The Relations of Politics, Law, and Economics in a Social Philosophy Perspective
Abstract
The relationship between politics, law, and economics forms the main foundation in the dynamics of national and social life. These three elements not only influence each other structurally but also create a power structure that directly affects the distribution of social justice, policy-making, and the functioning of state institutions. This study aims to examine in depth how the relationship between politics, law, and economics is formed, implemented, and questioned through a social philosophy approach, and how this approach can open up space for criticism of the structural inequalities that occur. The research method used is qualitative with an interdisciplinary approach that combines political, legal, and economic analysis within a social philosophy framework. Data were obtained through a literature review of critical philosophy, social justice theory, and relevant empirical studies. The analysis was carried out reflectively and thematically on concepts such as power, justice, law as an ideological instrument, and political economy in the context of the state. The results of the study reveal that the relationship between politics, law, and economics is often constructed to maintain the dominance of certain groups, rather than achieving social justice. Law is not always neutral, but usually becomes a tool for legitimising economic and political power. Politics also does not always run within the framework of democratic participation, but is often controlled by market interests. Social philosophy plays a crucial role in dismantling these power structures and providing ethical and critical perspectives to promote policy reform and social stability.
Keywords: Social philosophy; political law economy; social justice; power; public policyFull Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, A. (2016). The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Columbia University Press.
Ardiansyah, M. (2020). Legislasi dan Oligarki Ekonomi: Studi Kritis atas Proses Legislasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(1), 1-15.
Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Hart Publishing.
Benhabib, S. (2002). The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton University Press.
Berlin, I. (1969). Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1987). The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal, 38(5), 805–853.
Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Polity Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. Pantheon.
Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World. New Left Review, 36, 69–88.
Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Columbia University Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press.
Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford University Press.
Hadiz, V. R. (2017). “Indonesia’s Oligarchic Democracy: The Limits of Reform.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(1), 67–83.
Hadiz, V. R. (2017). Indonesia’s New Regressive Elite and the Illiberal Turn. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1239752
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Heywood, A. (2013). Politics (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Honneth, A. (1996). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. MIT Press.
Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Columbia University Press.
Hunt, A. (1990). Rights and Social Theory. Longman.
Jessop, B. (2008). State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Polity Press.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German Ideology. International Publishers.
Mulyani, S. (2021). "Kontroversi UU Cipta Kerja dan Tantangan Demokrasi Konstitusional." Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(2), 321–340.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.
Pistor, K. (2019). The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality. Princeton University Press.
Plato. (2007). The Republic (trans. D. Lee). Penguin Classics.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Supiot, A. (2017). Governance by Numbers: The Making of a Legal Model of Allegiance. Hart Publishing.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2006). Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press.
Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.
Zurn, C. F. (2011). Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders. In B. van den Brink & D. Owen (Eds.), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory (pp. 345–371). Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v12i1.45728
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.