1. Home
  2. Vol 10, No 2 (2021): JP3I
  3. Reinaldi

Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale Form L-M Predictive Power on Academic Achievement

Eugenius Tintus Reinaldi, Rahmat Hidayat

Abstract


Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale Form L-M test is widely used in Indonesia to assess the academic capacity of elementary school students. However, its predictive power upon academic achievements has not been examined. This research represents a preliminary attempt at closing this gap. Stanford-Binet scores obtained 1 to 3 years earlier were used to explain variations in three subject marks of 156 an Elementary School from the 3rd, 4th, and 5th Grades. Simple regression analysis shows that 4.3% to 25.4% of the variance can be explained by Stanford-Binet scores, indicating a low to moderate predictive power. The results suggest a limited predictive power of the Stanford-Binet Form L-M test for applications in the assessment of the academic capacity of elementary school children.

Keywords


academic achievement; intelligence test; predictive validity; Stanford-Binet form L-M test

References


Ackerman, P., & Beier, M. (2005). Knowledge and intelligence. In O. Wilhelm, & R. Engle, Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence. California: Sage Publications.

Allen, & Yen. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey: Brooks/Cole. Publishing Company.

Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological testing (4th edition). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (2007). Tes psikologi (edisi ketujuh). Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Astuti, E., Tarini, K., & Budiyono. (2013). Ketuntasan nilai UAS dan nilai rapor serta hubungan nilai UAS dengan nilai rapor siswa kelas III semester II mata pelajaran matematika SD Negeri se-Kecamatan Bonorowo Kabupaten Kebumen tahun ajaran 2011/2012. Ekuivalen, 4(1). Diunduh tanggal 26 Desember 2017, dari http://ejournal.umpwr.ac.id/index.php /ekuivalen/article/view/596

Azwar, S. (2008). Dasar-dasar psikometri. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.

Azwar, S. (2016). Reliabilitas dan validitas (edisi 4). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Becker, K. (2003). History of the Stanford-Binet intelligence scales: Content and psychometrics (Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition Assessment Service Bulletin No. 1). Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

Brouzos, A., Misailidi, P., & Hadjimattheou, A. (2014). Associations between emotional intelligence, socio-emotional adjustment, and academic achievement in childhood: The influence of age. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29(2), 83-99.

Chen, X., Huang, X., Chang, L., Wang, L., & Li, D. (2010). Aggression, social competence, and academic achievement in Chinese children: A 5-year longitudinal study. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 583-592.

Deary, I., Pattie, A., & Starr, J. (2013). The stability of intelligence from age 11 to age 90 years: The Lothian birth cohort of 1921. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2361-2368.

Devi, A. (2012). Assessing emotional intelligence: Academic performance & overall personality development. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 354-367.

Downey, L., Lomas, J., Billings, C., Hansen, K., & Stough, C. (2014). Scholastic success: Fluid intelligence, personality, and emotional intelligence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29(1), 40-53.

Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistic using SPSS (2nd edition). London: Sage Publication.

Gordon, M., & Cui, M. (2016). The intersection of race and community poverty and its effect on adolescents' academic achievement. Youth & Society, 1-19.

Howell, D. (2013). Statistical methods for psychology. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

Kaloiya, G., Basu, S., & Basu, S. (2017). Academic achievement, behavioral and emotional problem among marginalised children. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(3), 36-49.

Kaplan, R., & Saccuzzo, D. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (6th edition). Toronto: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Kurikulum 2013: Kompetensi dasar sekolah dasar (SD)/madrasah ibtidaiyah (MI). Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Miller, L., Lovler, R., & McIntire, S. (2013). Foundations of psychological testing. A practical approach (4th edition). California: Sage Publication.

Murphy, K., & Davidshofer, C. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (6th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Nunnally, J. (1981). Psychometric theory (2nd edition). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Co Ltd.

Roberts, R., Markham, P., Matthews, G., & Zeidner, M. (2005). Assessing intelligence: Past, present, and future. In O. Wilhelm, & R. Engle, Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence. California: Sage Publication.

Roid, G., & Barram, R. (2004). Essentials of stanford-binet intelligence scales (SB5) assessment. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T., & Engle, R. (2016). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence: Maintenance and disengagement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 771-799.

Soysal, S., Tan, S., & Aldemir, S. (2012). Accuracy of WISC-R and Raven Standard Progressive Matrices tests in mathematical success of children with ADHD. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 25, 17-26.

Stankov, L. (2004). Complexity in human intelligence. In R. Stenberg, J. Lautrey, & T. Lubart, Models of intelligence: International perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Styles, I. (1999). The study of intelligence - the interplay between theory and measurement. In M. Anderson, The development of intelligence. East Sussex: Psychology Press.

von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 574-588.

Wulan, R. (1995). Evaluasi penggunaan tes binet. Buletin Psikologi, Tahun III, Nomor 2, 49.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.20009

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Eugenius Tintus Reinaldi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.