DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM MENGENAI TINDAK PIDANA PEREDARAN KOSMETIK TANPA IZIN EDAR

Rizka Dewanti, Abdurrahman Dahlan, Mustolih Siradj

Abstract


Cosmetics comes from the Greek, namely Kosmetikos which means to decorate, arrange. According to the Big Indonesian Dictionary (KBBI), disparity means difference or distance. Disparity comes from the word (disparity: dis-parity) which is the negation of the concept of parity (parity) which means equal value or amount. In the context of sentencing, parita has the meaning of equality of punishment between similar crimes under similar conditions. Thus disparity is the unequal punishment between similar crimes under similar conditions and situations. The researcher uses the type of juridical-normative research and the data collection method uses a library search (Library Search) using information materials in the form of legislation, court decisions, books, documents related to the title of this research. These three decisions are subject to sanctions that can be said to be quite light because they are calculated only within a month which does not cause a deterrent effect on producers who continue to resell them, because after the facts were found in the trial the three producers had previously been warned by the related parties. As for the view of Islamic law, the criminal act of distributing cosmetics without a distribution permit is a finger of Tadlis part of the finger of ta'zir whose punishment is determined by Ulil Amri (Judge) with of course considering the benefit of the community.

Keywords


Disparity, Crime, Cosmetics Without Circulation Permit and Islamic Criminal Law

References


Ali, Zainuddin. 2012. Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Fatimah, Siti. 2016. “Analisis Praktek Tadlis Pada Masyarakat Kota Makassar (Studi Lapangan Pedagang Buah-Buahan Di Kota Makassar).” Jurnal Ilmiah Bongaya: 223.

Hakim, Rahmat. 2000. Hukum Pidana Islam (Fiqh Jinayah). Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Hidayat, Ophierosaria. 2016. “Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana Penjara Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Yang Dilakukan Terhadap Anak.” Universitas Brawijaya, 2016.

Moeljatno. 2002. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. 7th ed. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Sholehah, Nur Annisa. 2021. “Disparitas Pemidanaan Dalam Putusan Hakim Terhadap Delik Penganiayaan Antara Oknum Polri Dan Masyarakat (Studi Putusan Nomor: 371/Pid. B/2020/PN. Jkt. Utr Dan Putusan Nomor: 414/Pid. B/2017/PN. Bta).” . Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

SI., Dr. Ir. Wisnu Cahayadi M. 2010. Bahan Tambahan Pangan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sianturi, E. Y Kanter dan S. R. 2002. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Penerapannya.

Jakarta: Storia Grafika.

Prayoga, Reza. 2017. “Tinjauan Fiqh Jinayah Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Vaksin Imunisasi Menurut Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.” UIN Raden Fatah Palembang.

Waluyo, Bambang. 2014. Pidana Dan Pemidanaan. 4th ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Yani, Gunawan Widjaja dan Ahmad. 2000. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta.

Yurnita, Neli. 2021. ““Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Tanah Ditinjau Dari Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam.” Yurnita, Neli,. “Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat TaUIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi.

Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen Nomor 8 Tahun 1999. Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.

Penjelasan Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 72 Tahun 1998 Tentang Pengamanan Sediaan Farmasi dan Alat Kesehatan.

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan 175/MENKES/PER/VIII/2010 Tentang Izin Kosmetika.. Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009, Pasal 8 ayat (2).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jicl.v1i1.31226 Abstract - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.