Female Hedonistic Behavior Questionnaire (FHBQ): Psychometric Properties Based on the Rasch Model

Tina Deviana, Bahrul Hayat, Nia Tresniasari


This study aims to develop standard measurement tools from hedonistic behavior using the perspective of the Rasch measurement model. The evaluation of psychometric characteristics conducted in this study (1) to check unidimensionality, (2) testing local independence assumptions, (3) testing scale rating diagnostics, (4) testing item fit, (5) reliability for person and items, and (6) displays the wright map and test information function to compare people and items on the same scale and find out the functioning of the test when given to individuals with the level of trait obtained. The sample in this study were 335 hijab-wearing Muslim women. Rasch analysis results show that the psychometric characteristics obtained are very good and precise, as well as the suitability of the items to the model. With this, the measuring instrument developed by researchers was named the Female Hedonistic Behavior Scale (FHBQ) with 14 valid items from the Rasch rating scale model from the measurement model perspective.


hedonistic behavior; validation; Rasch model


Andrich, D., & Marais, I. (2019). A course in rasch measurement theory: Measuring in the educational, social and health sciences. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum & Associates.

Chou, Y.-T., & Wang, W.-C. (2010). Checking dimensionality in item response models with principal component analysis on standardized residuals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 717–731. doi:10.1177/0013164410379322

Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen's Q3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178-194

DiStefano, C., & Morgan, G. B. (2010). Evaluation of the BESS TRS-CA using the Rasch rating scale model. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 202–212. doi:10.1037/a0021509

Engel, J. F. Balckwel, R. D. & Miniard, P. W. 1993. Perilaku Konsumen. Jilid I. Alih Bahasa: F. X. Budi¬yanto. Jakarta: Bina Seni Rupa Aksara.

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc.

Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192. doi:10.1177/ 002224378802500207

Gulamhussein, Q., & Eaton, N. R. (2015). Hijab, religiosity, and psychological wellbeing of muslim women in the United States. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 9(2), 25-40.

Hussin H., & Abdullah S. (2014). Menangani penetrasi budaya hedonisme di kalangan mahasiswa: Satu penyelesaian menurut prespektif Islam dan Kaunseling. Pusat Kemahiran Komunikasi dan Keusahawanan Universiti Kejuruteraan Utara Malaysia.

Hamzah, S. R., Krauss, S., Suandi, T., Hamzah, A., & Tamam, E. (2013). The influence of religiosity, parental and peer attachment on hedonistic behavior among Malaysian youth. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 393-397.

Hamzah, S. R., Suandi, T., Krauss, S. E., Hamzah, A. & Tamam, E. (2014). Youth hedonistic behaviour: moderating role of peer attachment on the effect of religiosity and worldview, International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 19(4), 419-433

Kim, S., & Kyllonen, P. C. (2006). Rasch rating scale modeling of data from the standardized letter of recommendation (ETS Research Report RR-0633). Princeton, NJ: EducationalTesting Service

Kunzmann, U., Stange, A., & Jordan, J. (2005). Positive affectivity and lifestyle in adulthood: do you do what you feel? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 574-588

Linacre, J. M. (1998). Detecting multidimensionality: Which residual data-type works best? Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 266–283.

Linacre, J. M. (2008). WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program [Version 3.65.0]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.

Luo, X., Cappelleri, J. C., Cella, D., Li, J. Z., Charbonneau, C., Kim, S. T., Motzer, R. J. (2009). Using the Rasch model to validate and enhance the interpretation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy–kidney symptom index—disease-related symptoms scale. Value In Health, 12, 580–586. doi:10.1111/j.15244733.2008.00473.x

Mair, P. (2018). Modern psychometrics with R. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1984). The essential process in a family of measurement models. Psychometrika, 49, 529–544. doi:10.1007/ BF02302590

Nadzir M. & Ingarianti T. M. (2015). Psychological meaning of money dengan gaya hidup hedonis remaja di kota Malang. Seminar Psikologi dan Kemanusiaan Psychology Forum UMM, ISBN:978-979-796-324-8, 586-596.

Pichardo M. C. et al (2018). Self Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ) in Spanish Adolescents: Factor Structure and Rasch Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9

Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M.E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.

Rofhani. (2017). Ekspresi dan representasi budaya perempuan Muslim kelas menengah di Surabaya. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Vol. 1, No. 2. p-ISSN:1978-3183;e-ISSN:2356-2218;277-310.

Saputri. A., & Rachmatan. R. (2016). Religiusitas dengan gaya hidup hedonisme: Sebuah gambaran pada mahasiswa Universitas Syiah Kuala. Jurnal Psikologi, Vol. 12.

Sholeh A. (2017). The Relationship among hedonistic lifestyle, life satisfaction, and happiness on college students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 7, Vol. 9, 1 5.

Smith, R. M. (1996). A comparison of methods for determining dimensionality in Rasch measurement. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 25-40

Sobol-Kwapinska, M. (2013). Hedonism, fatalism and ‘carpe diem’: Profiles of attitudes towards the present time. Time & Society, 22(3) 371–390.

Sudarsih, (2017). Konsep hedonisme epikorus dan situasi Indonesia masa kini.

Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Humaniora, 4 (1). DOI:10.14710/humanica.14.1, [https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/humanika/article/view/4008]

Teo C. B. C., & Sidin S. (2014). Development and validation of female hedonic orientation scale. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 130, 390 – 399.

Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care and Research, 5(8), 1358–1362

Wells, W. D., & Tigert, D. (1971). Activities, interests, and, opinions. Journal of Advertising Research, 11(4), 27-35

Wright, B. D. (1996). Local dependency, correlations, and principal components. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10(3), 509-511

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.15132


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Tina Deviana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.