FROM SANAD TO ALGORITHM: AUTHORITY, RATIONALITY, AND PARTICIPATORY INTERPRETATION OF UṢŪL AL-DĪN IN CYBERSPACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15408/iu.vi.50233Keywords:
Digital Hermeneutics, Ushūl al-Dīn, Religious Authority, Rationality.Abstract
The proliferation of digital media has fundamentally transformed the production, circulation, and legitimation of religious knowledge, including the discipline of uṣūl al-dīn as the foundation of Islamic theology. Traditional structures of authority rooted in scholarly chains of transmission (sanad) and institutional recognition are increasingly mediated by algorithmic visibility, engagement metrics, and participatory interaction within networked digital environments. This study examines how these transformations reshape both the authority and rationality of Islamic theological discourse in cyberspace. Employing a qualitative approach grounded in digital discourse analysis, data were collected through non-participant observation of theological content and interactions on social media platforms, and analyzed using thematic and critical discourse frameworks. The findings reveal a significant epistemic shift from sanad-based legitimacy toward forms of performative and algorithmic authority, where visibility, emotional resonance, and communicative accessibility play central roles. The rationality of kalām, traditionally characterized by systematic and deductive argumentation, has been rearticulated into concise, modular, and visually mediated forms adapted to digital communication structures. Furthermore, theological interpretation emerges as a participatory and dialogical process involving both content creators and audiences, resulting in fluid authority and the distributed production of meaning. Based on these findings, this study proposes the concept of Participatory-Digital Hermeneutics of Uṣūl al-Dīn as a conceptual framework for understanding contemporary theological interpretation. This model highlights four key features: collaborative interpretation, fluid authority, narrative-performative rationality, and networked meaning production. While the normative foundations of ʿaqīdah remain intact, their articulation and public negotiation are increasingly shaped by digitally mediated interaction.
References
’Ulyan, Mohammad. “Digital Da’wah and Religious Authority: A Narrative Review of Islamic Preaching in the Social Media Era.” Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies 1, no. 3 (November 2023): 100–113. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v1i3.591.
Astor, Avi, Ghufran Khir-Allah, and Rosa Martínez-Cuadros. “Anonymity and Digital Islamic Authority.” Religions 15, no. 12 (December 2024): 1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121507.
Bernier, Asma. “Performing Muslim Identities through Embodiment.” The Motley Undergraduate Journal 1, no. 1 (February 2023). https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/muj.v1i1.76088.
Campbell, Heidi A., and Giulia Evolvi. “Contextualizing Current Digital Religion Research on Emerging Technologies.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, no. 1 (January 2020): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149.
Campbell, Heidi A., and Ruth Tsuria. Digital Religion Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media. New York: Routledge, 2022.
Couldry, N., and A Hepp. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London: Continuum, 2006.
Gillespie, Tarleton. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. London: Yale University Press, 2019.
Hakim, Lukman, and Zainal Mukhlis. “Otoritas Agama Di Ruang Siber: Fragmentasi Dan Kontestasi.” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 13, no. 2 (October 2023): 119–32. https://doi.org/10.15642/jik.2023.13.2.119-132.
Hanif, Abdulloh, Saifur Rahman, Masmuddin Masmuddin, Windiyani Windiyani, and Alifah Alifah. “Moralitas Diskursus Dan Otoritas Wacana Keagamaan Di Media Sosial.” Palita: Journal of Social Religion Research 8, no. 1 (April 2023): 79–96. https://doi.org/10.24256/pal.v8i1.3773.
Hansen, Hans Krause, and Mikkel Flyverbom. “The Politics of Transparency and the Calibration of Knowledge in the Digital Age.” Organization 22, no. 6 (November 2015): 872–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414522315.
Hardiman, Fransisco Budi. Public Sphere: Tracing “Democratic Participation” from Polis to Cyberspace. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2020.
Hidayat, Komaruddin. Memahami Bahasa Agama: Sebuah Kajian Hermeneutika. Jakarta: Paramadina, 2016.
Hidayatullah, Rahmat. “Otoritas Keagamaan Digital: Pembentukan Otoritas Islam Baru Di Ruang Digital.” Ushuluna: Journal Ilmu Ushuluddin 10, no. 2 (2024): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v10i02. 42831.
Jones, Stephen H. Knowledge, Tradition and Authority in Islamic Theology. Edited by Stuart Greene, Kevin Burke, and Maria McKenna. Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668376.
Latif, Alfa Taufan, and Diadji Kuntoro. “Faith in the Digital Age: The Impact of Religious Influencers on Followers’ Religious Engagement.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 5, no. 2 (2025): 396–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i2.18723.
