Measuring the Intention for Innovative Work Behavior: Scale Development for Indonesian Employees

Arum Etikariena, Aflaha Hadini Kusuma, Anak Agung Istri Ratna Kumala Dewi, Devika Nur Shabrina, Rana Hafizhah, Zidan Raleto Seno

Abstract


The current business era is dynamic and filled with uncertainty, and innovating is no longer an option but a solution to survive and compete. Innovation in the organisational context, carried out by employees in their work, is known as Innovative Work Behaviour (IWB). However, the measurement tool for innovative work behaviour focuses on past behaviour, whereas innovative behaviour is characterised by uncertainty. Previous behaviour may not necessarily predict future behaviour. Meanwhile, intention is the closest factor to predicting future behaviour. Some researchers have adjusted the measurement of innovative work behaviour into the intention for innovative work behaviour. But its reliability and validity have not been tested, and it has not been adapted to the Indonesian language. Therefore, this quantitative study aims to develop a measurement tool of intention for innovative work behaviour in Indonesia based on the Su et al. Scale (2019). Using the convenience sampling method, 1,071 participants who had worked for at least 1 (one) year in their organisation participated in this study. The results show that the I-IWB Scales had good reliability (α = 0.84). Confirmatory factor analysis also revealed that the scale fit the one-factor model (RMSEA = 0.05 < 0.07), CFI (CFI = 0.97 > 0.95), TLI = 0.955 > 0.90). Construct validity shows the model fit as a unidimensional scale. Thus, based on the analysis results, it can be said that the I-IWB Scale is still reliable and valid for measuring the construct of intention for innovative work behaviour for Indonesian employees.


Keywords


construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis, intention innovative work behavior, reliability

References


Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

AlEssa, H. S., & Durugbo, C. M. (2021). Systematic review of Innovative Work Behaviour Concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly, 72(4), 1171–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00224-x

Alatli, B. (2020). A Systematic review of research articles on measurement invariance in education and psychology. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2020, 7(4), 607–630. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.738560

Andrade, C. (2020). Sample Size and its Importance in Research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(1), 102–103. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_504_19

Banholzer, M., Birshan, M., Doherty, R., & LaBerge, L. (2023). Innovation: Your solution for weathering uncertainty. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/innovation-your-solution-for-weathering-uncertainty

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and Innovative Work Behaviour: A Systematic Literature Review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228-1253. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257.

Boyles, M. (2022). Innovation in Business: What it is & Why it’s so Important. Harvard Business School Online. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/importance-of-innovation- in-business

Brunner, M., & Süß, H.-M. (2005). “Analysing the Reliability of Multidimensional Measures: An Example from Intelligence Research”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), pp. 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404268669

Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods. 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

https://doi.org/10.1093/hebz/9780198869443.003.0012

Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for The Behavioural Sciences. Routledge Academic. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Dewi, A.N & Widhiar, W. (2010). Keberfungsian butir diferensial dalam pengukuran dukungan sosial. Public Release. Fakultas Psikologi UGM.

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075704

Etikariena, A., & Muluk, H. (2014). Correlation between organisational memory and innovative work behaviour. Hubs-Asia, 18(2): 77-88. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3463

Etikariena, A. (2018). Perbedaan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Berdasarkan Karakteristik Individu Karyawan. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.17.2.107-118

Golzar, J; Noor, S & Tajik, O. (2022). Convenience Sampling. Sampling Method | Descriptive Research. International Journal of Education and Language Study. https://www.ijels.net/article_162981_06fc448b8914d42316b8d44829c88188.pdf

GonzaÂlez-Blanch C, Medrano LA, Muñoz-Navarro R, RuõÂz-RodrõÂguez P, Moriana JA, Limonero JT. (2018) Factor structure and measurement invariance across various demographic groups and over time for the PHQ-9 in primary care patients in Spain. PLoS ONE 13(2):e0193356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193356

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202

Hooper, D., & Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. In The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60, 2008.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038

Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organisations. Knowledge Management and Organisational Design, 93–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-9749- 1.50010-7

Kaplan, R.M & Saccuzo, D.P. (2005). Psychological Testing, Principles, Applications. And Issues. (6th ed.). Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39229-0_57

Lu, C.C., & Luh, D.-B. (2013). Innovative Behavioural Intention and Creativity Achievement in Design: Test of an Integrated Model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39229-0_57

Luksyte, A; Unsworth, K.L & Avery, D.R.(2018). Innovative work behaviour and sex-based stereotypes: Examining sex differences in perceptions and evaluations of innovative work behaviour. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. Vol.39 (3). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2219

Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, 17, 59-82. https://doi.org/10.26458/1746

Muchiri, M. K., McMurray, A. J., Nkhoma, M., & Pham, H. C. (2020). Mapping antecedents of Innovative work behaviour: A conceptual review. The Journal of Developing Areas, 54(4). https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2020.0047

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to Use a monte carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599-620.

https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8

Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behaviour predicts future behaviour. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54

Parker, RB; Parker, PD; Larkin, T & Cockburn, J. (2016). A psychometric evaluation of the gender bias in medical education scale. BMC Medical Education. (2016) 16:251. https://10.1186/s12909-016-0774-2

Putnik, DL & Bornstein, M.H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev. 2016 September ; 41: 71–90. https://10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

Salvador, F., & Sting, F.J. (2022). How your company can encourage innovation from all employees. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/09/how-your-company-can-encourage-innovation-from-all-employees

Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701

Scott, N. W., Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., Gundy, C., Koller, M., Petersen, M. A., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2010). Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8(81). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-81

Srirahayu, D. P., Ekowati, D., & Sridadi, A. R. (2023). Innovative work behaviour in public organisations: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13557

Su W, Lin X & Ding H (2019) The Influence of Supervisor Developmental Feedback on Employee Innovative Behaviour: A Moderated Mediation Model. Front. Psychol. 10:1581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01581

Tsaousis, I, Sideridis, G.D & AlGhamdi, H.M (2020) Measurement invariance and differential item functioning across gender within a latent class analysis framework: Evidence from a high-stakes test for university admission in saudi arabia. Frontier Psychology. 11:622. https://10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00622

Umar, J & Nisa, Y.F (2020). Uji validitas konstruk dan pelaporannya. JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(2), 2020, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.XXXXX

Van De Schoot R, Schmidt P, De Beuckelaer A, Lek K and Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M (2015) Editorial: Measurement Invariance. Front. Psychol. 6:1064. https://10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01064

Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 8(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.8.3.93


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v14i1.38023

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Arum Etikariena, Aflaha Hadini Kusuma, Anak Agung Istri Ratna Kumala Dewi, Devika Nur Shabrina, Rana Hafizhah, Zidan Raleto Seno

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.