The Islamic State and Thomas Hobbes: Views on the State, Law, and the Role of Religion

Robi Sugara, Rahmi Fitriyanti, Faisal Nurdin Idris

Abstract


Abstract. This article explains the concept of an Islamic state from the perspective of Thomas Hobbes' book Leviathan. Although Hobbes does not explicitly discuss the Islamic state, the basic principles of his theory of the absolute state, natural law, and the role of religion in a state provide a framework that can be used to explain the basic principles of the Islamic state. This article uses a qualitative approach with textual analysis methods on Hobbes' major work, Leviathan, as well as relevant literature on the concept of an Islamic state. Based on critical and interpretive readings of the text, this paper identifies and analyses the main themes related to absolute power and the role of religion in governance according to Hobbes. This analysis highlights how a state applying Islamic law (Sharia) can be compared to the concept of the state from a Hobbesian perspective, particularly in terms of absolute power and religious regulation to maintain order and peace. This article also discusses the relevance of Hobbes' natural law in the context of Islamic law and how the principles of universal justice and morality are applied. The findings of this article show that although there are fundamental differences in the sources of legitimacy and the role of religion, the basic principles of Hobbes' theory remain relevant in understanding the dynamics that occur in Islamic states, particularly in the modern world.

Keywords: Islamic State, Thommas Hobbes, Islamic Sharia, Power and Authority.

Abstrak. Artikel ini menjelaskan konsep negara Islam dalam perspektif Thomas Hobbes melalui buku Leviathan. Meskipun Hobbes tidak secara eksplisit membahas negara Islam dalam bukunya, namun prinsip dasar teorinya tentang negara absolut, hukum alam, dan peran agama dalam suatu negara memberikan kerangka yang dapat digunakan untuk menjelaskan pengertian negara Islam. Artikel ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis tekstual terhadap karya utama Hobbes, Leviathan, serta literatur yang relevan mengenai konsep negara Islam. Berdasarkan pembacaan teks secara kritis dan interpretatif, tulisan ini mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis tema-tema utama terkait kekuasaan absolut dan peran agama dalam pemerintahan menurut Hobbes. Analisis ini menyoroti bagaimana negara yang menerapkan hukum Islam (syariah) dapat dibandingkan dengan konsep negara dalam perspektif Hobbesian, khususnya dalam hal kekuasaan absolut dan peraturan agama untuk menjaga ketertiban dan perdamaian. Artikel ini juga membahas relevansi hukum alam ala Hobbes dalam konteks hukum Islam dan bagaimana prinsip keadilan dan moralitas universal diterapkan. Hasil artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat perbedaan mendasar dalam sumber legitimasi dan peran agama, namun prinsip dasar teori Hobbes tetap relevan dalam memahami dinamika yang terjadi di negara-negara Islam, khususnya di dunia modern.

Kata Kunci: Negara Islam, Thommas Hobbes, Hukum Syariah, Kekuasaan dan Otoritas.


Keywords


Islamic State; Thommas Hobbes; Islamic Sharia; Power and Authority; Negara Islam; Thommas Hobbes; Hukum Syariah; Kekuasaan dan Otoritas;

References


Abshar, F. U., Khanif, A., Efendi, A., & Muktafi, M. (2021). Islam and Human Rights: Friend or Foe? ADDIN, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v15i2.14868

Bowen, J. R. (2010). Why the French don’t like headscarves: Islam, the State, and public space. In Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630802597839

Byrd, D. (2017). Islam in a Post-Secular Society. In Islam in a Post-Secular Society. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004328556

Cole, W. M. (2023). The Islamic Human Rights Deficit: Region, Not Religion, Is the Driver. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2023.2212997

Cucu Nurhayati, H. H. (2015). Penerimaan Partai Politik Islam di PTAIN: Studi atas Perilaku Politik Mahasiswa di UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. https://jurnaldialog.kemenag.go.id/index.php/dialog/article/view/36

Davids, N. (2017). Islam, moderation, radicalism, and justly balanced communities. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2017.1384672

Esposito, J. L. (1996). Islam and Politics.

Ghafur, M. F., Basyar, M. H., Mashad, D., & Wahyudhi, N. (2018). Problematika Kekuatan Politik Islam di Arab Saudi, Kuwait, dan Uni Emirat Arab. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 15(1).

Gray, G. W., Hill, C., & Judson, M. A. (1971). God’s Englishman: Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution. The William and Mary Quarterly, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/1922205

Hara, A. E., Indriastuti, S., & Trihartono, A. (2022). Beyond the Global Agenda: State and Religious Non-state Actors’ Responses to Human Security in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v6i2.34112

Harris, R. A. (2016). Can states exist without gods? International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/cgp/v06i03/29-40

Hashemi, N., & Qureshi, E. (2022). Islam and Human Rights: A 50 Year Retrospective. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/mwjhr-2022-0007

Hizbullah, M., & Haidir, H. (2021). Din, Syariah, Fikih, Qoul, Fatwa, Qanin/Qonun Dan Qadha Dalam Hukum Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 3(1).

