PROFILE OF SCHOOL READINESS IN APPLYING STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, MATHEMATIC) EDUCATION

Yanti Herlanti, Usawatun Amalia, Ai Nurlaela

Abstract


STEM knowledge and skills are needed by students in order to survive in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0. This study aims to determine the level of readiness of public high schools in Bogor City in implementing STEM education. Descriptive research with survey method with stratified sample selection. The number of samples is three principals, nine science teachers, and 75 students. The research instrument was in the form of a questionnaire assessing readiness from aspects of the curriculum, supporting extracurriculars, admission selection, and STEM supporting facilities as well as students' interest in STEM. Data analysis uses a modified readiness score according to Aydin & Tascy (2005). The findings of the study show that public high schools in the city of Bogor are ready to implement STEM education. Readiness to apply STEM education is shown by the Principal. Students also showed readiness to apply STEM education, but needed a little improvement. As for the teacher, it shows unpreparedness and needs improvement.

PROFIL  KESIAPAN SEKOLAH SMA NEGERI KOTA BOGOR DALAM MENERAPKAN PENDIDIKAN STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, MATHEMATIC)

Abstrak

Pengetahuan dan keterampilan STEM diperlukan peserta didik agar dapat bertahan pada era revolusi industry 4.0. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kesiapan sekolah SMA Negeri di Kota Bogor dalam menerapkan pendidikan STEM. Penelitian deskriptif dengan metode survei dengan pemilihan sampel secara stratafikasi.  Jumlah sampel adalah tiga orang kepala sekolah, sembilan orang guru Sains, dan 75 orang peserta didik. Instrumen penelitian berupa angket menilai kesiapan dari aspek kurikulum, ekstrakuler penunjang, seleksi masuk, dan fasilitas penunjang STEM serta minat peserta didik terhadap STEM.  Analisis data menggunakan skor kesiapan menurut Aydin & Tascy (2005) yang telah dimodifikasi. Temuan penelitian menunjukan SMA Negeri di Kota Bogor siap menerapkan pendidikan STEM. Kesiapan penerapan pendidikan STEM ditunjukkan oleh Kepala Sekolah.  Peserta didik pun menunjukkan kesiapan penerapan pendidikan STEM, namun perlu sedikit peningkatan.  Adapun dari guru, menunjukkan ketidaksiapan dan perlu peningkatan.


How To Cite: Yanti, H., Amalia, U., Nurlela, A. (2022). Profil  Kesiapan Sekolah Sma Negeri Kota Bogor Dalam Menerapkan Pendidikan Stem (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematic). EDUSAINS, 14 (1) : 14-23.


Keywords


Industrial Revolution 4.0, School readliness, STEM education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asy Syifa, D.N. (2018). Pengaruh Kegiatan Ekskul Robotik Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Usia MI/SD. Skripsi: PGMI, FITK, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Ayadin, C.H. & Tasci, D. (2005). Measuring Readiness for e-Learning: Reflections from an Emerging Country. Educational Technology & Society 8(4), pp. 244-257

Bybee, R.W. (2014). The Case for STEM Education Chalngges and Opportunities. NSTA Press.

Ekcman, E.W., William, A. & Thorn, B.S. (2016). An Integrated Model for STEM Teacher Preparation: The value of teaching cooperative educational experience. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 51(1), pp 71-81. http://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE51.1Eckman

Fathoni, A., Muslim, E., Rijanto, T., Munoto, & Nurlaela, L. (2020). STEM: Inovasi dalam Pembelajaran Vokasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan. 17(1), pp 33-42.

Freeman, B., Tytler, R., & Marginson, S. (2019). An International View of STEM Education. Chapter in STEM Education 2.0. pp 350-363. DOI: 10.1163/9789004405400_019

Harahap, N.J. & Rafika, M. (2020). Revolution 4.0: and The Impact on Human Resources. Journal Ecobisma, 7(1), pp 89-96. https://doi.org/10.36987/ecobi.v7i1.1545

Harland, D.J. (2011). STEM Student research handbook. NSTA Press.

James A. Ejiwale, J.A. (2013). Barriers to Successful Implementation of pendidikan STEM. Journal of Education of Learning. Vol.7 (2), pp 63-74

Kaleva, S, Pursiainen, J., Hakola, M., Rusanen, J., & Muukkonen, H. (2019). Student’s reasons for STEM Choices and The Relationship of Mathematics Choice to Universitas Admission. International Journal of STEM Education: 6(42) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0196-x

Karnawati, D. (2017). Revolusi industry, 75% pekerjaan akan hilang. Tersedia online di: https://ekbis.sindonews.com/berita/1183599/34/revolusi-industri-75-jenis-pekerjaan-akan-hilang

Kelley, T.R., Knowles, J.G.(2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. IJSTEM Ed 3, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kemdikbud (2020). Kemendikbud Selenggarakan KIHAJAR STEM 2020 Wujudkan Generasi Pelajar Pancasila. Tersedia online di https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/10/kemendikbud-selenggarakan-kihajar-stem-2020-wujudkan-generasi-pelajar-pancasila

Latip, A. & Hardinata, A. (2020). Implementation of STEM Robotics as High School Intra-curicular. Journal of Natural Science Teaching: Thabiea, 3(1), pp 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v3i1.6770

Makgato, M. (2019). STEM for Sustainable Skill for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Snapshot at Some TVET Collage in South Afrika. Book Chapter: Theorizing STEM Education in 21st Century. Tersedia online di: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/69249

Maryika, J. (2017). Technology, jobs, and the future of work. McKinsey Global Institut: Executif Briefing May, 24. Tersedia online di https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/technology-jobs-and-the-future-of-work

Marzano, R.J. & Pickering, D.J. (1997). Dimensions of Learning. Alexanderia, Virginia, USA: ASCD

Miselina, R. & Muhid, A. (2020). Pengaruh Kegiatan Robotik Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Usia SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 6(1), pp 136-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29407/jpdn.v6i1.14555

Mislevy, J., & Gerard, S. (2015). Measuring the monitoring progress K-12 STEM education indicators: A road map. SRI Education.

NSTA (2020). Position Statement: STEM Education on Teaching and Learning. Tersedia online di https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/stem-education-teaching-and-learning

Oyer, B. (2015). Teacher Perpeptions of Principals’s Confidence, Humility, and Effectiveness: Implication for Educational Leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 25, pp 684-719.

Schlosser, J., McAree, O., & Mohtadi, C. (2014). Bridging the Skills Gap in STEM Industries. Conference paper: SEFI2014, 42th Annual Conference, Brimingham, United Kingdom. P

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means how to respond. World Economic Forum. Tersedia onlinde di: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/

Sudiono, A. (2015). USAID Perkuat Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi di Indonesia. Beritasaru 22 Januari. Tersedia online di https://www.beritasatu.com/archive/242679/usaid-perkuat-metode-pembelajaran-berbasis-teknologi-di-indonesia

Tyler-Wood, T., Knezek, G., & Chistensen, R.R. (2010). Instruments for Assesing Interest in STEM Content and Careers. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 18(2), pp. 341-363

Wilson, S.M., (2011). Effective STEM Teacher Preparation, Induction, and Professional Development. Washington DC:Research Council's Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K–12 Schools, May 11-12

Winarni, J., Zubaidah, S., & Koes, H.S. (2016). STEM: Apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana. Proseding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1, pp 976-984.

Wojnowski, B.S. & Pea, C.H. Editors. (2014). Model and Approach to STEM Professional Development. NSTA Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v14i1.25541 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

EDUSAINS.  P-ISSN:1979-7281
;E-ISSN:2443-1281

 Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounterView My Stats