Anti-Corruption Strategies in Jakarta Provincial Government: Educational, Preventive and Represive Approaches
Abstract
Abstract. Anti-corruption programs are the government's efforts to minimize the risk of corruption within the bureaucracy. However, implementing anti-corruption strategies often faces challenges, including the lack of coordination between the approaches used. Educative, preventive, and repressive approaches are often not well-coordinated, thus affecting the success of these anti-corruption programs. Therefore, this research evaluates the effectiveness of educational, preventive, and repressive programs implemented by the Jakarta Provincial Government in combating corruption, as measured by the Corruption Control Effectiveness Index (IEPK) through the Nvivo 14 Method. The study reveals that eight final verdict corruption cases occurred between 2017 and 2023, with seven of these cases arising before implementing the IEPK assessment model. Notably, the IEPK value improved from 2.94 in 2022 to 3.28 in 2023, indicating a shift from a "Learning" category to "Working," which suggests a reduction in corruption levels. While the findings highlight advancements in corruption control efforts, the reliance on corruption level data poses limitations, as it excludes ongoing cases that could accurately represent corruption levels. Future research should explore the impact of these improvements on governance and consider a broader range of data sources.
Keywords: Anti-Corruption Strategies, IEPK, Level of Corruption, Nvivo 14.
Abstrak. Program anti-korupsi adalah upaya pemerintah untuk meminimalkan risiko korupsi dalam birokrasi. Namun, pelaksanaan strategi anti-korupsi sering menghadapi tantangan, salah satunya adalah kurangnya koordinasi antara pendekatan yang digunakan. Pendekatan edukasi, pencegahan, dan represif sering kali tidak terkoordinasi dengan baik, sehingga memengaruhi keberhasilan program anti-korupsi tersebut. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini mengevaluasi efektivitas program edukasi, pencegahan, dan represif yang diterapkan oleh Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta dalam memerangi korupsi, yang diukur melalui Indeks Efektivitas Pengendalian Korupsi (IEPK) melalui Metode Nvivo 14. Studi ini mengungkapkan bahwa delapan kasus korupsi dengan putusan inkracht terjadi antara tahun 2017 dan 2023, di mana tujuh dari kasus tersebut muncul sebelum penerapan model penilaian IEPK. Secara signifikan, nilai IEPK meningkat dari 2,94 pada tahun 2022 menjadi 3,28 pada tahun 2023, menunjukkan pergeseran dari kategori "Belajar" menjadi "Bekerja," yang mengindikasikan penurunan tingkat korupsi. Meskipun temuan ini menyoroti kemajuan dalam upaya pengendalian korupsi, ketergantungan pada data tingkat korupsi menunjukkan keterbatasan, karena tidak mencakup kasus yang sedang berjalan yang dapat secara akurat mencerminkan tingkat korupsi. Penelitian di masa depan harus mengeksplorasi dampak dari perbaikan ini terhadap pemerintahan dan mempertimbangkan berbagai sumber data yang lebih luas.
Kata Kunci: Strategi Anti Korupsi, IEPK, Tingkat Korupsi, NVivo 14.
Keywords
References
Hermawan, D., Fatullah, A. P., Cayadi, C., Hidayat, A., & Jainah, Z. O. (2024). Analisis Dampak Korupsi Dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur Di Negara Berkembang. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 4259–4271. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/7045
Refangga, G. S., Arifin, R., Soleh, M., & Santoso, S. B. (2024). Mencegah Kejahatan Keuangan : Peran Auditor Investigasi dalam Mengungkap Penggelapan Pajak. 4, 15116–15131.
, M. I. A.-F., Pupung Purnamasari, & Mey Maemunah. (2024). Pengaruh Opini Audit dan Temuan Audit terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah. Bandung Conference Series: Accountancy, 4(1), 728–737. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsa.v4i1.12454
Nadir, N. (2024). The Urgency of Anti-Corruption Education Course in Universities as a Long-Term Approach Model to Preventing Corrupt Behavior and Criminal Acts of Corruption. Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 795–806. https://jer.or.id/index.php/jer/article/view/894%0Ahttps://jer.or.id/index.php/jer/article/download/894/513
Riadi, N. N., Adli, M., Septiani, D., Seftiyani, W., & Nuraeni, L. (2024). Perbandingan Indeks Perilaku Anti Korupsi Di Indonesia Antara Tahun 2020 Sampai Dengan Tahun 2023.
