Enhancing Restorative Justice through Victim and Witness Protection Measures
Abstract
This research explores the pivotal role of victim and witness protection measures in augmenting the principles and effectiveness of restorative justice. Restorative justice, as a paradigm, seeks to address harm caused by criminal behavior by involving all relevant parties in a collective and participatory resolution process. The well-being and cooperation of victims and witnesses are critical components for the success of restorative justice initiatives. This study investigates the ways in which comprehensive protection measures contribute to creating a supportive environment, fostering trust, and facilitating the engagement of victims and witnesses in the restorative justice process. The analysis encompasses various aspects of victim and witness protection, including physical safety, emotional well-being, and legal considerations. By examining existing programs and policies, the research identifies best practices and areas for improvement in ensuring the security and confidentiality of those participating in restorative justice proceedings. Additionally, the study assesses the impact of protection measures on the willingness of victims and witnesses to actively participate, share their perspectives, and collaborate towards achieving meaningful resolutions. Ultimately, this research aims to provide insights and recommendations for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars to enhance the integration of victim and witness protection measures within restorative justice frameworks. By prioritizing the safety and support of individuals involved, the justice system can better fulfill its commitment to addressing harm, promoting accountability, and fostering healing within communities affected by criminal acts.
References
Akram, Muhammad, et al. “Restorative Justice Approach to Cow Vigilante Violence in India.” Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, pp. 190–205. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/48710279. Accessed 21 Feb. 2024.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 § 398
Braithwaite, John. “Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts.” Crime and Justice, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 1–127. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147608. Accessed 19 Jan. 2024.
Clarke, Ronald V. “Situational Crime Prevention.” Crime and Justice, vol. 19, 1995, pp. 91–150. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147596. Accessed 22 Jan. 2024.
Concept, values and origin of restorative justice, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, available at https://www.unodc.org/e4j/zh/crime-prevention-criminal-justice/module-8/key-issues/1--concept--values-and-origin-of-restorative-justice.html Accessed on 22 Jan 2024
Cremin, Hilary, et al. “INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: DEVELOPING INSIGHTS FOR EDUCATION.” British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 60, no. 4, 2012, pp. 421–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23359844. Accessed 27 Jan. 2024.
Crime in India. Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 43, no. 3, 2008, pp. 6–7. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40276913. Accessed 4 Feb. 2024.
David, Gary C., et al. “Playing the Interrogation Game: Rapport, Coercion, and Confessions in Police Interrogations.” Symbolic Interaction, vol. 41, no. 1, 2018, pp. 3–24. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/90018564. Accessed 5 Feb. 2024.
Development Services Group, Inc. 2010. “Restorative Justice.” Literature review. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Restorative_Justice.pdf
Dzur, Albert W. “Civic Implications of Restorative Justice Theory: Citizen Participation and Criminal Justice Policy.” Policy Sciences, vol. 36, no. 3/4, 2003, pp. 279–306. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4532603. Accessed 27 Jan. 2024.
Eskridge, William N. “Dynamic Statutory Interpretation.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 135, no. 6, 1987, pp. 1479–555. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3312014. Accessed 26 Jan. 2024.
Fenney, Alethia Z., "Navajo Peacemaking and Māori Restorative Justice: a Comparison of Process and Procedure" (2012). Regis University Student Publications (comprehensive collection). 247.https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/247
Gaudelli, William. “Convergence of Technology and Diversity: Experiences of Two Beginning Teachers in Web-Based Distance Learning for Global/Multicultural Education.” Teacher Education Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 1, 2006, pp. 97–116. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478737. Accessed 24 Jan. 2024.
Good practices for the protection of witnesses in criminal proceedings involving organized crime, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Vienna, 2008.
Goodstein, Jerry, and Kenneth D. Butterfield. “Extending the Horizon of Business Ethics: Restorative Justice and the Aftermath of Unethical Behavior.” Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, 2010, pp. 453–80. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25702409. Accessed 1 Feb. 2024.
Howard, Jeffrey W. “PUNISHMENT AS MORAL FORTIFICATION.” Law and Philosophy, vol. 36, no. 1, 2017, pp. 45–75. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44980865. Accessed 1 Feb. 2024.
Jauregui, Beatrice. “Beatings, Beacons, and Big Men: Police Disempowerment and Delegitimation in India.” Law & Social Inquiry, vol. 38, no. 3, 2013, pp. 643–69. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24545738. Accessed 7 Feb. 2024.
Kidder, Robert L. “Law and Political Crisis: An Assessment of the Indian Legal System’s Potential Role.” Asian Survey, vol. 16, no. 9, 1976, pp. 879–97. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2643248. Accessed 5 Feb. 2024.
Mahender Chawla and others vs. Union of India [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 156 of 2016]
Miers, David. “The Responsibilities and the Rights of Victims of Crime.” The Modern Law Review, vol. 55, no. 4, 1992, pp. 482–505. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1096650. Accessed 21 Feb. 2024.
PAUS, KAREN KRISTIN. “The National Mediation Service—A Top-down Grassroots Movement?” Federal Sentencing Reporter, vol. 31, no. 1, 2018, pp. 37–47. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26586184. Accessed 2 Feb. 2024.
Schoener, Wendy. “Non-Governmental Organizations and Global Activism: Legal and Informal Approaches.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, 1997, pp. 537–69. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20644662. Accessed 7 Feb. 2024.
United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols, 15 November 2000, by resolution 55/25 adopted by UN General Assembly.
Wagoner, David. “Witness Protection.” The American Poetry Review, vol. 32, no. 1, 2003, pp. 44–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20682115. Accessed 4 Feb. 2024.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v12i3.42272 Abstract - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