Li, Yifei. “Research Methods for Digital Discourse Analysis Research Methods for Digital Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 21, no. 3 (May 2024): 379–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2149581.
Mahmud Yunus, Firmanda Taufiq, and Ahalla Tsauro. “Promoting Religious Moderation in New Media: Between Contestation and Claiming Religious Authority.” Edukasia Islamika 8, no. 1 (June 2023): 21–40. https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v8i1.372.
Maliki, Ibnu Akbar. “Artificial Inteligence Untuk Kemanusiaan: Pengembangan Konsep Keberagamaan Melalui Chat-GPT Sebagai Solusi Krisis Identitas Muslim Urban Di Era Digital.” Moderatio: Jurnal Moderasi Beragama 4, no. 1 (May 2024): 35–51. https://doi.org/10.32332/moderatio.v4i1.8913.
Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, 2014.
Muhtarom, Ahmad. “Pergeseran Pemikiran Kalam Tradisional Ke Kontemporer (Kajian Metodologi Kalam Klasik Ke Kalam Sosial).” Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 17, no. 1 (November 2017): 01. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v17i1.1892.
Nurhamidin, Budi, Sabil Mokodenseho, Haslinda Mokodompit, Amaludin Bahansubu, and Prasetio Rumondor. “Transformasi Otoritas Keagamaan Di Era Digital, Analisis Sosiologis Terhadap Pergeseran Pola Otoritas Ulama Di Media Sosial.” AL-MUQADDIMAH Journal of Educational and Religious Perspectives 1, no. 1 (2025): 39–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31538/cjotl.v5i2.2764.
Panigoro, Ahmad Nur Malik. “Islam Digital Dan Negosiasi Otoritas Keagamaan.” Alhamra Jurnal Studi Islam 6, no. 1 (June 2025): 71–90. https://doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v6i1.20916.
Papacharissi, Zizi. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001.
Puling, Harun. “Refleksi Teologis Tentang Integrasi Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Pendidikan Agama Kristen Di Era Algoritma.” REI MAI: Jurnal Ilmu Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen 3, no. 2 (November 2025): 181–90. https://doi.org/10.69748/jrm.v3i2.376.
Rachman, Arief, Theguh Saumantri, and Taufik Hidayatulloh. “Transformation of Religious Authority in the Digital Era: A Post-Normal Times Analysis by Ziauddin Sardar on the Phenomenon of Social Media Da’wah.” Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 45, no. 1 (2025): 107–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21580/jid.v45.1.25644.
Rohmatin, Tien, Banun Binaningrum, Bambang Irawan, Muhamad Tamamul Iman, and Firda Devi Rahmawati. “Epistemological Polemics in Digital Religion.” Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 11, no. 2 (December 2025): 437–54. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v11i2.448.
Santoso, Yudi. Hermeneutika Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora. Yogyakarta: IRCISOD, 2021.
Saumantri, Theguh. “Hegel’s Rationalism: The Dialectical Method of Approaching Metaphysical Problems.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 6, no. 3 (2023): 455–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v6i3.58381.
———. “Metafisika Empirik Dalam Pemikiran David Hume.” Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam 7, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/jaqfi.v7i2.20180.
Saumantri, Theguh, and Abdu Zikrillah. “Teori Simulacra Jean Baudrillard Dalam Dunia Komunikasi Media Massa.” ORASI: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi 11, no. 2 (2020): 247. https://doi.org/10.24235/orasi.v11i2.7177.
Schäfer, Saskia. “New Practices of Self-Representation: The Use of Online Media by Ahmadiyya and Shia Communities in Indonesia and Malaysia.” In New Media Configurations and Socio-Cultural Dynamics in Asia and the Arab World, 174–97. Nomos, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845253923-174.
Sito Rohmawati, Hanung, Zulkifli, and Nashrul Hakiem. “Mediatization and Hypermediation in Digital Religion and the Transformation of Indonesian Muslim Religious Practices through Social Media Usage.” Jurnal Sosiologi Agama 18, no. 2 (January 2025): 133–50. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsa.2024.182-01.
Wahid, Soleh Hasan. “Exploring the Intersection of Islam and Digital Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 10 (2024): 101085.
Zaid, Bouziane, Jana Fedtke, Don Donghee Shin, Abdelmalek El Kadoussi, and Mohammed Ibahrine. “Digital Islam and Muslim Millennials: How Social Media Influencers Reimagine Religious Authority and Islamic Practices.” Religions 13, no. 4 (April 2022): 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040335.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Taufik Hidayatulloh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
