DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE TEST TO MEASURE HOTS AND DIGITAL LITERACY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ON THE TOPIC OF CITY NOISE
Abstract
PENGEMBANGAN SCIENCE TEST UNTUK MENGUKUR HOTS DAN DIGITAL LITERACY SISWA SMP PADA TEMA KEBISINGAN KOTA
Abstract
The 2013 Curriculum emphasizes the process to improve HOTS and digital literacy. However, no appropriate science test instrument can measure the combination of these two aspects in contextual topics and relate to real-world problems. This kind of science test will engage students in-depth thinking as well as improve their digital literacy. This research aims to develop science tests based on HOTS and digital literacy in the City Noise theme for 8th-grade students. HOTS is operationally defined as critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and communication (4C), while digital literacy is a thinking and operation skill. Borg & Gall models were adopted in this research and development. A total of 21 private school students in Semarang were subject to this research and investigated the validity and reliability of developed science tests. Based on expert judgment, the science test instrument, which consists of 25 multiple choice items and five essay items, was in a very good category. Based on the Rasch model analysis, the science tests are valid (28 items are valid) and reliable (Alpha cronbach=0.79). It can be concluded that the developed science test is feasible to use to measure HOTS and digital literacy of junior high school students on the topic of the City Noise.
Abstrak
Kurikulum 2013 menekankan pada proses peningkatan HOTS dan digital literacy. Namun, belum banyak tersedia instrumen tes sains yang mampu mengukur kombinasi dari kedua aspek tersebut dalam topik yang kontekstual dan berhubungan dengan masalah nyata. Jenis science test seperti ini dapat melibatkan siswa dalam proses berpikir mendalam serta dapat meningkatkan digital literacy. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu mengembangkan science test berbasis HOTS dan digital literacy pada tema Kebisingan Kota untuk siswa kelas 8. HOTS secara operasional didefinisikan sebagai critical thinking, creativity, collaboration and communication (4C) sementara digital literacy sebagai thinking skills dan operation skills. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan (R&D) yang mengadaptasi dari Borg & Gall. Sebanyak 21 siswa dari SMP swasta di Semarang digunakan sebagai subjek dalam penelitian ini dan digunakan untuk mengetahui validitas dan reliabilitas science test hasil pengembangan. Berdasarkan hasil validasi ahli, instrumen science test yang terdiri dari 25 item pilihan ganda dan 5 item uraian termasuk dalam kategori baik. berdasarkan hasil analisis Rasch model, science test dikatakan valid (28 item valid) dan reliabel (Alpha Cronbach=0,79). Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa science test hasil pengembangan layak digunakan untuk mengukur HOTS dan digital literacy siswa SMP pada tema Kebisingan Kota.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, D., Sumintono, B., & Mohamed, A. (2018). E-learning readiness among students of diverse backgrounds in a leading Malysian higher education institution. 15(2), 227–256.
Astuti, W. P., Prasetyo, A. P. B., & Rahayu, E. S. (2012). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen autentik berbasis literasi sains pada materi sistem ekskresi. Journal UNNES, 43(2), 94–102.
Bambang, S., & Wahyu, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan Rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Cimahi: Penerbit Trim Komunikata.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research an introduction (4th ed.). New York: Logman, Inc.
Budiman, A., & Jailani. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen higher order thinking skill (HOTS) pada mata pelajaran matematika SMP kelas VIII semester 1. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2671
Chan, B. S. K., Churchill, D., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2017). Digital literacy learning in higher education through digital storytelling approach. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v13i1.9907
Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. (2010). Juknis penyusunan perangkat penilaian afektif di SMA. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.
Eryansyah, Erlina, Fiftinova, & Nurweni, A. (2019). EFL students â€TM needs of digital literacy to meet the demands of 21 st century skills. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 3(2), 442–460.
Hall, M., Nix, I., & Baker, K. (2013). Student experiences and perceptions of digital literacy skills development: Engaging learners by design? Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 11(3), 207–225.
Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. Bin, Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. Bin, Mohaffyza, M., & Mohamad, B. (2011). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Education Students. 1(2).
Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno. (2014). Pengembangan tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika (PsyTHOTS) peserta didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12.
