Reformulation of Asset Recovery Strategy Resulting from Corruption Crimes as an Effort to Recover State Losses
Abstract
It is time for the state to prioritize asset recovery for state losses resulting from criminal acts of corruption. Asset recovery must be an integral part of the series of actions taken against criminal acts of corruption. However, currently the arrangements for recovering criminal assets in Indonesia are not yet synergistic and overlapping. The asset recovery process is carried out by several agencies, giving rise to sectoral egos and lengthy coordination. This results in the recovery of criminal assets in Indonesia as an effort to recover losses from criminal acts being not optimal. This research aims to recommend strategies for recovering criminal assets in Indonesia to produce efficient asset recovery. The research method used is normative juridical using a statutory approach, comparative analysis, concept analysis and case analysis. The research results found that the suboptimal asset recovery in Indonesia was caused by disharmony in the asset recovery arrangements themselves. Indonesia can reflect on the criminal asset recovery mechanisms in the United States, United Kingdom and Italy in harmonizing asset recovery arrangements. This research also found that harmonization of asset recovery arrangements in Indonesia should be accommodated through the through the amendment of KUHAP. Through the harmonization of these arrangements, The Attorney General's Office of Indonesia as law enforcement agency that has the authority to carry out investigations, prosecutions, execution court decisions that have permanent legal force appointed as the coordinator of asset recovery for criminal acts so that the recovery of assets, especially those resulting from criminal acts of corruption, can be well synergized and state losses recovery to be optimal.
References
Book
Brun, Jean-Pierre, et al. Asset Recovery Handbook A Guide for Practitioners. 2nd ed. Washington DC: Star Initiative, 2021.
Dery, Alice W. Overview of Asset Forfeiture. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2012. Elsayed, S. Cryptocurrencies, Corruption, and Organised Crime. Berlin: Transparency International, 2023.
Financial Action Task Force. Best Practices on Confiscation (Recommendations 4 And 38) And A Framework for Ongoing Work on Asset Recovery. Paris: Financial Action Task Force, 2012.
Herimulyanto, Agustinus. Sita Berbasis Nilai Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bantul: Genta Publishing, 2019.
Jon Petter Rui dan Ulrich Sieber (Eds.). Non- Conviction Based Confiscation in Europe. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2015.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Model Ideal Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
Journal
Alexander, Richard C. “"Cost Savings" As Proceeds of Crime: A Comparative Study of the United States and the United Kingdom.” American Bar Association. Vol. 45, No. 3 (2011).
Alexander, Richard. “In the Chaos of Brexit, What about Asset Recovery?” Journal of Financial Crime. Vol. 26, No. 2 (2019).
Candler, Linda J. “Tracing and Recovering Proceeds of Crime in Fraud Cases: A Comparison of U.S. and U.K. Legislation.” The International Lawyer. Vol. 31, No. 1 (1997).
Cassella, Stefan D. “Overview of asset forfeiture law in the United States.” South African Journal of Criminal Justice. Vol. 17. No. 3 (2004).
Gius, Mark. “The Effect of Civil and Criminal Forfeitures on Drug-Related Arrests.”Justice Policy Journal. Vol. 15. No. 1 (2018).
Pratama, Putra dan Nursiti. “Penyitaan Barang Bukti Milik Pihak Ketiga Yang Dirampas Oleh Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jantho Kabupaten Aceh Besar).” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala. Vol. 3, No. 3 (2019).
Sudarto. “Mekanisme Perampasan Aset Dengan Menggunakan Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS. Vol. IV. No. 2 (2017).
Twomey, John H. dan Susan A. Laniewski. “The United States Marshals Service Role In The Attorney General’s War on The Violent Crime.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Vol. 73, No. 3 (1982).
Webb, Philippa. “The UNCAC Global Achievement or Missed Opportunity?” Journal of International Economic Law. Vol. 8. No. 1 (2005).
Institutions and Organizations
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. Audit KUHAP Studi Evaluasi terhadap Keberlakuan Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2022.
Pusat Analisa Kebijakan Hukum dan Ekonomi. Urgensi Pembentukan Badan Regulasi Nasional. Jakarta: Pusat Analisa Kebijakan Hukum dan Ekonomi, 2020.
US. Department of Justice. The Attorney General’s Guidelines on the Asset Forfeiture Program. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, 2018.
US. Department of Justice. Asset Forfeiture Policy Manual. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, 2021.
US. Department of Justice Criminal Division. Asset Forfeiture Policy Manual. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division, 2023.
Dissertation
Cakraputra, Asep Kurniawan. “Konsep Analisis Financial Intelligence pada Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Keuangan Dalam Pembaharuan Penegakan Hukum Pidana.” Disertasi Doktor Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, 2023.
Judicial Decision
Mahkamah Agung. Putusan Kasasi No. 173 K/Pid.Sus/2016. RI melawan Andianto Setiabudi, dkk. (2016).
Pengadilan Negeri Kepanjen. Putusan No. 46/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Kpn. Hasan melawan Pemerintah RI Cq. Kejaksaan Agung RI Cq. Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Timur Cq. Kejari Kepanjen Kabupaten Malang Cq. Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Perkara Pidana Nomor 870/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Kpn (2018).
Regulations
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Italian Code of Criminal Procedure Italian Constitution.
Pedoman Tentang Tata Kelola Benda Sitaan, Barang Bukti, dan Barang Rampasan Negara di Lingkungan Kejaksaan RI. Pedoman Nomor 2 Tahun 2022.
Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Tentang Tata Cara Pengelolaan Benda Sitaan Negara Dan Barang Rampasan Negara Pada Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan Negara. Permenkumham Nomor 16 Tahun 2014.
Undang-Undang Tentang Bantuan Timbal Balik dalam Masalah Pidana. UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2006. LN Tahun 2006 No. 18, TLN No. 4607.
Undang-Undang Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. UU Nomor 16 Tahun 2004. LN Tahun 2004 No. 67, TLN No. 4401. Sebagaimana diubah oleh UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. LN Tahun 2021 No. 298, TLN No. 6755.
Undang-Undang Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. LN Tahun 2023 No. 1, TLN No. 6842.
Undang-Undang Tentang Narkotika. UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2009. LN Tahun 2009 No.143, TLN No. 5062.
Undang-Undang Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011. LN Tahun 2011 No. 82, TLN No. 5234. Sebagaimana diubah terakhir oleh UU Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. LN Tahun 2022 No. 143, TLN No. 6801.
Undang-Undang Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. UU Nomor 3 Tahun 1971. LN Tahun 1971.
Undang-Undang Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1999. LN Tahun 1999 No. 140, TLN No. 3874. Sebagaimana diubah oleh UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. UU No. 20 Tahun 2001. LN Tahun 2001 No. 134, TLN No. 4150.
Undang-Undang Tentang Penagihan Pajak Dengan Surat Paksa. UU Nomor 19 Tahun 1997. LN Tahun 1997 No. 42, TLN No. 368. Sebagaimana diubah oleh UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2000 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 1997 tentang Bea Perolehan Hak atas Tanah dan Bangunan. LN Tahun 2000 No. 130 TLN. No. 3988.
Undang-Undang Tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan. UU Nomor 18 Tahun 2013. LN Tahun 2013 No. 130, TLN No. 5432.
Undang-Undang Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. UU No. 8 Tahun 2010. LN Tahun 2010 No. 122, TLN No. 5164.
Undang-Undang Tentang Pengesahan United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 2003 (Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Anti Korupsi, 2003). UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2006. LN Tahun 2006 No. 32, TLN No. 4620.
Undang-Undang Tentang Pengesahan United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Menentang Tindak Pidana Transnasional Yang Terorganisasi). UU No. 5 Tahun 2009. LN Tahun 2009 No. 5, TLN No. 4960.
Undang-Undang Tentang Pengusutan, Penuntutan, dan Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Prp Tahun 1960.
Undang-Undang Tentang Peraturan Tentang Hukum Pidana. UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1946.
Website
College of Policing. “Confiscation and Recovery.” College of Policing, 1 Agustus 2018. Tersedia pada https://www.college.police.uk/app/investigation/investigative-stra tegies/financial-investigation/asset-recovery/confiscation-and-recovery.
College of Policing. “Cash Seizure.” College of Policing, 24 Juni 2021. Tersedia pada https://www.college.police.uk/app/investigation/investigative-strategies/financial- investigation/asset-reco very/cash-seizure..
Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan. “Panduan Rupbasan.” Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan, 2018. Tersedia pada Panduan RUPBASAN (ditjenpas.go.id).
Farisa, Fitria Chusna. “Menanti Penelusuran Aset Indra Kenz dan Doni Salmanan, Mungkinkah Uang Korban Kembali?” Kompas.com, 10 Maret 2022. Tersedia pada https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/3/10/08401101/menanti-penelusuran-aset- indra-kenz-dan-doni-salmanan-mungkinkah-uang-korban.
Home Office. “Policy Paper Asset Recovery Action Plan.” Home Office, 13 September 2019. Tersedia pada https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/asset-recover y-action-plan/asset-recovery-action-plan.
Institute For Criminal Justice Reform. “ICJR Dorong Reformasi Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan Negara (Rupbasan) dan Eksekusi Barang Sitaan. Institute For Criminal Justice Reform, 18 April 2016. Tersedia pada https://icjr.or.id/icjr-dorong-reformasi-rumah-penyimpanan-benda-sitaan-negara-rupbasan-dan-eksek usi-barang-sitaan/.
KPK RI. “Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan dan Rampasan KPK.” KPK RI. Dipublikasikan tanggal 26 September 2022. Durasi video: 03-39. Tersedia pada https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIU-hxsbQEg.
National Crime Agency. “Criminal Asset Denial.” National Crime Agency. Tersedia pada https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIU-hxsbQEg.
Wahl, Thomas. “Commission Assesses EU’s Asset Recovery and Confiscation Regime.” Eucrim, 14 Agustus 2020. Tersedia pada https://eucrim.eu/news/commission- assesses-eus-asset-recovery-and-confiscation-regime/.
Wallenfeldt, Jeff. “Brexit United Kingdom Referendum Proposal.” Britannica, 30 Maret 2023. Tersedia pada https://www.britannica.com/topic/Brexit.
Weld, Jean B. “Forfeiture Laws And Procedures In The United States Of America.” UNAFEI. Tersedia pada https://www.unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No83/No 83_06VE_Weld1.pdf.
World Bank. “Italian Asset Recovery Tools & Procedures. A Practical Guide for International Cooperation.” World Bank, 1 September 2012. Tersedia pada https://star.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/g20-asset-recovery-guide-2013-italy_1.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v12i2.39768 Abstract - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
