PENGEMBANGAN MODUL BIOLOGI BERBASIS INKUIRI TERBIMBING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK PADA RANAH AFEKTIF DAN PSIKOMOTORIK

Irwan Irwan, Maridi Maridi, Sri Dwiastuti

Abstract


DEVELOPMENT OF A MODULE OF BIOLOGY-BASED GUIDED INKUIRI TO EMPOWER LEARNERS ON THE AFFECTIVE AND PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAINS     

 

Abstract

This study aims to improve students’ affective and psychomotor performance through the development of guided-inquiry based biology modules. The research method used was research and development of Borg & Gall that has been modified. A cluster random sampling was conducted to determine 59 students. Data validation was conducted from experts, education practitioners and peers, and students. On average the score of the validation was in a good category with the value of 86.38, 92.71, and 91,80 respectively. With regards to the affective performance, there was a significant different of the score for both experimental and control group. The experimental group gained 81.75 (good) while the control group 65.76 (sufficient).  On the other hand, the average value for psychomotor performance was relatively higher with 92.53 (very good) for experimental group and 75.91 (good) for control group. The results of data analysis using the SPSS application (version 21) showed that the data in both classes were normally distributed and homogeneous so that they were continued with independent samples t-test. The results of statistical tests of affective domains show Tvalue>Ttabel (15.992> 2.002) and Sig. (2-tailed) 0.00 <0.005. Psychomotor domain data show Tvalue>Ttabel (18,312> 2,002) and Sig. (2-tailed) 0.00 <0.005. Based on these results it was concluded that the use of the guided inquiry-based biology modules was able to improve students’ affective and psychomotor performances.

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik pada ranah afektif dan psikomotorik melalui pengembangan modul biologi berbasis inkuiri terbimbing. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu research and development Borg&Gall yang telah dimodifikasi menjadi 9 tahap. Sampel penelitian diambil secara cluster random sampling sebanyak 59 orang. Hasil validasi pengembangan modul oleh para ahli diperoleh nilai rerata sebesar 86,38 dengan kategori baik, hasil validasi oleh praktisi pendidikan dan teman sejawat diperoleh nilai rerata sebesar 92,71 dengan kategori sangat baik, hasil validasi oleh 16 orang peserta didik diperoleh nilai rerata sebesar 91,80 dengan kategori sangat baik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rerata nilai hasil belajar peserta didik pada ranah afektif di kelas eksperimen sebesar 81,75 dengan kategori sangat baik dan di kelas kontrol sebesar 65,76 dengan kategori cukup. Rerata nilai hasil belajar peserta didik pada ranah psikomotorik di kelas eksperimen sebesar 92,53 dengan kategori sangat baik dan di kelas kontrol sebesar 75,91 dengan kategori baik. Hasil analisis data menggunakan aplikasi SPSS v.21 menunjukkan bahwa data di kedua kelas berdistribusi normal dan homogen sehingga dilanjutkan dengan uji independent sampel t-test. Hasil uji statistik data ranah afektif menunjukkan Thitung>TTabel (15,992>2,002) dan Sig. (2-tailed) 0,00<0,005. Data ranah psikomotorik menunjukkan Thitung>Ttabel (18,312>2,002) dan Sig. (2-tailed) 0,00<0,005. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut disimpulkan bahwa penggunaan modul biologi berbasis inkuiri terbimbing yang dikembangkan mampu meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik pada ranah afektif dan psikomotorik.

 


Keywords


modul; inkuiri terbimbing; hasil belajar; module; guided inquiry; learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Basuki, & Hariyanto. (2014). Asesmen Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Emily Greenleaf, Megan Burnett, P. G. (2008). Developing Learning Outomes: A Guide for University of Toronto Faculty. Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation, 25.

Farida, I. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Kurikulum Nasional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Forawi, S. A. (2016). Standard-based science education and critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.005.

Gengarelly, L. M., & Abrams, E. D. (2009). Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and the secondary science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9134-2.

Greenleaf, E., & Burnett, P. G. (2008). Developing Learning Outomes: A Guide for University of Toronto Faculty. Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation, 25.

Hamdani. (2011). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Jihad, A. & Haris, A. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Majid, A. (2017). Penilaian Autentik Proses dan Hasil Belajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mangurai, S. M. (2017). Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Menggunakan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Performance Assesment Pada Siswa XI IPA 1 SMA Kristen 1 Salatiga Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Edusains, 9(2), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.1.139.

Morgan, P. J. (2009). Robert Gagne ’ s Learning Outcomes Applications for Information Literacy Instruction. Retrieved from http://pamelajmorgan.org/publications/.

Munadi, Y. (2013). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: GP Press Group.

Prastowo. (2012). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press

Purwanto. (2013). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Rusche, S. N., & Jason, K. (2011). “You have to absorb yourself in it”: Using inquiry and reflection to promote student learning and self-knowledge. Teaching Sociology, 39(4), 338-353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X11418685.

Rusman. (2015). Model-model Pembelajaran. Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Santyasa. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pengembangan dan Teori Pengembangan Modul. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Sideeg, A. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy, Backward Design, and Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development in Crafting Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9252.

Simon, B., & Taylor, J. (2009). What is the value of course-specific learning goals? Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.43.

Syafrilianto, & Rahman, T. (2017). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Edusains, 9(2), 127–131.

https://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v9i2.2034

Sudaryono. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R& D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Ulva, N. M., Irawati, M. H., Syamsuri, I. (2014). Pengembangan Modul Bermuatan Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotorik Siswa Kelas X7 MAN Malang II Batu pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati. Abstrak Tesis. Perpustakaan Digital Universitas Negeri Malang.

University of Malta. (2009). Guidelines for the writing of effective learning outcomes. Malta: Academic Program Quality & Resources Unit.

Vlassi, M., & Karaliota, A. (2013). The Comparison between Guided Inquiry and Traditional Teaching Method. A Case Study for the Teaching of the Structure of Matter to 8th Grade Greek Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.226.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i1.9586 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Irwan Irwan, Maridi Maridi, Sri Dwiastuti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

EDUSAINS.  P-ISSN:1979-7281;E-ISSN:2443-1281

 Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounterView My Stats

 

Â