ApplicaApplication of Computer Polygraph in Forensic Psychological Expert Research During Pre-Trial Investigation of Criminal Offensestion of computer polygraph in forensic psychological expert research during pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v14i2.53584Keywords:
Computer polygraph, Forensic psychological examination, Pre-trial investigation, Methodological transparency, Procedural guaranteesAbstract
The article examines the methodological and procedural conditions under which the use of a computer polygraph within the framework of forensic psychological expert research at the stage of pre-trial investigation can be considered scientifically justified and procedurally acceptable. The study was implemented in the format of a sequential mixed design: in stage A, a quantitative content analysis of 60 depersonalized conclusions/reports of polygraph examinations in criminal proceedings was carried out, and in stage B, a two-wave structured survey of the expert community (N = 110; polygraph examiners, forensic psychologists/experts, investigators/prosecutors, lawyers) was conducted to form a consensus on a minimum standard. The quality of documentation was operationalized through the methodological transparency index (MPI) and the procedural compliance index (PCI). The reports were found to be moderately transparent (MPI M = 44.2) and marginally compliant (PCI M = 38.4), with moderate correlation between the indices (r = .54; p < .001), indicating incomplete agreement between the methodological and procedural components. Systemic deficiencies in documentation were identified, including the lack of alternative explanations for responses, countermeasures, and evidence of test invalidity; CIT/GKT documents showed higher MPI and PCI than CQT. Phase B results showed an acceptable level of agreement (Kendall’s W = .74) and a consensus minimum standard of 11 criteria was developed. A comparison of the stages revealed a significant gap between practice and the normatively expected standard, which outlines priorities for unifying documentation and increasing the evidentiary reliability of results.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Oleksandr Yevsiukov, Yuliia Sukhomlyn, Serhii Mytych, Borys Lukianchykov, Olena Riashko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






