METODE PEMAHAMAN HADIS (KAJIAN PERDEBATAN HADIS TENTANG MAYIT DISIKSA KARENA TANGISAN  KELUARGA)

Amrin Amrin; Miftahul Huda

METODE PEMAHAMAN HADIS (KAJIAN PERDEBATAN HADIS TENTANG MAYIT DISIKSA KARENA TANGISAN KELUARGA)

Amrin Amrin, Miftahul Huda

Abstract

This research departs from the problem regarding the debate of the scholars about the hadith of the tortured deceased because of the cries of his family, whether it is Saheeh or dhaif. The authors conclude that the results of the scholars’ understanding of the hadith vary: those who based on textual (text), and the other hand, those who understand the hadith with the asbab al-wurūd hadith, the situation, and conditions as well as the purpose, ensuring the meaning of the word in the hadith. With this understanding, there is a difference in opinion of the scholars regarding the hadith about the deceased being tortured because of the crying of the family. Differences occur because of using different approaches, methodologies, and ijtihad. So that some say that the hadith is authentic and some scholars say dhaif on the basis of their respective evidence. Hujjah in the form of narrators, eyes, and an understanding of the hadith eyes and asbabul wurud. The method used by the scholars in arguing about the hadith is by using the textual method, observance of the hadith, and asbab al-wurūd. So that the scholars used an approach to unifying differences with three approaches, namely the al-jam'u, takhyir, and tarjih methods.

Keywords

Hadith; Corpses, Methods, Debate

References

Abdul Mustaqin. Ilmu Ma’anil Hadits. Yogyakarta: ; Idea Press Yogyakarta, 2016.

Abu al-Fadl Ahmad bin ‘Ali bin Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Hajaral Asqalani. Fathal Bari Syarh Sahihal Bukharriy, Juz 4, n.d.

Abu Muhahamma’ ‘Abdullag bin Muslim bin Qutaybahal Dinuri. Ta’wil Mukhtalifah Hadit. Al-Maktab al- Islam Mu’asasahal ‘Ishraq, 1999.

Ahmad bin Abd Al-Rahman bin Muhammad Al-Bana Al-Sa’ani. Al-Fath Al-Rabbani Li-Tartib Musnad Al-Iman Ahmad Bin Hambal Al- ShaybanI Wa Ma’ahu Buluhg Al-Amani Min Asrar Al Fath Al-Rabani,Juz 7. Kairo: DarIhya Al-Turat Al-Arabi, n.d.

Al-Ghazali, Syaikh Muhammad. Studi Kritik Atas Hadis Nabi Saw Antara Pemahaman Tesktual Dan Kontekstual (Terj. Muhammad Al-Baqir). Bandung: Mizan, 1998.

Al-Muzahiri, Muhammad Thanaullah. Al- Tafsir Al Muzahirl. Pakistan. Maktabah Al Rushdiyah, n.d.

Al-Siba’i, Mustafa. Al Sunnah Wa Makanatuba Fi Al Tashri Al Islam. Beirut: al Maktabah al Islamiyah, 2000.

Ali Yasmanta, and Siti Rohmaturrosyidah Ratnawati. “Studi Kritik Matan Hadis : Kajian Teoritis Dan Aplikatif Untuk Menguji Keshahihan Matan Hadis.” Al-Bukhari Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 2, no. 2 (2019).

Anas, Mohamad. “Metode Memahami Hadis-Hadis Kontradiktif.” Mutawatir 3, no. 1 (2015): 123. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2013.3.1.123-139.

Anggoro, Taufan. “Perkembangan Pemahaman Hadis Di Indonesia: Analisis Pergeseran Dan Tawaran Di Masa Kini.” Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Al-Hadis 7, no. 01 (2019): 147. https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v7i01.4533.

Asriady, Muhammad. “Metode Pemahaman Hadis.” Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan 16, no. 1 (2019): 314. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v16i1.94.

Burhanuddin. “Metode Pemahaman Hadis.” Jurnal Al-Mubarak 3, no. 20 (2018): 1–11.

Firdaus, Muhammad Taufiq, and Muhammad Alfatih Suryadilaga. “Integrasi Keilmuan Dalam Kritik Matan Hadis.” Tajdid: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 18, no. 2 (2020): 153–76. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v18i2.96.

Hariono, Duwi. “Syarah Hadis: Model Dan Aplikasi Metodologis.” Universum 13, no. 2 (2019): 137–50.

Huda, Nailil, and Ade Pahrudin. “Orientasi Kajian Hadis Kontemporer Indonesia (Studi Artikel E-Jurnal Dalam Portal Moraref 2015-2017).” Refleksi 17, no. 2 (2018): 169–92. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v17i2.10204.

Idris, Muhammad, and Taufiqurrahaman Nur Siagian. “Metode Pemahaman Hadis Ulama Kontemporer Non-Ahli Hadis (Studi Komparatif Antara Persepsi Muhammad Al-Ghazali Dan Pendapat Yusuf Al-Qardhawi).” ISLAM TRANSFORMATIF : Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 2 (2018): 155. https://doi.org/10.30983/it.v2i2.754.

Khairuddin. “Metode Penyelesaian Hadist Mukhtalif (Kajian Ta’arudh Al-Adillah).” (Kajian Ta’arudh Al-Adillah), 2010, 48–58.

Komarudin. “Tinjauan Mukhtalaf AL-Hadits Terhadap Hadist-Hadits Menangis Mayit.” Kordinat XVI, no. 1 (2017): 47–62.

Mazid, Ali Abd Al Basit. Manhaj Al Muhadithunfial Qarnal Awwal Al-Hijriwa Hatta Isrinaal Hadhir. Kairo: Al Hayah al Misriyyah al Ammah lil kitab, n.d.

Muhammad bin Ali bin Adam Musa’al Ityubial Walallawi. Sharh Sunan Al Nasa’iy Al Musamma Dhakhirat Al Uqbafi Syarh Al Mujtabi, Juz 18. Daral Burumlinnashrwaal Tawzi, 2003.

Muhammad bin Isma’il al-Amiri al-Kahlani al-Shon’ani. Subulus Salam Juz 2, n.d.

Muhammad Nurudin. Qawaid Syarh Hadits. Kudus: Nora Media Enterprise, 2014.

Nafisah, Lailiyatun. “Urgensi Pemahaman Hadis Kontekstual.” Universum 13 No. 1 J (2019): 1–26.

Nurdin, Subhan. Benarkan Isa Dan Dajjah Akan Turun. Jakarta: Qultum Media, 2016.

Sa’dudin, Ihsan, and Muhammad Nasrun Siregar. “Reinterpretasi Hadis Mayat Diazab Atas Tangisan Keluarganya Dengan Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur.” Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi Islam 19, no. 1 (2018): 142. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v19i1.4837.

Shobron, Amrin, and Muthoifin Rosyadi, Imron. “Islamic Education Values in the Tradition of Peta Kapanca of Mbojo Community Tribe in West Nusa Tenggara Department of Islamic Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Indonesia Mut122@ums.Ac.Id” 29, no. 5 (2020): 6802–12.

Umi Sumbulan. Kritik Hadis; Pendekatan Historis Metodologi. Malang: UIN Malang Press, 2008.

Umma Farida. Naqd Al-Hadits. Kudus: STAIN Kudus, 2009.

Zulkifli, Rakhmawati. “Moderasi Pemahaman Hadis Dalam Hukum Islam Menurut Al-Qaradhawi.” El-Buhuth: Borneo Journal of Islamic Studies 1, no. 1 (2018): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.21093/el-buhuth.v1i1.1318.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/ushuluna.v7i1.20548