State’s Obligation to Protect Human Rights in Business Activities According to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations Protect, Respect, and Remedy Framework - Recommendations for Vietnam
Abstract
The state’s duty to protect human rights in corporate activities, as outlined in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP), is essential in promoting, respecting, and safeguarding human rights within the business sector. This article examines the state's obligations under the UNGP in the context of corporate activities. It connects this analysis with the development and application of a National Action Plan (NAP) based on the general provisions of the UNGP. Employing a qualitative research methodology, the study utilises a doctrinal approach to analyse international legal instruments, national policies, and academic literature related to the UNGP framework. Additionally, the article incorporates a comparative approach, reviewing examples of NAP implementation in various countries to provide practical insights for Vietnam. The findings emphasise aligning Vietnam's legal and policy frameworks with the UNGP to enhance corporate accountability and human rights protection. The study concludes with several actionable recommendations for Vietnam to implement the UNGP effectively, considering its unique socio-economic context and the demands of global development. These recommendations aim to strengthen Vietnam's capacity to address human rights challenges in corporate practices and contribute to its sustainable development goals.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A Rasche, S. W. (2021). The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implications for corporate social responsibility research. Business and Human Rights Journal.
Article 1, 3, UDHR 1948. (n.d.).
Augenstein, D. M. (2017). Implementing the UNGPs in the European Union: Towards an open method of coordination for business and human rights. EUI Department of Law Research Paper.
Bao, L. N. (2024). The goals of social enterprise activities and the responsibilities of managers. Vietnamese Legal Science Journal, Issue 6 (178).
Bernaz, N. (2006). Business and Human Rights: History, Law and Policy - Bridging the Accountability Gap. Routledge.
Buhmann, K. (2015). Business and Human Rights: Understanding the UN Guiding Principles from the perspective of transnational business governance interactions. Transnational Legal Theory, Volume 6, Issue 2, 399-434.
Carrasco, C. M. (2022). The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: What contribution are the National Action Plans making? Research Handbook on Global Governance. Business and Human Rights.
Chaffar, W. (2017). Citizenship, rights and adversarial legalism in Thailand. Citizenship and Democratization in Southeast Asia, 238-264.
Chapter 2, NAP. (n.d.).
Claire Methven O'Brien, A. M. (2016). National Action Plans: Current Status and Future Prospects for a New Business and Human Rights Governance Tool. Cambridge University Press, 117.
Comment on principle 3, UNGP. (n.d.).
Council, U. H. (2008). Resolution 8/7: Mandate of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises.
David, B. (2009). The Ruggie Framework: A complete assessment criterion for corporate human rights obligations?
Deva, S. (2012). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implications for Companies. European Company Law, Vol. 9, No. 2, 101–109.
Dokho, M. (2019). Thailand's engagement with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPS): Motives behind the implementation of the action plan. A thesis. Thammasat University.
Dung, L. V. (2024). Signing, ratifying, joining, and implementing international human rights treaties in Vietnam: Achievements and some recommendations. Journal of Democracy and Law, Issue 411.
Environmental, Social and Governance standards. (n.d.).
Ethics, T. K. (2012). The U.N. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Analysis and Implementation.
Faracik, B. (2017). Implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. European Parliament.
General Assembly, Security Council, Economic and Social Council - ECOSOC, Trusteeship Council, and International Court of Justice - ICJ. (n.d.).
German National Action Plan. (n.d.).
Guangyou Zhou, L. L. (2021). Sustainable development, ESG performance, and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 3371.
Hang Nguyen Thi Thuy, H. N. (n.d.). Human Rights and Business: A Lesson from Vietnam. p. 468.
Hoang Thi Hong Le, D. T. (2022). The impact of green supply chain management on business performance in the construction industry in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development, 145–155.
Huong, L. T. (2024). Ensuring personal rights of workers under current Vietnamese labor law. People's Court e-Magazine, https://tapchitoaan.vn, accessed on 16/10/2024.
HUTT, L. S. (2018). The German Action Plan on Business and Human Rights: A step forward or just business as usual?
Justice, M. o. (2023). Preliminary assessment of Vietnam's legal framework on responsible business practices.
Koos, S. (2022). The German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act 2021 and its impact on globally operating German companies.
M Krajewski, K. T. (2021). Mandatory human rights due diligence in Germany and Norway: Stepping, or striding, in the same direction? . Cambridge University Press.
Macdonald, K. (2022). Obstacles to implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in Southeast Asia.
Mantouvalou, V. (2018). The UK Modern Slavery Act 2015: Three Years On.
Mercado, B. N. (2021). The Scope of the National Action Plans on Human Rights and Business Implemented in the Americas in 2020. Homa Publica, 5, 1.
Minh, H. C. (2011). Ho Chi Minh: Complete Works . Hanoi: National Political Publishing House – Truth, Vol. 1.
National Action Plans, UK. (n.d.).
Nations, U. (1994). Human Rights: Questions and Answers. Geneva, p.4.
Nguyen Dang Dung, V. C. (2009). Textbook on Human Rights Theory and Law. National University of Hanoi: National Political Publishing House, 23.
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan, D. P. (2018). The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: National Action Plans Towards Corporate Responsibility. Nationally Accredited Journal, Volume 4 Issue 2, 123.
Principle 10. (n.d.).
Principle 3a. (n.d.).
Principle 3b. (n.d.).
Principle 4. (n.d.).
Principle 5. (n.d.).
Principle 6. (n.d.).
Principle 6. (n.d.).
Principle 7. (n.d.).
Ramasastry, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility Versus Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Gap Between Responsibility and Accountability. University of Washington School of Law, UW Law Digital Commons.
Rights, A. N. (2006). International Service for Human Rights and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Rights, U. n. (2012). The corporate responsibility to respect human rights.
Rights, U. n. (2024). