ANALISIS PROCESS TERHADAP STRATEGI GRADUASI KELUARGA PENERIMA MANFAAT PROGRAM KELUARGA HARAPAN DI KABUPATEN CIANJUR DALAM KERANGKA RESULT-BASED MANAGEMENT

Dini Fajar Yanti, Isbandi Rukminto Adi

Abstract


Abstrack. Some studies explained that the Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) gave a positive contribution for improving the health, nutritional status and education level of Beneficiary Families (Keluarga Penerima Manfaat). However, this program still had limitation for family-economical improvement, which is shown as graduated KPM for 2019 were only 12% of graduated KPM on 2017 and 2018. Therefore, targeting of graduated-capable KPM became PKH policy objective, not only just ensuring the sosial assistence was on target, but also ensuring poverty alleviation by creating socially and economically independent KPM. To achieve this target, the Ministry of Social Affairs developed a accelerated-graduation strategy by adopting The Consultative Group to Assist the Poor/CGAP model. This research tried to analyze the process of the KPM PKH graduation strategy within the Results-Based Management (RBM) framework in Cianjur. RBM as approach of result-based strategic planning, focused on analyzing assumptions and risk to achieve each result at the output, outcome and impact level (UNDP, 2009). The main data collection used in-dept interviews with 21 informants that represented as the Central Government, Local Government, PKH Human Resources and KPM PKH in Cianjur. From this research resulted 5 (five) processes in the strategy used in Cianjur. There were first, accelerating changes in the mindset and behavior of KPM through Family Development Session; second, ensuring program complementarity for KPM; third, monitoring the socio-economic development of KPM and mapping of KPM's potential graduation; fourth, KPM entrepreneurship assistance; and the fifth meeting of potential KPM (Rembug KPM).

 

Abstrak. Berbagai penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) memberikan kontribusi positif terhadap peningkatan kondisi kesehatan, status gizi dan tingkat pendidikan Keluarga Penerima Manfaat (KPM). Namun demikian, kemampuan program dalam meningkatkan perekonomian keluarga masih sangat terbatas, yang tercermin dari rendahnya proporsi KPM yang lulus (graduasi) hingga 2019 hanya sekitar 12 persen dari KPM tahun 2017 dan 2018 yang graduasi. Oleh karenanya, targeting graduasi KPM berdaya menjadi arah kebijakan PKH saat ini, bukan lagi tentang sekedar memastikan bantuan tepat sasaran, namun utamanya bagaimana mengentaskan kemiskinan dengan menghasilkan KPM mandiri secara sosial dan ekonomi. Untuk mencapai target tersebut maka Kementerian Sosial mengembangkan strategi percepatan graduasi yang mengadopsi model graduasi The Consultative Group to Assist the Poor/CGAP. Penelitian ini mencoba menganalisis process terhadap strategi graduasi KPM PKH dalam kerangka Result Based Management (RBM) di Kabupaten Cianjur. RBM sebagai pendekatan perencanaan strategis berbasis hasil (result), berfokus pada analisis asumsi (assumption) dan risiko (risk) untuk mencapai masing-masing result pada level outputs, outcomes dan impact (UNDP, 2009). Pengumpulan data utama menggunakan in-dept interview pada 21 informan yang merupakan representasi Pemerintah Pusat, Pemerintah Daerah, Sumber Daya Manusia PKH dan KPM PKH di Kabupaten Cianjur. Hasil riset menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 5 (lima) proses dalam strategi graduasi yang digunakan di Kabupaten Cianjur. Diantaranya pertama, percepatan perubahan pola pikir dan perilaku KPM melalui Pertemuan Peningkatan Kemampuan Keluarga; kedua, memastikan komplementaritas program bagi KPM; ketiga, monitoring perkembangan sosial ekonomi KPM dan pemetaan KPM potensial graduasi; keempat, pendampingan kewirausahaan KPM; dan kelima pertemuan KPM potensial (Rembug KPM).


