How Does Nuclear Energy Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from the United States

Melike Atay Polat; Buket Savranlar; Ferhan Arslan

How Does Nuclear Energy Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from the United States

Melike Atay Polat, Buket Savranlar, Ferhan Arslan

Abstract

Research Originality: Nuclear power plant installation activities, which have gained momentum since the 1970s, have made the use of nuclear energy widespread, and especially the US ranks first in the world in the nuclear energy use. This article contributes to the existing literature on environmental economics by incorporating environmental technologies and globalization into the investigation of the impact of nuclear energy on environmental pollution. Research Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of nuclear energy consumption, environmental technologies and globalization on environmental pollution in the US.Research Methods: The paper use ARDL approach with the data of 1970-2018 period. Empirical Results: According to the findings, nuclear energy consumption negatively affects environmental quality in the US both in the short and long run. On the contrary, while environment-related technologies contribute positively to environmental quality with a reducing effect on carbon footprint in the long run. Also, globalization has an insignificant effect on environment in both short and long run.Implications: It is thought that environmental quality will improve as a result of supporting environmental technologies and exchanging nuclear energy with renewable energy sources in the US.

JEL Classification: Q43, C32

How to Cite:
Atay Polat, M., Savranlar, B., Arslan, F. (2024). How Does Nuclear Energy Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from US. Etikonomi, 23(2), 511 – 526. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v23i2.37692.

Keywords

nuclear energy; ecological footprint; environmental technologies; ARDL approach

References

Adebayo, T. S. & Özkan, O. (2024). Investigating the Influence of Socioeconomic Conditions, Renewable Energy and Eco-Innovation on Environmental Degradation in the United States: A Wavelet Quantile-Based Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140321.

Ahmed, S., Ahmed, K. & Ismail, M. (2020). Predictive Analysis of CO2 Emissions and the Role of Environmental Technology, Energy Use and Economic Output: Evidence from Emerging Economies. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, 13, 1035-1044.

Alataş, S. (2022). Do Environmental Technologies Help to Reduce Transport Sector CO2 Emissions? Evidence from the EU15 Countries. Research in Transportation Economics, 91, 101047.

Ali, S., Jiang, J., Hassan, S. T. & Shah, A. A. (2022). Revolution of Nuclear Energy Efficiency, Economic Complexity, Air Transportation, and Industrial Improvement on Environmental Footprint Cost: A Novel Dynamic Simulation Approach. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54(10), 3682-3694.

Aluko, O. A., Opoku, E. E. O. & Ibrahim, M. (2021). Investigating the Environmental Effect of Globalization: Insights from Selected Industrialized Countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 281, 111892.

Azam, A., Tafiq, M., Shafique, M. & Yuan, J. (2021). Does Nuclear or Renewable Energy Consumption Help to Control Environmental Pollution? New Evidence from China. Renewable Energy Focus, 39, 139-147.

Baek, J. (2015). A Panel Cointegration Analysis of CO2 Emissions, Nuclear Energy, and Income in Major Nuclear Generating Countries. Applied Energy, 145, 133-138.

Bandyopadhyay, A. & Rej, S. (2021). Can Nuclear Energy Fuel and Environmentally Sustainable Economic Growth? Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis for India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 63065-63086.

Bandyopadhyay, A., Rej, S., Villanthenkodath, M. A. & Mahalik, M. K. (2022). The Role of Nuclear Energy Consumption in Abatement of Ecological Footprint: Novel Insights from Quantile-on-Quantile Regression. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132052.

Bai, C., Feng, C. Yan, H., Yi, X., Chen, Z. & Wei, W. (2020). Will Income Inequality Influence the Abatement Effect of Renewable Energy Technological Innovation on Carbon Dioxide Emissions?. Journal of Environmental Management, 264, 110482.

Bian, Q., Han, Z., Veuthey, J. & Ma, B. (2021). Risk Perceptions of Nuclear Energy, Climate Change, and Earthquake: How Are They Correlated and Differentiated by Ideologies?. Climate Risk Management, 32, 100297.

