Comparison of Outcomes of Hemodialysis Adequacy with Dialysate Flow Rate of 500 ml/minute and 650 ml/minute

Leo Ginting, Anggraini Permatasari, Elizsabeth Yasmine, Dheni Koerniawan


Background. The average achievement of hemodialysis adequacy which was carried out twice a week for 4 hours at Fatmawati Hospital was 1.49. As many as 82% had not reached adequate dialysis (Kt/V<1.8). Based on the calculation of the dialysate proportioning system, hemodialysis for 4 hours with a dialysate flow rate/Quick Dialysate Flow (QD) of 500 ml/minute will leave dialysate. In the 1 month observation, there were 1.755.6 liters residual dialysate parts Acid (A) and 6,283.2 liters parts Bicarbonate (B). This residual puts a burden on the hospital in treating liquid waste. But with QD 650 ml/minute, both part A and part B, dialysate is still sufficient. On the other hand, QD can affect the achievement of HD compliance.

Aim. Knowing the difference in hemodialysis adequacy with QD 500 ml/minute and 650 ml / minute.

Method. This study used a case-control analysis for the control group (QD 500 ml/minute) and the intervention group (QD 650 ml/minute) with a Quasy Experiment design through a comparative analysis approach with matching/cross over techniques. Hemodialysis adequacy (Kt/V) is measured 2 times using the QX calculate application (Daugirdas formula), namely at QD 500 ml/minute and QD 650 ml/minute for further analysis using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.

Result. The study was conducted on 115 respondents with a total of 230 HD sessions. The mean Kt/V in the intervention group was 1.69 and in the control group 1.49 (p-value = 0.006) and it was seen that there was a shift in the achievement of HD adequacy to a better category; The very inadequate and inadequate adequacy category decreased from QD 500 ml/minute to QD 650 ml/minute, and conversely, the adequate and very adequate adequate category experienced an increase in number.

Conclusion. Hemodialysis with QD 650 ml/minute resulted in better hemodialysis adequacy than QD 500 ml/minute.


adequacy of hemodialysis, dialysate, hemodialysis, QD


Azar AT. (2009). Increasing dialysate flow rate increases dialyzer urea clearance and dialysis efficiency: an in vivo study”, Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2009 Nov;20(6):1023-9. Available in dari Https:// 24 jan 2019, at 20.45 WIB

Cha, Sun Mi dan Hye Sook Min. (2016). The Effect of Dialysate Flow Rate on Dialysis Adequacy and Fatigue in Hemodialysis Patients. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2016.46.5.642. Korean Society of Nursing Science. Available in pada 3 April 2019, at14.15 WIB

Daugirdas JT. (2015). Physiologic principles and urea kinetic modeling. In: Daugirdas JT, Blake PG, Ing TS (eds). Handbook of dialysis. 5th ed. P.43

Hauk M (2000). In vivo effects of dialysate flow rate on Kt/V in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 Jan;35(1):105-11. Https:// at 6 Jan 2019, 13.30 WIB

Indonesian Renal Registry (2017). 10 th Report Of Indonesian Renal Registry. Https:// 9 Januari 2019, at 13.30 WIB.

JK, Leypold, Cheung Ak. (2001). Increases in mass transfer-area coefficients and urea Kt/V with increasing dialysate flow rate are greater for high-flux dialyzers. Jurnal of National Center Biotechnology Information. Available in, pada 16 September 2019, at 20.00 WIB

JP, Bhimanim, Ouseph R & Ward RA. (2010). Effect of increasing dialysate flow rate on diffusive mass transfer of urea, phosphate and beta2-microglobulin during clinical haemodialysis. 25(12):3990-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq326. Epub 2010 Jun 13. Available in, pada 16 September 2019, at 20.30 WIB.

Krahn RE, dkk (2019). Effect of Bicarbonate-Buffered Dialysate on Ventricular Arrhythmias in Hemodialysis Patients. 2019;49(1):74-80. doi: 10.1159/000495846. Epub 2019. Available in Https://, pada 16 Januari 2019, at 20.00 WIB

Yu Q, Bai Y.(2013). Analysis of a single hemodialysis on phosphate removal of the internal fistula patients by mathematical and statistical methods. 2013: 856897Published online 2013 Dec 24. doi: 10.1155/2013/856897. Available in pada 20 September 2019, at 20.00 WIB

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/avicenna.v2i1.18215


  • There are currently no refbacks.