PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Every manuscript submitted to Droit Islamique undergoes an initial evaluation by the editorial team to ensure its relevance to the journal’s focus and scope, as well as to identify any significant methodological concerns. Manuscripts considered suitable for further review are then assigned to at least two anonymous reviewers under a double-blind review system.

Reviewers provide constructive comments and recommendations, which are forwarded to the corresponding author for necessary revisions and responses. The revised manuscript, along with the reviewers’ reports, is then discussed in an editorial board meeting to determine the final decision. The editor subsequently communicates this decision to the corresponding author.