Determinant of The Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a very important role for the company and now become an obligation for every company. The purpose of this study examined the effect of institutional ownership, board of commissioners, profitability and size on CSR disclosure. This research conducted at mining manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2013-2014 and obtained 76 sample companies. The method used is multiple regression analysis. The result showed only institutional ownership affecting CSR disclosure. This suggests institutional ownership structure can act in monitoring the company. Independent board has not effected on CSR, it failed to monitor the actions of top management. Profitability has not effected on the disclosure of CSR, it enabled the company to have two perspectives on CSR. The most companies view CSR as a deduction from earnings. CSR disclosure has not affect the size of the CSR disclosure area.
Keywords
References
Adam, C., Hill., & Roberts, C. (1998). Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe. British Accounting Review. 30 (1): 1-21.
Anggraini, F. R. R. (2006). Pengungkapan Informasi Sosial dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan Informasi Sosial dalam Laporan Keuangan Tahunan: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan-Perusahaan yang terdaftar Bursa Efek Jakarta (Social Information Disclosure and The Factors that Affect Social Information Disclosure in Annual Reporting: Empirical Study in Companies Listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9 Padang.
Belkaoui, A. and P. Karpik. Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal. 2 (1): 36-51.
Darwin, A. (2006). Akuntabilitas, Kebutuhan, Pelaporan dan Pengungkapan CSR Bagi Perusahaan di Indonesia (Accountability, Needs, Reporting and Disclosure of CSR fro Companies in Indonesia). Economic Business & Accounting Review. III: 83–95.
Fauzi, H., Mahoney, L.S., Rahman, A.A. (2007). The Link Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Companies. Issue in Social and Environmental Accounting. 1 (1): 149-159.
Gray, R., Javad, M. & David, M. (2001). Social and Environmental Disclosure and Corporate Characteristic: A Resesrch Note and Extension. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal. 28 (3): 327-356.
Hackston, D. & Milne, M. (1996). Some Determinant of Social and Environmental Disclosure in New Zaeland Companies. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal. 9 (1): 77-108.
Hasibuan, R. (2001). Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan terhadap Pengungkapan Sosial (The Effect of Company Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure). (Unpublished Thesis). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Karima, N. (2014). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, dan Kepemilikan Asing terhadap Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan (The Effect of Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, and Foreign Ownership in Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure). Widya Warta. 2: 219–230.
Khasharmeh, H. a, & Desoky, A. M. (2013). On-line Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures : The Case of the Gulf Cooperation Council ( GCC ) Countries. Global Review of Accounting and Finance. 4 (2): 39–64.
Machmud, N. & Djakman. D.C. (2008). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan terhadap Luas Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial pada Laporan Tahunan Perusahaan; Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Publik yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2006 (The Effect of Ownership Structure to Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Annual Reporting: Empirical Study on Public Companies Listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI. Pontianak.
Mursalim. (2007). Simultanitas Aktivisme Institusional, Struktur Kepemilikan, Kebijakan Dividen dan Utang dalam Mengurangi Konflik Keagenan (Simoultaneously of Institutional Activities, Ownership Structure, Dividend Policy and Debt in Reduce the Agency Conflict). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. Makasar.
Patten, D.M. (1991). Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy . 10: 297-308.
Patten, D.M. (1992). Intra-Industry Environmental Disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 17 (5): 471-485.
Puspita, S.R. & Harto, P. (2014). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (The Effect of Good Corporate Governance to Tax Evasion). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. 3 (2): 1-13
Said., Roshima., Yuserrie. Z.& Hasnah, H. (2009). The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance Characteristic in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Social Responsibility Journal. 5(2): 212-226.
Sembiring, E. R. (2005). Karakteristik Perusahaan dan Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial: Study Empiris pada Perusahaan Yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Jakarta (Company's Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosre: Empirical Study in Companies Listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 8. pp. 379–395.
Setyorini, C. T., & Ishak, Z. (2012). Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure : A Positive Accounting Theory View Point. Internatioanl Journal of Business and Social Science. 3 (9): 152–164.
Sunarsih, U. (2009). Hubungan antara Pengungkapan Aspek Sosial Ekonomi terhadap Size, Likuiditas, Solvabilitas dan Struktur Kepemilikan: Studi Kasus JII dan Non JII (The Relationship Between Socio-Economic Disclosure to Size, Liquidity, Solvability, and Ownership Structure: Case Study at JII and Non-JII). Jurnal Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi. 9 (1): 74–90.
Yuliana, R., Purnomosidhi, B., & Sukoharsono, E. G. (2008). Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dan Dampaknya terhadap Reaksi Investor (The Effect of Company Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosre and The Impact on Investor's Reaction). Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia. 5 (2): 246–276.
DOI: 10.15408/etk.v16i2.5236
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
