Effects of Leverage, Liquidity, and Profitability on The Rating of Sukuk
Abstract
The rating of Sukuk becomes the reflection of the capital markets' activities. The better rating of Sukuk, the more investor is interested in purchasing a Sukuk. This study aimed to examine the effects of leverage, liquidity, and profitability on Sukuk's rating. The technique of data analysis employed was ordinal logistic regression. The research result revealed that the leverage and liquidity affected the Sukuk. Meanwhile, the profitability did not affect the rating of Sukuk. The test result simultaneously showed that the leverage variable and liquidity affected the Sukuk rating. Overall, this study's research result supported the previous research that discovered the impacts of leverage and liquidity variables on Sukuk's rating. The implication is that companies should improve their leverage and liquidity performance to improve the bond rating.
JEL Classifications: G1
How to Cite:
Nurohman, D., Lutfiana, I. M., & Khoiriawati, N. (2020). Effects of Leverage, Liquidity, and Profitability on The Rating of Sukuk. Etikonomi: Jurnal Ekonomi, 19(2), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v19i2.16274.
Keywords
References
Ahmad, N., Daud, S. N. M., & Kefeli, Z. (2012). Economic Forces and the Sukuk Market. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2012.11.101.
Ahmed, E. R., Islam, M. A., Alabdullah, T. T. Y., & Ariffin, K. H. K. (2014). Islamic Sukuk: Pricing Mechanism and Rating. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 4(11), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.36478/sscience.2015.178.183.
Alam, N., Hassan, M. K., & Haque, M. A. (2013). Are Islamic Bonds Different from Conventional Bonds? International Evidence from Capital Market Tests. Borsa Istanbul Review, 13(3), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2013.10.006.
Arief, T. (2018). Kinerja Pasar Modal Indonesia Masih Sangat Baik (Indonesia's Capital Market Performance Is Still Very Good). Retrieved from: https://market.bisnis.com/read/20180907/7/836229/kinerja-pasar-modal-indonesia-masih-sangat-baik. diakses Oktober 2018.
Arisanti, I., Fadah, I., & Puspitasari, N. (2014). Prediksi Peringkat Obligasi Syariah Di Indonesia (Prediction of Sharia Bond Rating in Indonesia). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 11(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21831/jim.v11i3.11780
Azmat, S., Skully, M., & Brown, K. (2014). Credit Risk in Islamic Joint Venture Bond. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, S129–S145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.020.
Barakat, A. (2014). The Impact of Financial Structure, Financial Leverage and Profitability on Industrial Companies Shares Value (Applied Study on a Sample of Saudi Industrial Companies). Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(1), 22222847.
Baswir, R. (2010). Indonesia Krisis Kesejahteraan (Indonesia Welfare Crisis). Retrieved from: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2010/02/09/16155966/
Bhuiyan, R. A., Rahman, M. P., Saiti, B., & Mat Ghani, G. (2018). Financial Integration between Sukuk and Bond Indices of Emerging Markets: Insights From Wavelet Coherence and Multivariate-GARCH Analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(3), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.11.006
Cook, T. D., & DeMets, D. L. (2007). Introduction to Statistical Methods for Clinical Trials. Florida: CRC Press.
Elhaj, M. A. A., Muhamed, N. A., & Ramli, N. M. (2015). The Influence of Corporate Governance, Financial Ratios, and Sukuk Structure on Sukuk Rating. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01132-6.
Ghozali, I. (2013). Model Persamaan Struktural, Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program Amos 21.0 (Structural Equation Models, Concepts and Applications with Amos 21.0 Program) (5th ed.). Semarang: BP UNDIP.
Godlewski, C. J., Turk-Ariss, R., & Weill, L. (2013). Sukuk vs. Conventional Bonds: A Stock Market Perspective. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(3), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.02.006.
Haji Wahab, M. Z. bin, & Naim, A. M. (2020). Sustainable and Responsible Investment: Concept and the Commonalities with Islamic Financial Institutions. Etikonomi, 19(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v19i1.13772
Halim, Z. A., How, J., Verhoeven, P., & Hassan, M. K. (2019). The Value of Certification in Islamic Bond Offerings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 55, 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.09.002.
Hamdan, A., Sarea, A., Khamis, R., & Anasweh, M. (2020). A Causality Analysis of the Link between Higher Education and Economic Development: Empirical Evidence. Heliyon, 6(6), e04046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04046.
Hanafi, M. M. (2004). Manajemen Keuangan (Financial Management). Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.
