Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Manjemen Dakwah (P-ISSN: 2338-3992) adalah jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Jurusan Manajemen Dakwah UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta bekerjasama dengan Perkumpulan Akademisi dan Profesi Da'i Indonesia (APDI), setahun 2 kali (Juni-Desember). Jurnal ini hadir sebagai sarana publikasi karya-karya dengan fokus dalam bidang manajemen dakwah. Adapun lingkup jurnal meliputi manajemen dakwah, strategi dakwah, administasi dakwah, manajemen haji dan Umroh, manajemen zakat, infak dan sedekah, serta Manajemen Keuangan Islam.

Setiap naskah yang diterbitkan di Jurnal Manjemen Dakwah akan melewati proses review menggunakan sistem double-blind review, artinya penulis tidak mengetahui reviewer dan reviewer tidak mengetahui nama penulis.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Beberapa kebijakan review dalam Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Setiap naskah yang masuk akan dicek menggunakan web anti plagiarisme, Plagiarism CheckerX, atau turnitin.
  2. Setiap naskah yang masuk akan melalui proses review
  3. Proses reviewe menggunakan double-blind peer review
  4. Dalam proses review mitra bebestari memberikanan pertimbangan terkait dengan kebaruan, dampak ilmiah, simpulan dan referensi yang digunakan.

Keputusan reviewer akan menjadi pertimbangan editor untuk :

  1. Accept Submission (menerima naskah)
  2. Revisions Required (naskah perlu direvisi)
  3. Resubmit for review (mengirimkan naskah kembali)
  4. Resubmit elsewhere (mengirimkan naskah ke jurnal lain)
  5. Decline Submission (menolak naskah)

Naskah yang ditolah untuk publikasi karena beberapa alasan, yaitu:

  1. Artikel tidak sesuai dengan lingkup jurnal.
  2. Artikel tidak mengikuti aturan penulisan karya ilmiah atau pedoman penulisan jurnal.
  3. Kesalahan fatal dalam metodologi.
  4. Penulis menolak saran perbaikan yang diberikan oleh reviewer tanpa alasan yang bisa diterima.
  5. Naskah terindikasi plagiarisme dengan similarity lebih dari 20%.


Publication Frequency

Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah terbit setahun dua kali yaitu Bulan Juni dan Desember.


Open Access Policy

Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative



Publication Ethics


Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah is a peer-reviewed journal published Faculty of Dakwah and Communication, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical guidelines for journal publication(based on Elsevier policies)


Please complete and return this form via email, and retaining a copy for your records.

Jurnal Cita Hukum is the normal channel for publication concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. Manuscripts reporting experimentation or research in field crops will be accepted for review as papers.

Faculty of Sharia and Law in cooperation with Center for the Study of Constitution and National Legislation (POSKO-LEGNAS) with publisher take its duties of guardianship over all publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities

We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition Jurnal Cita Hukum will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.



(based on Elsevier policies and COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)


Reporting standards


Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. "Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable". Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial opinion works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper as the author's own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper. Publication of some kinds of articles (e.g. guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.

Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors ( so its mean that manuscript at least have author and co author). Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.



(based on Elsevier policies and COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)


Publication decisions

The editor of a peer-reviewed Jurnal Cita Hukum is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication. If needed, other appropriate action should be taken, such as the publication of a retraction or expression of concern.

Involvement and cooperation in investigations

An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant. Every reported act of unethical publishing behavior must be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication.



(based on Elsevier policies and COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)


Contribution to editorial decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication, and lies at the heart of the scientific method.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.


Plagiarism Checker

Setiap naskah yang masuk ke redaksi Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah akan diproses screening plagiarism menggunakan Plagiarism CheckerX, atau turnitin.


Reference Management

Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah dalam penulisan sitasi dan Daftar Pustaka menggunakan Software Manajemen Referensi Mendeley.