CARING TOGETHER: GRASSROOTS CHILDCARE, URBAN INCLUSION, AND COLLECTIVE RESILIENCE

Saifudin Asrori, Muhammad Ismai’il, Ahmad Shabbir

Abstract


Abstract. As urbanization accelerates in Indonesia, access to affordable, inclusive, and culturally relevant childcare remains a persistent challenge for urban families, particularly among working-class and marginalized communities. This study investigates Rumah Anak, a community-led childcare initiative in an urban neighborhood of Indonesia, to understand how grassroots caregiving models foster social cohesion, reciprocal care, and resilience amidst institutional fragmentation and resource scarcity. Using a qualitative case study approach that includes semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and document analysis, the research identifies three interrelated dynamics: trust-building and social bonding, reciprocal caregiving as a local ethic, and grassroots navigation of institutional ambiguity. The findings illustrate that Rumah Anak functions not merely as a substitute for formal daycare, but as a form of relational social infrastructure that strengthens community ties, supports maternal employment, and enhances child development. The study concludes that community-based childcare systems, when adequately supported, hold transformative potential for inclusive urban development and call for policy frameworks that center care as a shared civic responsibility.

 

Abstrak. Di tengah percepatan urbanisasi di Indonesia, akses terhadap layanan pengasuhan anak yang terjangkau, inklusif, dan sesuai dengan konteks budaya masih menjadi tantangan besar, terutama bagi keluarga kelas pekerja dan kelompok marjinal. Penelitian ini mengkaji Rumah Anak, sebuah inisiatif pengasuhan anak berbasis komunitas di kawasan urban Indonesia, untuk memahami bagaimana model pengasuhan akar rumput mampu membangun kohesi sosial, praktik perawatan timbal balik, dan ketahanan kolektif di tengah fragmentasi kelembagaan dan keterbatasan sumber daya. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus kualitatif melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi partisipan, dan analisis dokumen, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi tiga dinamika utama: pembangunan kepercayaan dan ikatan sosial, etika lokal dalam perawatan timbal balik, serta adaptasi komunitas terhadap ambiguitas institusional. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa Rumah Anak bukan sekadar alternatif dari daycare formal, melainkan berfungsi sebagai infrastruktur sosial relasional yang memperkuat jaringan komunitas, mendukung partisipasi kerja perempuan, dan meningkatkan perkembangan anak. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa sistem pengasuhan berbasis komunitas, jika didukung secara memadai, memiliki potensi transformatif dalam pembangunan kota yang inklusif dan menuntut kerangka kebijakan yang menempatkan perawatan sebagai tanggung jawab sipil Bersama.

 


Keywords


community-based childcare; reciprocal care; urban inclusion; social infrastructure; grassroots resilience; pengasuhan anak berbasis komunitas; pengasuhan timbal balik; inklusi perkotaan; infrastruktur sosial; ketahanan masyarakat

References


Auliya, F., Pranoto, Y. K. S., Sunawan, S., & Sunarso, A. (2021). The Permissive Non-Parental Childcare and Moral Intelligence: Indonesian Setting. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (Ijere), 10(2), 569. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21032

Behbehani, F., Kowalski, A., Selam, H., Dombrowski, E., & Black, M. M. (2024). Childcare Centre Attendance and Health, Growth, and Development Among Children Aged 0–3 Years in Low- And Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Journal of Global Health, 14. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04028

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Busłowska, A., & Marcinkiewicz, J. (2023). Social Cohesion of Functional Urban Areas (Example of Eastern Poland). Social Indicators Research, 167(1–3), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03119-4

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.

Halim, D., Johnson, H. C., Perova, E., Oloo, L., Elsey, H., Abboah‐Offei, M., Kiyeng, M., Amboka, P., Okelo, K., Kitsao-Wekulo, P., Kimani‐Murage, E., Langat, N., Nampijja, M., Li, M., Laughlin, C., Setyonaluri, D., Utomo, A., Li, L., Li, J., … Firmansyah, G. (2023). Negotiating Work, Family, and Traffic: Articulations of Married Women’s Employment Decisions in Greater Jakarta. Gender Work and Organization, 31(6), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454537

Hunter, L. J., Bayly, B. L., Bierman, K. L., Welsh, J. A., & Gest, J. M. (2022). Predicting School Readiness Program Implementation in Community-Based Childcare Centers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023505

Indarwati, F., Firmansyah, G., Li, L., & Li, J. (2022). Division of Childcare Policy Actors Under Health-Oriented Goals: Thematic Analysis of China’s Policy Texts From the Social Constructionist Perspective. Bali Medical Journal, 10(3), 1192–1198. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v10i3.2881

Jegathesan, T., Yousafzai, A. K., Mantel, M., Sereni, V., Armstrong, R. W., & Minhas, R. (2023). Informal Settlements and the Care of Children 0–3 years of Age: A Qualitative Study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1110578

Kumalasari, D., & Alhasyimi, A. L. A. (2023). Social Childcare Concept: Social Community as a Childcare Partner for Working Parents. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 11(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v11i1.15523

Lansing, A. E., Romero, N. J., Siantz, E., Silva, V., Center, K., Casteel, D., & Gilmer, T. (2023). Building Trust: Leadership Reflections on Community Empowerment and Engagement in a Large Urban Initiative. BMC Public Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15860-z

Li, L., & Li, J. (2024). Division of Childcare Policy Actors Under Health-Oriented Goals: Thematic Analysis of China’s Policy Texts From the Social Constructionist Perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454537

Limaki, A. K. (2024). The Potential of Community-Led Development Initiatives for Addressing Urban Inequality: Strategies and Challenges of Successful Models in Practice. International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 4(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.51483/ijarp.4.1.2024.13-24

O’Brien, C., Leavens, L., Ndiaye, C., & Traoré, D. (2022). Women’s Empowerment, Income, and Nutrition in a Food Processing Value Chain Development Project in Touba, Senegal. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159526

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544.

Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/harkat.v21i1.46977

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Saifudin Asrori, Muhammad Ismai’il, Ahmad Shabbir

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.