The Dilemma of Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes in the Religious Courts
Abstract
This article analyzes the difficulties in resolving Sharia economic disputes in the Religious Courts and offers suggestions for improving the efficacy of these dispute resolutions. This study identified many obstacles, such as the limited knowledge and comprehension of religious judges regarding Sharia economic law, the Complexity of disputes and difficult-to-understand evidence, and the slow settlement process and high costs. Through analysis and a review of the relevant literature, this article offers several suggestions for overcoming these obstacles. The first recommendation is to increase religious judges' comprehension of sharia economic law through intensive training and education programs. The second recommendation is to enhance cooperation between Religious Courts and Islamic financial institutions to make dispute resolution more effective. To improve the quality of dispute resolution, the third recommendation is the development of education and training programs for mediators and arbitrators. Utilizing technology in the dispute resolution process to improve efficiency and accessibility is the final recommendation. This article has significant implications for the Religious Courts' Sharia economic dispute resolution system. By implementing the proposed guidance, the resolution of Sharia financial disputes is anticipated to become more efficient, equitable, and consistent with the principles of sharia economic law.
Abstrak: Artikel ini menganalisis kesulitan yang terlibat dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama dan menawarkan saran untuk meningkatkan efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa tersebut. Studi ini mengidentifikasi sejumlah kendala, seperti keterbatasan pengetahuan dan pemahaman hakim agama tentang hukum ekonomi syariah, kompleksitas sengketa dan bukti yang sulit dipahami, serta proses penyelesaian yang lamban dan biaya yang tinggi. Melalui analisis dan kajian literatur yang relevan, artikel ini menawarkan beberapa saran untuk mengatasi kendala tersebut. Rekomendasi pertama adalah meningkatkan pemahaman hakim agama terhadap hukum ekonomi syariah melalui program pelatihan dan pendidikan yang intensif. Rekomendasi kedua adalah meningkatkan kerjasama antara Pengadilan Agama dan lembaga keuangan syariah agar penyelesaian sengketa lebih efektif. Untuk meningkatkan kualitas penyelesaian sengketa, rekomendasi ketiga adalah pengembangan program pendidikan dan pelatihan mediator dan arbiter. Memanfaatkan teknologi dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa untuk meningkatkan efisiensi dan aksesibilitas merupakan rekomendasi akhir. Pasal ini berimplikasi signifikan terhadap sistem penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Dengan melaksanakan rekomendasi yang diajukan, diharapkan penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah menjadi lebih efisien, berkeadilan, dan sejalan dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum ekonomi syariah.
Kata kunci: Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah; Pengadilan Agama; Penyelesaian Sengketa.
References
Abduh, M., & Omar, M. A. (2018). Islamic Banking Education: Insights from Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(4), 464-481.
Abdul Rahman, A. S., & Haron, H. (2019). Enhancing the Dispute Resolution Mechanism of Islamic Banking: A Comparative Study of the Civil Law and Common Law Systems. Arab Law Quarterly, 33(4), 319-341.
Abdulhadi, A. (2020). Interpretation and Application of Islamic Law in Arab Societies: Challenges and Prospects. Arab Law Quarterly, 34(2), 135-158.
Alarief, M. R. (2018). Court Mediation of Civil Disputes: A Comparative Study between Indonesian and Saudi Arabian Legal Systems. Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law, 14(1), 65-95.
Alhabshi, S. O., & Veillette, C. (2021). Legal Foundations of Islamic Finance: An Introduction. In Islamic Finance: The Globalization of Shari'a (pp. 31-48). Springer.
Al-Madny, A. (2018). Arbitrability of Islamic Finance Disputes in Indonesia: A Comparative Study. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 3(1), 35-57.
Alzeban, A., Zainol, Z., & Rashid, A. (2019). Litigation Risk and Performance of Islamic Banks: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(4), 1043-1066.
Bhabra, G. S. (2021). Legal and Institutional Aspects of Arbitration in Islamic Finance. In Islamic Finance: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 107-126). Springer.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Elzarka, A. S. (2018). Corporate Governance Mechanisms, Board Characteristics, and Voluntary Disclosure in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 749-768.
El-Zoghbi, M. B., & Tarazi, N. (2020). Islamic Banking and Financial Inclusion: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(9), 2022-2046.
Fauzan, M. A., & Asyhari, A. (2020). Penggunaan Metode Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 17(2), 255-280.
Ghazali, S. A., & Rosli, M. M. (2020). Online Dispute Resolution for Islamic Finance Disputes in Malaysia: An Overview. Journal of Islamic Finance, 9(2
Ghouri, A. M. (2017). Islamic Arbitration: A Path to Solve Disputes in Islamic Finance. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 5(2), 29-34.
Hasan, M. K. (2020). Legal Education and Research in Islamic Law in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 62(3), 283-301.
Hassan, A., Faisal, F., & Mohamad, S. (2019). Islamic Finance: The Role of Intellectual Capital and Innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(5), 552-575.
Mansur, H. (2020). Metode Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Agama dan Peluang Akses Keadilan Bagi Masyarakat Ekonomi Lemah. Al-Ma'rifah, 17(1), 69-92.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Ramli, N. A., & Ismail, N. H. (2019). The Roles and Challenges of Islamic Financial Institutions in Promoting the Halal Concept in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(2), 321-341.
Rizqiyah, N., & Dewi, R. K. (2019). The Development of Islamic Banking Arbitration Institution in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(4), 432-444.
Saad, N. (2016). Consumer Protection in Islamic Banking Products: A Comparative Analysis between Malaysia and Saudi Arabia. Arab Law Quarterly, 30(1), 50-81.
Saleem, S., Raza, S. A., & Haroon, O. (2020). Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Disclosure of Islamic Banking Information: A Mediating Role of Ethical Leadership. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(3), 532-554.
Salim, M. (2017). The Indonesian Court Administration System in the Reform Era. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 12(1), 121-140.
Salmi, A. M. (2020). Enhancing the Efficiency of Shari'a Courts through Technology: A Case Study of Malaysia. Arab Law Quarterly, 34(1), 50-74.
Elzarka, A. S. (2018). Corporate Governance Mechanisms, Board Characteristics, and Voluntary Disclosure in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 749-768.
Sihombing, H. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law Studies, 2(1), 29-44.
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.
Yusriadi, I. (2020). The Role of the Shariah Economic Law Expertise in Formulating Justice. Al-Mudarris: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 2(2), 133-152.
Zain, M. (2019). Challenges of Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence in the Economic Context: An Analytical Study. Journal of Islam in Asia, 16(3), 300-320.
DOI: 10.15408/mimbar.v39i2.33336
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
