1. Home
  2. Volume 6 Number 1, Nov 2021
  3. Vianica

Representation of the Self and Other in Joe Biden's Democratic National Convention Speech

Ingrit Vianica, Trisnowati Tanto

Abstract


This paper discusses the analysis of positive self-presentation and negative other-presentation in Joe Biden’s speech in Democratic National Convention on 20 August 2020. This research utilizes van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), in which the main analysis is related to social power abuse and inequality in the social and political context. The main purpose of this research is to find out how language contributes to build both positive and negative representation in the speech. However, the research will only focus on the micro-level approach which consists of macrostructure, microstructure, and superstructure analyses. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method since it involves data interpretation in describing the representation. The result of the analysis shows that Biden as the Self has a positive representation; on the other hand, Trump as the Other has a negative representation. Both negative and positive representation are formed through various tools. Through this analysis, it is hoped that people can be more critical in absorbing the information given by political figures.

Keywords


Critical Discourse Analysis; Van Dijk; Micro-level analysis; Positive and negative representation; Political speech

References


Edelman, A. (2020, August 24). Biden claps back at Trump’s criticism over his mental fitness: “Watch me”. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-claps-back-trump-s-criticism-over-his-mental-fitness-n1237811

Flayih, R. M., & Taifoor, A. I. (2018). Ideological implications in Julia Gillard’s speech on immigration: Critical discourse analysis. Journal of University of Babylon, Humanities, 26(5), 145-156. https://www.journalofbabylon.com/index.php/JUBH/article/view/954

Hall, S. (2013). Presentation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (2nd Ed.). Sage Publication Ltd. https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/55352_Hall_ch_1.pdf

Harris, R. A. (2013). A handbook of rhetorical discourse. https://hellesdon.org

Hornby, A. S. (2015). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English. Oxford University Press.

Keraf, G. (2007). Diksi dan gaya bahasa. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kurniawati, D., & Kurniawan, T. O. (2017). Using highlighted journal strategy in teaching analytical exposition text. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 10(2), 194-210. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/ENGEDU/article/view/1745/1453

Rohmah, S. N. (2018). Critical discourse analysis of Donald J Trump’s speeches [Bachelor’s thesis, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University]. Digital Library UIN Surabaya. http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/26939/2/Siti%20Nur%20Rohmah_A73214060.pdf

Stevens, M. (2020, August 20). Joe Biden accepts presidential nomination: Full transcript. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/20/us/politics/biden-presidential-nomination-dnc.html

The Free Dictionary. (n.d.). Modal auxiliary verbs – will. https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Modal-Auxiliary-Verbs-Will.htm

van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructure: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

van Dijk, T. A. (1986). News schemata. In S. Greenbaum & Cooper (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches (pp. 155-186). Sage. http://www.discourses.org

van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283. http://www.discourses.org

van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Pompeu Fobra University. http://www.discourses.org

van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Discourse: language, context, and interaction. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Ideology and discourse. In M. Freeden, L. T. Sargen, & M. Stears (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political ideologies (pp. 175-196). Oxford University Press. http://www.discourses.org

van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 466-485). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://www.discourses.org


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/insaniyat.v6i1.20575

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.