Jailani, J., Sugiman, S., & Apino, E. (2017). Implementing the problem-based learning in order to improve the students’ HOTS and characters. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.17674
Khalid, M. A. F., Badusah, J., Mansor, A. Z., Karim, A. A., Daud, M. Y., Din, R., & Zulkefle, D. F. (2016). The application of 21st century ict literacy model among teacher trainees. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468771011032778
Khasanah, U., & Herina, H. (2019). Membangun karakter siswa melalui literasi digital dalam menghadapi pendidikan abad 21 (revolusi industri 4.0). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 21, 999–1015.
Khatri, P., Singh, S. R., Belani, N. K., Yeong, Y. L., Lohan, R., Lim, Y. W., & Teo, W. Z. Y. (2020). Corrigendum to <’ YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study of English and Mandarin content’>. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 36, 101821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101821
Kurnia, N., & Astuti, S. I. (2017). Peta gerakan literasi digital di indonesia: studi tentang pelaku, ragam kegiatan, kelompok sasaran dan mitra. Informasi, 47(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v47i2.16079
Kurniawati, N., Maolida, E. H., & Anjaniputra, A. G. (2018). The praxis of digital literacy in the EFL classroom: Digital-immigrant vs digital-native teacher. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11459
Kusuma, M. D., Rosidin, U., Abdurrahman, A., & Suyatna, A. (2017). The development of higher order thinking skill (HOTS) instrument assessment in physics study. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 7(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701052632
Lathifah, I. N., & Wilujeng, I. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran integrated science berbasis kearifan lokal. Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Sains, 4(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v4i2.12943
Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Developing higher level thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 9.
Marsh, J., Hannon, P., Lewis, M., & Ritchie, L. (2017). Young children’s initiation into family literacy practices in the digital age. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15582095
Mullis, I., & Martin, M. O. (2014). TIMSS Advanced 2015 Assesment Framework. Chesnut Hills: Boston College.
NEA. (2012). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “four Cs.” Washington DC: NEA.
Nisa, N. C., Nadiroh, N., & Siswono, E. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Hots) Tentang Lingkungan Berdasarkan Latar Belakang Akademik Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Lingkungan Dan Pembangunan, 19(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21009/plpb.192.01
Nurwahidah, I. (2018). Pengembangan soal penalaran model TIMSS untuk mengukur high order thinking (HOT). Thabiea : Journal of Natural ScienceTeaching, 1(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i1.3874
Ouahidi, L. M. (2020). Constraints on developing digital literacy skills in higher education. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 3(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.2.22
Paige, K., Bentley, B., & Dobson, S. (2016). Slowmation: A twenty-first century educational tool for science and mathematics pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n2.1
Pratiwi, N., & Pritanova, N. (2017). Pengaruh literasi digital terhadappsikologis anakdan remaja. Semantik, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v6i1p11.250
Reimers, F., Schleicher, A., Saavedra, J., & Tuominen, S. (2020). Supporting the continuation of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oecd, 1–38.
Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, K., Apino, E., & Risqa, D. A. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230s.
Saptono, S., Rustaman, N. Y., Saefudin, & Widodo, A. (2013). Model integrasi atribut asesmen formatif (IAAF) dalam pembelajaran biologi sel untuk mengembangkan kemampuan penalaran dan berpikir analitik mahasiswa calon guru. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2507
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (Revisi). Cimahi: Penerbit Trim Komunikata.
Techataweewan, W., & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.07.001
UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. In Unesco.org.
Vélez, A. P., & Zuazua, I. I. (2017). Digital literacy and cyberconvivencia in primary education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237(June 2016), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.050
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21 st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Wargadinata, W., Maimunah, I., Dewi, E., & Rofiq, Z. (2020). Student’s responses on learning in the early COVID-19 pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 5(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.6153
Widana, I. W. (2017). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment (HOTS). JISAE, 3(1), 32–44.
Widana, I. W. (2018). Higher order thinking skills assessment towards critical thinking on mathematics lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74
Zhou, T., Huang, S., Cheng, J., & Xiao, Y. (2020). The distance teaching practice of combined mode of massive open online course micro-video for interns in emergency department during the COVID-19 epidemic period. Telemedicine and E-Health, 26(5), 584–588. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0079.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i2.17609 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Indri Nurwahidah, Yeni Widiyawati, Dwi Septiana Sari, Mohammad Masykuri, Cucuk Wawan Budiyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
EDUSAINS. P-ISSN:1979-7281;E-ISSN:2443-1281
Â
Â