Dan Filsafat, 7(2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.15408/paradigma.v7i2.46909