Liquidity Potential Analysis of Sharia Banks Using Stock-Based and Flow-Based Methods
Abstract
Abstract. Bank liquidity is adequate if the bank has sufficient funds when depositors withdraw them. The bank’s inability to meet its depositors’ rights will negatively affect public confidence and bank profitability. This study is to identify the potential liquidity risk of Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia using the Stock-Based and Flow-Based Methods based on OJK regulation. The assessment of the potential for liquidity risk using the stock-based method and the weight of the inherent risk value results in the statement risk level for each Islamic commercial Bank, ranging from 2.25 (low) to 2.85 (moderate). The flow-based method results in a negative liquidity gap. This research finds that bank liquidity has no significant impact on its profitability. The research provides direction for Islamic commercial banks in measuring liquidity risk so that the bank can formulate strategies for risk mitigation and control to avoid financial distress.
Keywords: Flow-Based, Liquidity, Profitability, Risk Management, Stock-Based
Abstrak. Likuiditas bank dikatakan baik apabila bank mampu memenuhi dana yang dibutuhkan saat deposan melakukan penarikan. Namun, jika bank tidak mampu memenuhi dana yang dibutuhkan oleh para deposan, maka tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat bisa berkurang dan memengaruhi profitabilitas bank. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi potensi resiko likuiditas Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia dengan Metode Stock- Based dan Flow-Based, berdasarkan peraturan OJK. Penilaian potensi terjadinya risiko likuiditas dengan menggunakan metode stock-based dan bobot nilai risiko inheren memperoleh hasil tingkat risiko pada masing-masing bank umum syariah yang berkisar antara 2,55 (moderate) sampai dengan 3,15 (moderate). Metode flow-based, secara keseluruhan, menghasilkan gap likuiditas negatif. Dalam penelitian ini, tidak terdapat pengaruh likuiditas bank terhadap profitabilitas. Penelitian ini bermanfaat untuk memberikan arahan kepada Bank Umum Syariah dalam mengukur Risiko Likuiditas sehingga Bank mampu merumuskan strategi untuk mitigasi dan pengendalian risiko untuk menghindari kondisi Financial Distress.
Kata kunci: Flow-Based, Likuiditas, Manajemen Risiko, Profitabilitas, Stock-Based
Keywords
References
Afriyeni, A., & Susanto, R. (2019). Manajemen Risiko Pada Bank Syariah. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/yj9kb
Al-Harbi, A. (2020). Determinates of Islamic banks liquidity. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(8), 1619–1632. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2016-0096
Anam, A. K. (2013). Risiko Likuiditas Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Perbankan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 10(1), 1–16. https://ejournal.unisnu.ac.id/JDEB/article/view/20
Bani, F., & Yaya, R. (2016). Rasio Likuiditas Pada Perbankan Konvensional dan Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Bisnis, 16(1), 1–26. http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/akuntan/article/download/1716/1750
Bank BNI Syariah. (2019). Annual Report Tahunan BNI Syariah. https://www.bnisyariah.co.id/Portals/1/BNISyariah/Perusahaan/Hubungan Investor/AR/Annual Report BNI Syariah-bahasa.pdf
Bank Indonesia. (2003). Peraturan Bank Indonesia No: 5/8/PBI/2003 Tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Bagi Bank Umum. 1–14. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/137775/peraturan-bi-no-58pbi2003
Bank Indonesia. (2004). Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia. Sistem Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. No. 6/23/DPNP. 6, 55. https://www.bi.go.id/id/archive/arsip-peraturan/Documents/0151b17420f84d118de8fdf0c0642730se623dpnp.pdf
Bank Indonesia. (2009). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 11/ 25 /Pbi/2009 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 5/8/Pbi/2003 Tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Bagi Bank Umum. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 11/ 25 /Pbi/2009. http://www.bi.go.id/id/peraturan/perbankan/Pages/pbi_112509.aspx
Bank Indonesia. (2015). Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Bank Umum Syariah dan Unit Usaha Syariah. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 13/23/PBI/2011, 1(Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Bagi Bank Umum Syariah Dan Unit Usaha Syariah), 1–43. www.bi.go.id
Bank Mega Syariah. (2019). Annual Report Bank Mega Syariah. 1–727. https://www.megasyariah.co.id/
Bank Muamalat. (2019). Annual Report Bank Muamalat. https://www.bankmuamalat.co.id/hubungan-investor/laporan-tahunan
Bank Panin Dubai Syariah. (2019). Annual Report Panin Dubai Syariah. https://www.paninbanksyariah.co.id/index.php/mtentangkami/laporantahunan
Bank Syariah Mandiri. (2019). Laporan Tahunan 2019 : Memberikan Nilai Tambah Melalui Pengembangan Kapabilitas Internal. PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri, 412. https://www.mandirisyariah.co.id/assets/pdf/annual-report/Bank-Syariah_mandiri-Annual-Report2019(Update).pdf