Keywords


Graduation Strategy; Strategi Graduasi; Program Keluarga Harapan;

References


Akatiga dan Kementerian Sosial. 2014. Mixed Method Process Monitoring and Evaluation of Family Development Session (FDS) in Indonesia’s PKH Program. Jakarta.

Badan Kebijakan Fiskal. (2016). Tinjauan ekonomi, keuangan dan fiskal: sinergi reformasi untuk mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi. Kementerian Keuangan Edisi V/Desember 2016.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Kabupaten Cianjur dalam Angka 2018. Cianjur: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Cianjur.

Budlender, Debbie. (2014). Conditional cash transfers: learning from the literature. Carribean: UN-Women Multi Country Office.

Chambers dan Conway. (1991). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concept for the 21th century. Institute of Development Studies.

Fiszbein dan Schady. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: reducing present and future poverty. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Hall and Midgley. (2004). Social policy for development. London: Sage Publication.

Hashemi, Syed. (2001). Linking microfinance and safety net programs to include the poorest. Focus Note 21. Washington, D.C: CGAP.

Hashemi, Syed M dan Montesquiou Aude de. (2011). Reaching the poorest: lessons from the graduation model. Focus Note 34. Washington, D.C: CGAP.

Inter-American Development Bank. (2015). Moving ahead: Recertification and Exit Strategies in Conditional Cash Transfer Programs. Inter American Development Bank.

Inter-American Development Bank. (2017). How conditional cash transfers work: good practices after 20 years of implementation. Inter American Development Bank.

Kementerian Sosial. (2016). Pedoman Operasional Pertemuan Peningkatan Kemampuan Keluarga Program Keluarga Harapan. Jakarta: Kemensos.

Kementerian Sosial. (2019). Rancangan Teknokratik Rencana Strategis Kementerian Sosial. Kemensos: Jakarta.

Kementerian Sosial. (2019). Pedoman pelaksanaan program keluarga harapan tahun 2019. Jakarta: Kemensos.

Krefting, Laura. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness from american journal of occupational therapy, 45(3): 214-222. http://qhr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/10/6/806 (diakses pada Oktober 2018)

Rawlings dan Rubio. (2005). Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. Oxford Journal University Press. Vol. 20, No. 1 (Spring 2005), 28-52.

Neuman, W Lawrence. (2014). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed). Pearson Education, Inc.

Premand, Maidoka dan Barry. (2017). Promoting positive parenting practices in Niger through a cash transfer programme. World Bank.

Rubin, Allen dan Babbie, Earl R. (2008). Research methods for social work. Seventh Edition. Canada: Cengange Learning.

Sach, D Jeffrey. (2005). The end of poverty: economic possibilities for our time. New York: The Penguin Press.

Schady et al. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: reducing present and future poverty. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Smeru Research Institute. (2009). Memantau dampak sosial ekonomi krisis keuangan global 2008/09 di indonesia. Juli–Oktober 2009. Jakarta: Smeru Research Institute.

Smeru Research Institute dan MAHKOTA. (2020). Penguatan peluang ekonomi keluarga penerima program keluarga harapan: studi kasus di empat kabupaten di jawa. Jakarta: Smeru Research Institute.

UNDG. (2011). Result-based management handbook: harmonizing RBM concepts and approaches for improved development results at country level. UNDG Group.

UNDG. (2010). Result-based management handbook: strengthening rbm harmonization for improved development result. UNDG Group.

UNDP. (2009). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for development results. www.undp.org diakses Juli 2019.

UN-ESCAP. (2011). The Promise of Protection Social Protection and Development in Asia and The Pacific. UN ESCAP.

UN-HABITAT. (2017). UN-HABITAT result-based management handbook. UN-HABITAT.

World Bank. (2017). Towards a comprehensive, integrated and effective social assistance system in indonesia. Jakarta: The World Bank Office Jakarta.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/empati.v9i2.18133

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 dini fajar yanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.