Starlink-Based IoT Network Performance Evaluation for Water Quality Monitoring in Remote Environments

Kasyful Amron; Dany Primanita Kartikasari; Tiara Calista Kusumawardani Atarian; Archie Vian Nizam Efendi; Rayhan Egar Sadtya Nugraha; Maritza Aliyya Devy

doi:10.15408/jti.v19i1.50142

Authors

Kasyful Amron Informatics Engineering Department, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6488-2036
Dany Primanita Kartikasari Informatics Engineering Department, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8058-9174
Tiara Calista Kusumawardani Atarian Informatics Engineering Department, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Archie Vian Nizam Efendi Informatics Engineering Department, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Rayhan Egar Sadtya Nugraha Informatics Engineering Department, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Maritza Aliyya Devy Informatics Engineering Department, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/jti.v19i1.50142

Keywords:

Satellite IoT, Water quality monitoring, ESP32, Starlink, Telemetry

Abstract

Continuous water quality monitoring in remote and infrastructure-limited regions is constrained by the lack of reliable communication networks to support real-time IoT data transmission. Starlink offers a promising alternative due to its independence from terrestrial infrastructure, yet empirical evidence on its reliability as an end-to-end IoT communication backbone remains limited. This study therefore presents the design, implementation, and empirical network performance evaluation of a Starlink-based IoT system for real-time water quality monitoring. The proposed system integrates an ESP32 microcontroller with pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), and turbidity sensors, transmitting sensor data via a Starlink satellite link to a backend platform using the MQTT protocol with AES-128-GCM application-layer encryption. Received data are processed in Node-RED, stored in InfluxDB, and visualized through a Grafana real-time dashboard. Network performance was evaluated through five independent test iterations under both TCP and UDP transmission modes, measuring latency, jitter, packet loss, and throughput as key indicators of satellite link reliability for continuous IoT data transmission. The results demonstrate stable and reliable satellite connectivity, with latency consistently within 33–36 ms, jitter below 10 ms, zero packet loss across all configurations, and UDP throughput reaching up to 32.8 Mbps. TCP throughput was constrained to approximately 3.4–4.1 Mbps due to congestion control behavior over high-latency satellite links, a finding with direct implications for transport protocol selection in satellite-based IoT deployments. These results confirm that Starlink-based connectivity provides communication quality well in excess of the demands of periodic MQTT-based sensor transmission, demonstrating its feasibility as a reliable communication backbone for IoT-based water quality monitoring in environments where terrestrial infrastructure is unavailable or unreliable.

References

[1] M. Centenaro, C. E. Costa, F. Granelli, C. Sacchi, and L. Vangelista, “A Survey on Technologies, Standards and Open Challenges in Satellite IoT,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1693–1720, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2021.3078433.

[2] W. A. Jabbar et al., “Development of LoRaWAN-based IoT system for water quality monitoring in rural areas,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 242, p. 122862, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122862.

[3] R. Bogdan, C. Paliuc, M. Crisan-Vida, S. Nimara, and D. Barmayoun, “Low-Cost Internet-of-Things Water-Quality Monitoring System for Rural Areas,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 8, p. 3919, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23083919.

[4] J. V. Abrajano, J. Nabua, J. Apanay, C. F. Pena, and K. A. Botangen, “IoT-Based Water Quality Monitoring System in Philippine Off-Grid Communities,” 9th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR), pp. 0973–0978, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icbir61386.2024.10875694.

[5] Y. Lalle, M. Fourati, L. C. Fourati, and J. P. Barraca, “Routing Strategies for LoRaWAN Multi-Hop Networks: A Survey and an SDN-Based Solution for Smart Water Grid,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 168624–168647, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3135080.

[6] M. Jia and Q. Guo, “Editorial: Intelligent Cognitive Internet of Integrated Space and Terrestrial Things,” Mobile Networks and Applications, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01406-4.

[7] I. Shayea et al., “Integration of 5G, 6G and IoT with Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Networks: Opportunity, Challenges and Future Trends,” Results in Engineering, vol. 23, pp. 102409–102409, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102409.

[8] X. Cao and X. Zhang, “SaTCP: Link-Layer Informed TCP Adaptation for Highly Dynamic LEO Satellite Networks,” IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1–10, May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/infocom53939.2023.10228914.

[9] Y. Zuo, M. Yue, H. Yang, L. Wu, and X. Yuan, “Integrating Communication, Sensing and Computing in Satellite Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 332–338, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.019.2200574.

[10] Cao, X. and Zhang, X., “SaTCP: Link-Layer Informed TCP Adaptation for Highly Dynamic LEO Satellite Networks,” IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp.1–10, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/infocom53939.2023.10228914.

[11] Michel, F., Trevisan, M. and, Giordano, D. and Bonaventure, O., “A First Look at Starlink Performance,” 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC’22), pp.130–136, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3517745.3561416.

[12] C. C. Chan, A. Al-Hourani, J. Choi, K. M. Gomez, and S. Kandeepan, “Performance Modeling Framework for IoT-over-Satellite Using Shared Radio Spectrum,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1666, May 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101666.

[13] C. C. Chan, A. Al-Hourani, J. Choi, K. M. Gomez, and S. Kandeepan, “Performance Modeling Framework for IoT-over-Satellite Using Shared Radio Spectrum,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1666, May 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101666.

[14] T. Hong, X. Yu, Z. Liu, X. Ding, and G. Zhang, “Narrowband Internet of Things via Low Earth Orbit Satellite Networks: An Efficient Coverage Enhancement Mechanism Based on Stochastic Geometry Approach,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 2004, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24062004.

[15] N. Mohan et al., “A Multifaceted Look at Starlink Performance,” Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, vol. 12, pp. 2723–2734, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3589334.3645328.

[16] E. Hidayana, E. Setiawan, and A. I. Juniani, “Classification of water quality based on dissolved solids and turbidity parameters with the utilization of total dissolved solids sensor and turbidity sensor,” Journal of Soft Computing Exploration, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 231–239, Jul. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.52465/joscex.v5i3.376.

[17] R. Reddy, N. Salomi K, B. Sai, S. Pushpa, and E. Raju, “Analysis of Water Quality Parameters Across Diverse Sources,” Journal of Pharma Insights and Research., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 210–216, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.69613/3jxm7e23.