Chien, F., Amanzeh, M., Mirza, F., Bakar, A., Vu, H. M. & Ngo, T. Q. (2021). The Effects of Green Growth, Environmental-Related Tax, and Eco-Innovation Towards Carbon Neutrality Target in the US Economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113633.

Çakar, N. D., Erdoğan, S., Gedikli, A. & Öncü, M. A. (2022). Nuclear Energy Consumption, Nuclear Fusion Reactors and Environmental Quality: The case of G7 Countries. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54, 1301-1311.

Danish, Ozcan, B. & Ulucak, R. (2021). An Empirical Investigation of Nuclear Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emission in India: Bridging IPAT and EKC Hypotheses. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 53, 2056-2065.

Dietz, T. & Rosa, E.A. (1997). Effects of Population and Affluence on CO2 Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 94,175–179.

Farooq, S., Ozturk, I., Majeed, M. T. & Akram, R. (2022). Globalization and CO2 Emissions in the Presence of EKC: A Global Panel Data Analysis. Gondwana Research, 106, 367-378.

Fatima, N., Yanting, Z. & Guohua, N. (2023). Role of Environmentally Related Technologies and Revenue Taxes in Environmental Degradation in OECD Countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 73283–73298.

Gallagher, K. P. (2009). Economic Globalization and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 279-304.

Gangopadhyay, P., Das, N., Alam, G.M. M., Khan, U., Haseeb, M. & Hossain, M. E. (2023). Revisiting the Carbon Pollution-Inhibiting Policies in the USA Using the Quantile ARDL Methodology: What Roles can Clean Energy and Globalization Play?. Renewable Energy, 204, 710-721.

Haq, Z.U., Mehmood, U., Tariq, S. & Mariam, A. (2024). The Impacts of Globalization and GDP on CO2 Emissions: Do Technological Innovation and Renewable Energy Lower Some Burden in SAARC Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01704-z.

Hassan, S. T., Danish, Khan, S-U-D., Baloch, M. A. & Tarar, Z. H. (2020). Is Nuclear Energy a Better Alternative for Mitigating CO2 Emissions in BRICS Countries? An Empirical Analysis. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52, 2969-2974.

Hassan, S. T., Wang, P., Khan, I. & Zhu, B. (2023). The Impact of Economic Complexity, Technology Advancements, and Nuclear Energy Consumption on the Ecological Footprint of the USA: Towards Circular Economy Initiatives. Gondwana Research, 113, 237-246.

Hassan, S. T., Baloch, M. A., Bui, Q. & Khan, N. H. (2024). The Heterogeneous Impact of Geopolitical Risk and Environment-Related Innovations on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Role of Nuclear and Renewable Energy in the Circular Economy. Gondwana Research, 127, 144-155.

Heidary, A.R.S., Aminzadeh, M., Sabonis, M.S., Shadloosofla, E. K. & Riahi, A. (2021). Investigating the Impact of Globalization on CO2 Emissions in the MENA Region: Application of Spatial Regression. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 52(1), 53-68.

Hussain, M., Mir, G. M., Usman, M., Ye, C. & Mansoor, S. (2022). Analyzing the Role of Environment-Related Technologies and Carbon Emissions in Emerging Economies: A Step Towards Sustainable Development. Environmental Technology, 43(3), 367-375.

Jahanger, A., Zaman, U., Hossain, M. R. & Awan, A. (2023). Articulating CO2 Emissions Limiting Roles of Nuclear Energy and ICT Under the EKC Hypothesis: An Application of Non-Parametric MMQR Approach. Geoscience Frontiers, 14(5), 101589.

Jin, T. & Kim, J. (2018). What is Better for Mitigating Carbon Emissions-Renewable Energy or Nuclear Energy? A Panel Data Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 91, 464-471.

Kalaycı, C. & Hayaloğlu, P. (2019). The Impact of Economic Globalization on CO2 Emissions: The Case of NAFTA Countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(1), 356-360.