Honková, I. (2015). International Financial Reporting Standards Applied in the Czech Republic. Economics and Management XVIII(3), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul.001/2015-3-008.
Jiang, J. X., Stanford, M. H., & Xie, Y. (2012). Does it Matter Who Pays for Bond Ratings? Historical Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.001.
Kaya, H. D. (2014). The Impact of Leverage on Trade Firms’ Profitability and Liquidity Measures. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(3), 66-70.
Lai, J., Rethel, L., & Steiner, K. (2017). Conceptualizing Dynamic Challenges to Global Financial Diffusion: Islamic Finance and the Grafting of Sukuk. Review of International Political Economy, 24(6), 958–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2017.1373689
Melzatia, S., Badaruddin, R. F. R., & Hammat, Z. (2019). Sukuk Rating, the Involvement of Agency Theory. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(8), 139–155.
Nagano, M. (2016). Who Issues Sukuk and When? An Analysis of the Determinants of Islamic Bond Issuance. Review of Financial Economics, 31, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2016.05.002
Najeeb, S. F., Bacha, O., & Masih, M. (2017). Does a Held-to-Maturity Strategy Impede Effective Portfolio Diversification for Islamic Bond (Sukuk) Portfolios? A Multi-Scale Continuous Wavelet Correlation Analysis. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(10), 2377–2393. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1205977
Pebruary, S. (2016). Pengaruh Rasio Profitabilitas, Rasio Likuiditas, Rasio Leverage, dan Pendapatan Bunga Terhadap Rating Sukuk Korporasi Periode 2010-2013 (The Effect of Profitability Ratios, Liquidity Ratios, Leverage Ratios, and Interest Income on Corporate Sukuk Ratings for the 2010-2013 Period). Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi & Bisnis, 13(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.34001/jdeb.v13i1.397.
Pranoto, G. E., Anggraini, R., & Takidah, E. (2015). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, Produktivitas, dan Reputasi Auditor Terhadap Rating Sukuk (The Effect of Profitability, Company Size, Productivity, and Auditor's Reputation on Sukuk Ratings). Wahana Akuntansi, 12(1), 13-27.
Pribadi, S. K., & Wibowo, B. (2019). The Analysis of Company Decisions in Choosing Sukuk and Bonds Using Logit Model. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 10(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2019.10.1.3211
Raffestin, L. (2017). Do Bond Credit Ratings Lead to Excess Comovement? Journal of Banking and Finance, 85, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.08.010
Reboredo, J. C., & Naifar, N. (2017). Do Islamic Bond (Sukuk) Prices Reflect Financial and Policy Uncertainty? A Quantile Regression Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(7), 1535–1546. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1256197
Rely, G., & Arsjah, R. J. (2018). An Effecting of Foreign Ownership Structure in Firm Value Towards Offshore Debt Financing in Manufacturing Firms. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(12), 46–56.
Renaldi, J. Y., Pinem, D. B., & Permadhy, Y. T. (2020). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Value of Manufacturing Industry Companies in the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.1.230
Saad, N. M., Haniff, M. N., & Ali, N. (2016). Firm’s Growth and Sustainability: The Role of Institutional Investors in Mitigating the Default Risks of Sukuk and Conventional Bonds. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00042-3
Sejati, G. P. (2011). Analisis Faktor Akuntansi dan Non Akuntansi dalam Memprediksi Peringkat Obligasi Perusahaan Manufaktur (Analysis of Accounting and Non-Accounting Factors in Predicting Bond Rating of Manufacturing Companies). Bisnis & Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 17(1), 70-78.
Smaoui, H., Mimouni, K., & Temimi, A. (2020). The Impact of Sukuk on the Insolvency Risk of Conventional and Islamic Banks. Applied Economics, 52(8), 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1646406
Widani, N. A., & Bernawati, Y. (2020). Effectiveness of Corporate Governance and Audit Quality: The Role of Ownership Concentration as Moderation. Etikonomi, 19(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v19i1.14893.
Wilson, R. (2008). Innovation in the Structuring of Islamic Sukuk Securities. Humanomics, 24(3), 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288660810899340
Zakaria, N. B., Md Isa, M. A., & Abidin, R. A. Z. (2012a). The Construct of Sukuk, Rating and Default Risk. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 662–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.181
Zakaria, N. B., Md Isa, M. A., & Abidin, R. A. Z. (2012b). The Construct of Sukuk, Rating and Default Risk. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 662–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.181
DOI: 10.15408/etk.v19i2.16274
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 ETIKONOMI
