Model Pengembangan Kurikulum “Model Beauchamp, Roger dan Douglas Brown”

luqi fauziyah, Umi Hanifah

Abstract


This research discusses three curriculum development models, namely the Beauchamp Model, Roger Model, and Douglas Brown Model. The Beauchamp Model emphasizes a systematic and administrative approach in curriculum development, the Roger Model focuses on interpersonal interactions and direct experiences in learning, while the Douglas Brown Model prioritizes cognitive, socio-affective and linguistic principles in language teaching. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method with a literature study approach. Data was collected from various academic sources, such as books, scientific journals, and educational documents related to curriculum development. The analysis was carried out through a comparative study of the three models to identify their strengths, weaknesses and relevance in the educational context in Indonesia. The research results show that each model has its own unique approach to curriculum development. The Beauchamp Model is more suitable for a structured and centralized education system, the Roger Model is suitable for an experience-based approach and active participation of students, while the Douglas Brown Model is more effective in language learning. By understanding these various models, educational institutions can select and adapt the most relevant models according to their learning needs.

Keywords


Curriculum Development Model; Beauchamp; Roger; Douglas Brown; Qualitative Method.

References


Izdiyan Muttaqin M. Stagnansi Pengembangan Kurikulum Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Di Indonesia: Ide-Ide Untuk Memecahkannya Stagnancy of Arabic Lesson Curriculum Development in Indonesia: an Idea To Solve It. 2009;543–55.

Hamdi MM. Evaluasi Kurikulum Pendidikan. J Tawadhu. 2016;15(2):1–23.

Yusuf M. Desain Pengembangan Kurikulum Bahasa Arab: Pendekatan Otak Kanan. El-Tsaqafah J Jur PBA. 2019;18(2):147–60.

Tur’aeni E. Desain Pengembanga Kurikulum Bahasa Arab: Pendekatan Potensi Fitrah. Al-Ibtikar. 2019;8:23–37.

Weaver T. Grass roots. Engineering. 2009;250(2):44–7.

Shepherd M, Joyce E, Williams B, Graham S, Li W, Booth J, et al. Training for tomorrow: Establishing a worldwide curriculum in online adaptive radiation therapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2025;33(December 2024):100304. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100304

Suratno J, Sari DP, Bani A. Kurikulum dan Model-model Pengembangannya. J Pendidik Guru Mat. 2022;2(1):67–75.

Sabilun N. Pengem-bangan Kurikulum. Cetakan Ke-1 Bandung PT Refika Aditama. 2017;22.

Tamaji ST, Umroh IL. Konsep Pengembangan Kurikulum Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Al-Fakkaar. 2022;3(1):97–115.

Husin A, Helmi H, Nengsih YK, Rendana M. Environmental education in schools: sustainability and hope. Discov Sustain [Internet]. 2025;6(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00837-2

Wahyuni S, Agustina, Juita N. Model - Model Pengembangan Kurikulum Bahasa di Sekolah. J Educ. 2024;06(02):11485–503.

Hasanah M, Mubaligh A, Sari RR, Syarofah A, Prasetyo A. Arabic Performance Curricullum Development: Reconstruction Based on Actfl and Douglas Brown Perspective. Ijaz Arab J Arab Learn. 2021;4(3):779–801.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/kordinat.v24i2.45177

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.