BCA Syariah. (2019). Annual Report. https://www.bcasyariah.co.id/laporan-tahunan
Ben Jedidia, K. (2020). Profit- and loss-sharing impact on Islamic bank liquidity in GCC countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(9), 1791–1806. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2018-0157
BRI Syariah. (2019). Annual Report. 87. https://ir.bankbsi.co.id/annual_reports.html
Fasa, M. I. (2016). Manajemen Risiko Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Li Falah Jurnal Studi Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, I(2), 36–53. https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/lifalah/article/view/482
Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. (2014). Memahami Bisnis Bank : Modul Sertifikasi Tingkat 1 General Bangking / Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. (2015a). Manajemen Risiko 1. Mengidentifikasi Risiko Pasar, Operasional, dan Kredit Bank. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. (2015b). Manajemen Risiko 2. Mengidentifikasi Risiko Likuiditas, Reputasi, Hukum, Kepatuhan, dan Strategik Bank. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. (2015c). Manajemen Risiko 2. Mengidentifikasi Risiko Likuiditas, Reputasi, Hukum, Kepatuhan, dan Strategik Bank. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ismal, R. (2010). Assessment of liquidity management in Islamic banking industry. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391011054381
Karim, A. A. (2011). Bank Islam : Analisis Fiqh dan Keuangan. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
keuangan.kontan.co.id. (n.d.). Risiko Likuiditas Bank Kecil Paling Tinggi. http://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/risiko-likuiditas-bank-kecil-paling-tinggi
Lestari, H. S., Tarigan, G. G., & Pohan, L. A. (2021). The Effect of Liquidity, Leverage and Bank’s Size on Bank’s Profitability of Indonesian Listed Bank. Jurnal Manajemen, 12(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v12i2.3946
Lukito, S. N., Muturi, W., Nyang’au, A. S., & Nyamasege, D. (2014). Assessing the effect of liquidity on profitability of commercial banks in Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(19), 145. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234630201.pdf
Moussa, D. M. A. Ben, & Boubaker, A. (2020). The Impact of Liquidity on Bank Profitability: Case of Tunisia. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 8(2), 20–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37745/ejaafr/vol8.no2.pp20-37.2020
Muharam, H., & Kurnia, H. P. (2015). Liquidity Risk on Banking Industry: Comparative Study Between Islamic Bank and Conventional Bank in Indonesia. Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v5i2.2565
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 14/SEOJK.03/2017 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 33. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/regulasi/surat-edaran-ojk/Pages/Surat-Edaran-Otoritas-Jasa-Keuangan-Nomor-14-SEOJK.03-2017.aspx
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Statistik Perbankan Syariah. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Syariah---Desember-2020.aspx
Parvin, S., Chowdhury, A. N. M. M. H., Siddiqua, A., & Ferdous, J. (2019). Effect of Liquidity and Bank Size on the Profitability of Commercial Banks in Bangladesh. Asian Business Consortium, 9(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v9i1.219
Qurban, S. N. M. A., Shaheen, R., & Hakim, S. (2021). the Effect of Liquidity and Rate of Return Risks on the Profitability of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Gcc Countries. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(13), 569–579. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/8142
Sahyouni, A., & Wang, M. (2019). Liquidity creation and bank performance: evidence from MENA. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 11(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2018-0009
Santoso, A. L., & Sukihanjani, T. (2012). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Likuiditas Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Universitas Sebelas Maret, 221–231. http://jp.feb.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/sca-1/article/viewFile/298/303
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. PT Alfabet.
Supartoyo, Y. H., Juanda, B., Firdaus, M., & Effendi, J. (2018). Pengaruh Sektor Keuangan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat terhadap Perekonomian Regional Wilayah Sulawesi. Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 2(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v2i1.207
Umar, M., & Sun, G. (2016). Determinants of different types of bank liquidity: evidence from BRICS countries. China Finance Review International, 6(4), 380–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-07-2015-0113
DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v13i2.22571
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
