PENERAPAN PRINSIP HAM PADA SISTEM LAYANAN DAN RUJUKAN TERPADU (SLRT) DI KABUPATEN BANDUNG
Abstract
Abstract. The implementation of SLRT must seek the application of legal, responsive, transparent, participatory, gender equality, accountable, objective, and sustainable principles. Bandung Regency is an area that has held SLRT since 2016 until now and has received Best Practice achievements from the Ministry of Social Affairs. In fact, the characteristics of the region can be a challenge for the implementation of the SLRT implementation principle. Namely, the male population is greater than the female population, the area is large and consists of lowlands and highlands, and the 69 OPDs have their own programs and target recipients. The researcher wants to know how the Bandung Regency SLRT applies the principles of its implementation by using a human rights-based approach theory. This is because there is harmony between the principles of implementing SLRT and human rights principles in the form of participation, accountability, non-discrimination and equity. Information regarding the implementation of SLRT Bandung Regency is presented using qualitative data, sourced from interviews, non-participant observation, and literature studies. The findings of the study state that the implementation of SLRT in Bandung Regency shows active community participation and differences in treatment in the delivery of services that support substantive gender equality. On the other hand, not all OPDs in Bandung Regency have succeeded in integrating their programs and program beneficiary targets with SLRT. Thus, service delivery is not fully sustainable. However, this is not a form of government reluctance, but rather due to limited resources.
Keywords: Implementation of SLRT; Human Rights-Based Approach; Human Rights Principle.
Abstrak. Penyelenggaraan SLRT harus mengupayakan penerapan asas legal, responsif, transparan, partisipatif, kesetaraan gender, akuntabel, objektif, dan berkelanjutan. Kabupaten Bandung merupakan daerah yang telah menyelenggarakan SLRT sejak tahun 2016 hingga saat ini dan mendapatkan prestasi Best Practice dari Kementerian Sosial. Padahal, karakteristik wilayahnya dapat menjadi tantangan diterapkannya asas penyelenggaraan SLRT. Yaitu, jumlah penduduk laki-laki yang lebih banyak dibandingkan perempuan, wilayah yang luas dan terdiri atas dataran rendah dan tinggi, serta 69 OPD yang memiliki program dan sasaran penerimanya masing-masing. Peneliti ingin mengetahui bagaimana SLRT Kabupaten Bandung menerapkan asas penyelenggaraannya dengan menggunakan teori pendekatan berbasis HAM. Pasalnya, terdapat keselarasan antara asas penyelenggaraan SLRT dengan prinsip HAM berupa partisipasi, akuntabilitas, non diskriminasi dan ekuitas. Informasi mengenai penyelenggaraan SLRT Kabupaten Bandung disajikan menggunakan data kualitatif, bersumber dari kegiatan wawancara, observasi non partisipan, dan studi literatur. Hasil temuan penelitian menyatakan penyelenggaraan SLRT Kabupaten Bandung menunjukkan upaya partisipasi aktif masyarakat dan perbedaan perlakuan dalam penyelenggaraan layanan yang mendukung kesetaraan substantif gender. Di sisi lain, belum semua OPD di Kabupaten Bandung berhasil mengintegrasikan program dan sasaran penerima programnya dengan SLRT. Sehingga, penyelenggaraan layanan belum sepenuhnya berkelanjutan. Namun, hal tersebut bukan merupakan bentuk keengganan pemerintah, melainkan karena keterbatasan sumber daya.
Kata kunci: Penyelenggaraan SLRT; Pendekatan Berbasis HAM; Prinsip HAM
Keywords
References
Androff, D. (2018). Human rights-based social investments. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 45(4), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.4248
Arsyad, Y., Rusyidi, B., & Fedryansyah, M. 2022. Pendekatan Berbasis Hak dalam Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) di Kota Gorontalo.
Bale Bandung. (9 Mei 2017). SLRT Kab Bandung Raih Apresiasi Best Practice Tingkat Nasional. Diambil dari https://www.balebandung.com/slrt-kab-bandung-raih-apresiasi-best-practise-tingkat-nasional/
Chilton, A., & Versteeg, M. (2017). Rights without resources: The impact of constitutional social rights on social spending. Journal of Law and Economics, 60(4), 713–748. https://doi.org/10.1086/696826
Creswell, W. J. (2018). Research Design. In Syria Studies (4th ed., Vol. 7, Issue 1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/41857625
Crinis, V. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Rights and Clothing Workers in Bangladesh and Malaysia. Asian Studies Review, 43(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1588850
Dowler, E. A., & O’Connor, D. (2012). Rights-based approaches to addressing food poverty and food insecurity in Ireland and UK. Social Science and Medicine, 74(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.036
Gabel, S. G. (2016). Understanding a Rights-Based Approach to Social Policy Analysis. March 2016, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24412-9_1
Hartono, M. D. (2015). Pendekatan Berbasis Ham Dalam Kebijakan Rehabilitasi Dan Rekonstruksi Pasca Erupsi Gunung Merapi. 1(69), 5–24.
Hossain, N., & Oosterom, M. (2021). The Implications of Closing Civic Space for Hunger and Poverty in the Global South. Global Policy, 12(S5), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12979
Huruswati, M. &. (2015). PELAYANAN SATU PINTU PENANGGULANGAN KEMISKINAN DI SRAGEN ONE STOP SERVICES OF HANDLING POVERTY IN THE SRAGEN Muhtar. 200, 277–291.
Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia, (2020). Pedoman Umum Pelaksanaan Sistem Layanan dan Rujukan Terpadu Dan Puskesos.
Lokot, M. (2021). Whose Voices? Whose Knowledge? A Feminist Analysis of the Value of Key Informant Interviews. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920948775
London, L., & Schneider, H. (2012). Globalization and health inequalities: Can a human rights paradigm create space for civil society action? Social Science and Medicine, 74(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.022
Mahojwala, G., Prasetya, J. D., Khabibah, S. U., Maharani, Y. N., & Cahyadi, T. A. (2022). Peran Pendekatan Berbasis Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Mendorong Pemenuhan Hak dalam Pengurangan Risiko Bencana. Jurnal Mineral, Energi, Dan Lingkungan, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31315/jmel.v6i1.4320
McPherson, J. (2020). Now Is the Time for a Rights-Based Approach to Social Work Practice. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 5(2), 61–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00125-1
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. United States of America: SAGE Publications.
Osuji, O. K., & Obibuaku, U. L. (2016). Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility: Competing or Complementary Approaches to Poverty Reduction and Socioeconomic Rights? Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2523-y
Plagerson, S., Patel, L., Hochfeld, T., & Ulriksen, M. S. (2019). Social policy in South Africa: Navigating the route to social development. World Development, 113, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.019
Singh, P. K., & Chudasama, H. (2020). Evaluating poverty alleviation strategies in a developing country. PLoS ONE, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227176
Sukoco, D. H. (2020). Efektivitas Sistem Layanan Dan Rujukan Terpadu “Sabilulungan” Kabupaten Bandung. Pekerjaan Sosial, 19(1), 1–15. http://jurnal.poltekesos.ac.id/index.php/peksos/article/view/258
United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, (2016). The human rights-based approach to social protection. Social Protection in Developing Countries: Reforming Systems, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082294
Wang, Z., Wang, W., Yu, L., & Zhang, D. (2022). Multidimensional Poverty Alleviation Effect of Different Rural Land Consolidation Models: A Case Study of Hubei And Guizhou, China. Journal Land Use Policy, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106399
DOI: 10.15408/empati.v12i2.34066
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Firda Dwi Anjani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
