Direct Cash Transfer Effect on Children Quality in Women’s Household in Indonesia

Ni Putu Wiwin Setyari, Putu Ayu Pramitha Purwanti

Abstract


Many studies confirm the importance of the role of women in the effectiveness of government programs, especially the programs aimed at improving family welfare. This study aims to examine the effect of the government program of direct cash transfers (BLT) on the human capital of children in households headed by women in Indonesia. Data for the study was obtained from IFLS (wave 5) and analyzed with multiple linear regression. The analysis results show that there is a negative effect of BLT on the education of children. Previous studies state this is due to the changing behavior of the recipient households or the spillover effects on the non-recipient households. This research proposes a different reason, such as social discrimination against households headed by women. The solid patriarchal culture in Indonesia often ignores female-headed households, so the number of households receiving social protection programs is relatively very limited.

How to Cite:
Setyari, N. P. W., & Purwanti, P. A. P (2022). Direct Cash Transfer on Children Quality in Women’s Household in Indonesia. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 11(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v11i1.22769.


Keywords


cash transfer policy; the human capital of children; gender; household welfare

References


Aleed, Y. (2016). Effects of Education in Developing Countries. (Unpublished Thesis). University of Manitoba.

Beegle, K., Frankenberg, E., & Thomas, D. (2001). Bargaining Power within Couples and Use of Prenatal and Delivery Care in Indonesia. Studies in Family Planning, 32(2), 130–146.

Doss, C. (2006). The Effects of Intrahousehold Property Ownership on Expenditure Patterns in Ghana. Journal of African Economies, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/eji025.

Doss, C. (2013). Intrahousehold Bargaining and Resource Allocation in Developing Countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 28(1), 52–78.

Engida, Y. M. (2021). The Three Dimensional Role of Education for Women Empowerment. Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2021.32.38.

Fernald, L. C., Gertler, P. J., & Neufeld, L. M. (2008). Role of Cash in Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes for Child Health, Growth, and Development: An Analysis of Mexico’s Oportunidades. The Lancet, 371(9615). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60382-7.

Fuwa, N., Ito, S., Kubo, K., Kurosaki, T., & Sawada, Y. (2006). Introduction to a Study of Intrahousehold Resource Allocation and Gender Discrimination in Rural Andhra Pradesh, India. The Developing Economies, 44(4), 375-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2006.00022.x

Hanna, R., Kennedy, H., Olken, B. A., Prima, A., & Satriawan, E. (2018). Cumulative Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Experimental Evidence from Indonesia. www.tnp2k.go.id

Hastuti., Toyaman, N., Usman, S., Sulaksono, B., Budiyati, S., Widyanti, W. D., Rosfadhila, M., Sadaly, H., Erlita, S., Sodo, R. J., Bazzi, S., & Sumarto, S. (2006). Kajian Cepat Pelaksanaan Subsidi Langsung Tunai Tahun 2005 di Indonesia: Studi Kasus di Lima Kabupaten/Kota. SMERU. Jakarta.

Hazarika, G., & Sarangi, S. (2008). Household Access to Microcredit and Child Work in Rural Malawi. World Development, 36(5), 843-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.008.

Indonesia Ministry of National Development Planning and the United Nations Children’s Fund. (2019). Achieving the SDGs for Children in Indonesia: Emerging Findings for Reaching The Targets. Bappenas. Jakarta.

Islam, A., & Choe, C. (2013). Child Labor and Schooling Responses to Access to Microcredit in Rural Bangladesh. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00400.x.

Izzati, R. A., Suryadarma, D., & Suryahadi, A. (2020). The Behavioral Effects of Unconditional Cash Transfers: Evidence from Indonesia. SMERU. Jakarta.

Johnson, N. L., Kovarik, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Njuki, J., & Quisumbing, A. (2016). Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development: Lessons from Eight Projects. World Development, 83, 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.009.

Kandpal, E. (2019). In Fighting Poverty, Cash Transfer Programs Should Be Wary of Negative Spillovers. The World Bank. Washington DC.

Meydianawathi, L. G., & Setyari, N. P. W. (2018). Effectiveness of Household-Based Poverty Programs: Lesson Learn from Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 19(2), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v19i2.5230.

Nazara, S., & Rahayu, S. K. (2013). Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH): Indonesian Conditional Cash Transfer Programme. Policy Research Brief 42. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.

OECD. (2019). Social Protection System Review of Indonesia. OECD. Paris.

Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Returns to Investment in Education: a Decennial Review of The Global Literature. Policy Research Working Paper No. 8402. World Bank. Washington DC.

Quisumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2003). Resources at Marriage and Intrahousehold Allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 283-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00052.

Setyari, N. P. W. (2013). Distribusi aAokasi Sumber Daya Dalam Rumah Tangga di Indonesia: Anak Sekolah atau Bekerja? Piramida , IX(2), 59–71.

Setyari, N. P. W., Widanta, A. A. B. P., & Purbadharmaja, I. B. P. (2018). Women’s Control Over Economic Resources Effect to Family Welfare. JEJAK, 11(2), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v11i2.16051.

Sulaiman, M. (2012). Social Protection and Human Capital Accumulation in Developing Countries. (Unpublished Thesis). The London School of Economics and Political Sciences.

Yubilianto. (2020). Return to Education and Financial Value of Investment in Higher Education in Indonesia. Journal of Economic Structures, 9, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-020-00193-6.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/sjie.v11i1.22769

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.