Al-Asrâr fî Tikrâr Hiwâr al-Nabi Musa wa al-‘Abd fî Sûrah al-Kahfi: Tahlîl al-Îjâz wa al-Ithnâb

Abdul Latif, Muhammad Afif Amrulloh, Hanik Mahliatussikah, Intan Muflihah, Yeni Lailatul Wahidah

Abstract


The problem in this study it is the reason why Prophet Khidr repeated his words -You will not patient with me -  to the prophet Moses, even though the prophet Moses was known as the intelligent prophet. This research uses the theory of ijaz and ithnab (brevity and redundancy) in the science of rhetoric. This theory finds abbreviated word types and extended word types. This research uses a qualitative approach that is descriptive through a literature review. Researcher found there are sixteen ijaz sentences including sentences by removing related sentences, five sentences by removing adjectives, one sentence by removing letters, one sentence by removing dispersed words, one sentence by removing the divine predicate, one sentence miracle of delivering sentences. The four ithnab sentences that the researcher found are as follows. First, the expressive sentences by mentioning special sentences after mentioning general sentences that serve to emphasize specific sentences. Secondly, the redundancy sentence is the appendix by bringing up the second sentence which is similar to the first sentence that intends to emphasize the idea of the sentence. Third, verbosity sentences that use the inclusion allowance that serve to explain the previous sentence and which are not yet clear. Fourth, verbosity and repetition sentences that work to persuade the other person to accept the advice. The reason why ‘Abd’ repeated his words to the prophet Moses was not because Moses was stupid, but because of Prophet Moses' spirit in seeking knowledge and allowing him to continue searching for guidance with the ‘Abd’.

Keywords: Advice, Repetition, Spirit.


Full Text:

PDF

References


محمد علي الصابوني، صفوة التفاسير، مدينة: دار الصابوني، الطبعة العاشرة، المجلد الثاني، 1399ه.

ابن منظور: لسان العرب:مادة «وجز»، القاهرة: دار المعارف،1119م.

احمد مطلوب ، معجم المصلحات البلاغية، بيروت:الدار العربية للموسوعات، 2006م، الجزءالأول.

خلف الله، ومحمد زغلول: ثلاث رسائل في إعجاز القرآن، مصر:دار المعارف، 1976م، الطبعة الثالثة.

أحمد الهاشمي، جواهر البلاغة في المعاني والبيان والبديع، مصر:المكتبة العصرية، 1999م.

إبن سنان الخفاجي، سر الفصاحة، القاهرة: دار الكتب العلمية، 1982م.

ضياء الدين ابن أثیر، المثل السائر في أدب الكاتب والشاعر، القاهرة: دار نهضة، 2008م، الجزءالثاني.

أبي هلال العسكري، كتاب الصناعتين الكتابة والشعر، مصر: مكتبة عيسى البابي الحلبي، 1952م.

Abu Zaid, Nasr Hamid, Tekstualitas Alquran. (Yogyakarta: LKiS, Cet I, 2001) Terj. Khairon Nahdiyyin, hal.100.

Ash Shiddiqieqy, Hasbi, Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Alquran/Tafsir, (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, Cet XIII, 1990.

Mardalis, Metode Penelitian Sebuah Pendekatan Proposal, Jakarta:PT.Bumi Aksara,2002.

Mushodiq, Muhamad Agus, “Perilaku Patologis Pada Kisah Nabi Musa Dan ‘Abd Dalam Alquran: Telaah Epistemologi al-Jâbirî dan Semiotika Peirce,” ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam 19, no. 1 (June 25, 2018): 69–97, https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v19i1.4816.

Syaripudin, Ahmad, Abas Asyafah, and Udin Supriadi, “Konsep Pendidikan Pada Kisah Nabi Khidir As Dengan Nabi Musa As Dalam Alquran Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Konsep Pendidikan Islam,” TARBAWY : Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education 5, no. 2 (November 16, 2018): 137–49, https://doi.org/10.17509/t.v5i2.16750.

Thahir, A. Halil and Ahmad Mughni Khoiruddin, “Pesan Moral Dibalik Kisah Nabi Musa Dan Nabi Khidir Dalam Qs. Al-Kahfi (Studi Atas Penafsiran al-Razi Dalam Mafatih al-Ghayb),” QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (December 15, 2020): 229–46, https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v4i2.2581.

.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v9i2.28892 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

CrossRef ebsco DOAJ sinta Google Scholar Advanced Sciences Index (ASI) MoraRef MoraRef


 

License

© Copyright CC BY-SA

web analytics View My Stats

Arabiyat, p-ISSN: 2356-153X, e-ISSN: 2442-9473