Kartal, M. T., Samour, A., Adebayo, T. S. & Depren, S. K. (2023). Do Nuclear Energy and Renewable Energy Surge Environmental Quality in th United States? New Insights from Novel Bootstrap Fourier Granger Causality in Quantiles Approach. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 155, 104509.

Kirkman, H. (2015). Globalization and the Environment. Australasian Journal of Environment Management, 23(1), 371-395.

Majeed, M. T., Ozturk, I., Samreen, I. & Luna, T. (2022). Evaluating the Asymmetric Effects of Nuclear Energy on Carbon Emissions in Pakistan. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54, 1664-1673.

Mehboob, M. Y., Ma, B., Sadiq, M. & Zhang, Y. (2024). Does Nuclear Energy Reduce Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions: The Role of Environmental Taxes and Trade Globalization in Highest Carbon Emitting Countries. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 56(1), 180-188.

Ozgur, O., Yilanci, V. & Kongkuah, M. (2022). Nuclear Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in India: Evidence from Fourier ARDL Bounds Test Approach. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54, 1657-1663.

Pan, B. & Zhang, Y. (2020). Impact of Affluence, Nuclear and Alternative Energy on US Carbon Emissions from 1960 to 2014. Energy Strategy Reviews, 32, 100581.

Panayotou, T. (2000). Globalization and Environment. CID Working Paper Series (No. 2000.53), Harvard University, Cambridge, 1-48.

Pata, U. K. (2021). Linking Renewable Energy, Globalization Agriculture, CO2 Emissions and Ecological Footprint in BRIC Countries: A Sustainability Perspective. Renewable Energy, 173, 197-208.

Pata, U. K. & Samour, A. (2022). Do Renewable and Nuclear Energy Enhance Environmental Quality in France? A New EKC Approach with the Load Capacity Factor. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 149, 104249.

Pesaran M. H. & Y. Shin (1995). An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 371-413.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Long Run Relationship. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.

Sadiq, M., Shinwari, R., Usman, M., Ozturk, I. & Maghyereh, A. I. (2022a). Linking Nuclear Energy, Human Development and Carbon Emission in BRICS Region: Do External Debt and Financial Globalization Protect the Environment?. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54(9), 3299-3309.

Sadiq, M., Wen, F. & Dagestani, A. A. (2022b). Environmental Footprint Impacts of Nuclear Energy Consumption: The Role of Environmental Technology and Globalization in Ten Largest Ecological Footprint Countries. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54(10), 3672-3681.

Saidi, K. & Omri, A. (2020). Reducing CO2 Emissions in OECD Countries: Do Renewable and Nuclear Energy Matter?. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 126, 103425.

Sun, Y., Yesilada, F., Andlib, Z. & Ajaz, T. (2021). The Role of Eco-Innovation and Globalization Towards Carbon Neutrality in the USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113568.

Usman, O., Akadiri, S. S. & Adeshola, I. (2020). Role of Renewable Energy and Globalization on Ecological Footprint in the USA: Implications for Environmental Sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 30681-30693.

Usman, M & Hammar, N. (2021). Dynamic Relationship between Technological Innovations, Financial Development, Renewable Energy, and Ecological Footprint: Fresh Insights Based on the STIRPAT Model for Asia Pasific Economic Cooperation Countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 15519-15536.

Usman, M., Jahanger, A., Radulescu, M. & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). Do Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, and Environmental-Related Technologies Asymmetrically Reduce Ecological Footprint? Evidence from Pakistan. Energies, 15, 3448.

You, C., Khattak, S. I. & Ahmad, M. (2022). Impact of Innovation in Renewable Energy Generation, Transmission, or Distribution-Related Technologies on Carbon Dioxide Emission in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 29756-29777.

Yurtkuran, S. (2021). The Effect of Agriculture, Renewable Energy Production, and Globalization on CO2 Emissions in Turkey: A bootstrap ARDL Approach. Renewable Energy, 171, 1236-1245.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/etk.v23i2.37692