Houten, A. Vanden. (2002). Prudence in hobbes’s political philosophy. History of Political Thought, 23(2).

Huda, D. R. N., Rifa’i, A. N. R., Nindiasari, D. N., Pratama, D. F. N. P., & Khoiriyah, A. H. K. (2023). Pendidikan Islam Tradisional Dan Modern. Al-Riwayah : Jurnal Kependidikan, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.47945/al-riwayah.v15i2.949

Jaya, S. A. F. (2020). AL-QUR’AN DAN HADIS SEBAGAI SUMBER HUKUM ISLAM. JURNAL INDO-ISLAMIKA, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/idi.v9i2.17542

Jespersen, M. (2020). Challenging Hobbes: Is War Inevitable? Global Society, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2019.1668363

Karimi S. (2024). Human and Society in the Nature State and Civilized State from Hobbes Point of View. Philosophy International Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/phij-16000316

Kavrakis, K. (2023). Identity and Ideology through the Frames of Al Qaeda and Islamic State. Terrorism and Political Violence, 35(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2022.2035366

Kleidosty, J., & Jackson, I. (2017). Leviathan. In Leviathan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912282166

Kolo, A. M., & Abbas Bashar, T. (2024). ISLAM, WESTERNIZATION AND THE ROOTS OF MODERNISM IN MUSLIM LAND. Al-Risalah, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.34005/alrisalah.v15i1.3433

Kurniawan, K. N. (2020). Revisiting Secularism in Western Christendom: A Theological and Sociological Approach. Societas Dei: Jurnal Agama Dan Masyarakat, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.33550/sd.v7i1.125

Lavie, L. (2022). De-Theocratizing the State? The Debate over the Civil State (Dawla Madaniyya) Model in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Arabian Studies, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2022.2222443

Lindholm, S. (2023). Was Thomas Hobbes the first biopolitical thinker? History of the Human Sciences, 36(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951231159260

Lloyd, S. A. (2019). Interpreting hobbes’s political philosophy. In Interpreting Hobbes’s Political Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108234870

Locke, J. (2022). Two Treatises of Government. In Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300129182-003

Maliki, M., & Prihatiningsih, W. (2023). The Politics of Modernity: the Discourse of the Westphalian System toward the Native in Indonesia. Indonesian Perspective, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/ip.v8i1.56379

March, A. F. (2009). Islam and Liberal Citizenship: The Search for an Overlapping Consensus. In Islam and Liberal Citizenship: The Search for an Overlapping Consensus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195330960.001.0001

Matthiesen, T. (2023). THE CALIPH AND THE IMAM: THE MAKING OF SUNNISM AND SHIISM. In The Caliph and the Imam: The Making of Sunnism and Shiism. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190689469.001.0001

Mudzakkir, A. (2016). ISLAM DAN POLITIK DI ERA KONTEMPORER. Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2016.11.1.31-48

Muhammad, S., & Ramzan, H. M. (2019). The Islamic Welfare State Concept and Practices. Al Qalam, 24(2).

Muktafi, Al Haidary, A. H., & Zamzami, M. (2022). REREADING SAYYID QUṬB’S ISLAMISM AND POLITICAL CONCEPT OF AL-ḤĀKIMIYYAH: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS. Afkar, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol24no1.8

Munajah, N. (2021). AGAMA DAN TANTANGAN MODERNITAS. Tahdzib Al-Akhlaq: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.34005/tahdzib.v4i1.1433

Murtianto, T. B. (2022). Thomas Hobbes: Ketakutan sebagai Dasar Terbentuknya Negara. Jurnal Hukum NOVUM ARGUMENTUM, 1(1).

Neoh, J. (2023). Kierkegaard and Hobbes on the State of Nature. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 68(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auae002

Nursanik, N., & Mursidah, I. (2021). KRITIK NALAR PEMIKIRAN POLITIK THOMAS HOBBES. Al Qisthas Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.37035/alqisthas.v11i2.3794

Nurtina, S. (2019). CRITIC TOWARD THE NEW POLITIC OF ISLAM; PAN-ISLAMISME. Journal of Islamic World and Politics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jiwp.3130

Nurwahidin dkk. (2021). Hubungan Islam dan Negara Dalam Perspektif Pemikiran Sekuler Ali Abdurraziq. Jurnal of Middle East and Islamic Studies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/meis.v8i2.140

Oktaviani, J., & Pramadya, T. P. (2019). Model Negara Kekuasaan: Orde Baru dalam Tinjauan Pemikiran Hobbes dan Niccolo Machiavelli. Indonesian Perspective , 4(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/ip.v4i2.26701.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/jisi.v5i1.39937



Copyright (c) 2024 Robi Sugara, Rahmi Fitriyanti, Faisal Nurdin Idris

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.