Heliany, I., Asmadi, E., Sitinjak, H., & Fahmi Lubis, A. (2023). the Role of Corruption Education in Combating Corruption Crimes in the Future. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 10(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i2.32344
Saputra, K. A. K., Mu’ah, Jurana, Korompis, C. W. M., & Manurung, D. T. H. (2022). Fraud Prevention Determinants: A Balinese Cultural Overview. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i3.11
Br Purba, R., Aulia, F., Umar, H., & Khamilah Siregar, O. (2022). The Supervision Model For Village Financial Management In Preventing Corruption In Village Funds. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(10), 3504–3513. http://journalppw.com
ACFE. (2022). A Report To The Nations. Occupational Fraud 2022, 1–96.
Sudarmanto E, Arumsari A, Hardianto A.T, Tito I.J.H. 2022. Buku Teori dan Metodologi Manajemen Risiko Korupsi Pendekatan Integratif, Interaksionis, dan Prosesual. Mahardianingtyas S, Heviko M A, editor. Jakarta: Penerbit Balai Pustaka
Studi, P., Akuntansi, M., Ekonomika, F., Bisnis, D. A. N., & Diponegoro, U. (2021). PEMERINTAH DAERAH DI INDONESIA DENGAN SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERN.
Suhartono, R. (2021). Pengaruh Maturitas Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) dan Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) Terhadap Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia. Jurnal Mahasiswa Magister Akuntansi, 6(2).
Mugellini, G., Della Bella, S., Colagrossi, M., Isenring, G. L., & Killias, M. (2021). Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1173
Musofiana, I. (2020). Anti-Corruption Education at An Early Age as A Strategic Move to Prevent Corruption in Indonesia. Unissula Press, 304–312. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/the2ndproceeding/article/view/1098
Xiao, H., Gong, T., Yu, C., Juang, W. J., & Yuan, B. (2020). Citizens’ Confidence in Government Control of Corruption: An Empirical Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 152(3), 877–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02456-y
Sani Catur Putra Husain, G., Rachmat Hambali, A., Fadhillah Mappaseleng, N., & Kunci, K. (2020). Indonesia Journal of Criminal Law Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terhadap Dana Pembangunan Daerah: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Mamuju Artikel dengan akses terbuka dibawah lisensi CC BY. 2(2), 93–104.
Mouna, A., Nedra, B., & Khaireddine, M. (2020). International comparative evidence of e-government success and economic growth: technology adoption as an anti-corruption tool. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(5), 713–736. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2020-0040
Najih, M., & Wiryani, F. (2020). Learning the social impact of corruption: A study of legal policy and corruption prevention in indonesia and malaysia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(4), 175–189.
Apriani, U. (2020). Pengaruh Komponen-Komponen Fraud Star Terhadap Korupsi Dengan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (Spip) Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.25105/jmat.v7i1.6311
Maulidi, A., & Ansell, J. (2020). Tackling practical issues in fraud control: a practice-based study. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2020-0150
Bautista-Beauchesne, N., & Garzon, C. (2019). Conceptualizing corruption prevention: a systematic literature review. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(3), 719–745. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-10-2018-0106
Kurniasari, N. T., Fariyanti, A., & Ristiyanto, N. (2019). Strategi Pencegahan Kecurangan (Fraud) Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Pemerintah Menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Manajemen Pembangunan Daerah, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.29244/jurnal_mpd.v9i2.27633
Dirwan, A. (2019). The effect of education against corruption in Indonesia. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(01), 53–64. www.oidaijsd.comalsoavailableathttp://www.ssrn.com/link/OIDA-Intl-Journal-Sustainable-Dev.html
Jeppesen, K. K. (2019). The role of auditing in the fight against corruption. British Accounting Review, 51(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.06.001
Valerian, D. (2019). Meretas Konsep Baru Pidana Denda terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 5(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.342
Choi, J. W. (2018). Corruption control and prevention in the Korean government: Achievements and challenges from an institutional perspective. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-11-2017-0111
Tunley, M., Button, M., Shepherd, D., & Blackbourn, D. (2018). Preventing occupational corruption: Utilising situational crime prevention techniques and theory to enhance organisational resilience. In Security Journal (Vol. 31, Issue 1). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-016-0087-5
Rini, R., & Damiati, L. (2017). Analisis Hasil Audit Pemerintahan dan Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintahan Provinsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 4(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v4i1.4933
Borcan, O., Lindahl, M., & Mitrut, A. (2017). Fighting corruption in education: What works and who benefits? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(1), 180–209. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150074
Heriningsih, S. (2013). Pengaruh Opini Audit Dan Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Empiris Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Dan Kota Di Pulau Jawa). Buletin Ekonomi, 11(1), 1–86.
DOI: 10.15408/jisi.v5i2.41570
Copyright (c) 2024 Dedy Rahman, A. Faroby Falatehan, Arief Tri Hardiyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Hide
Show all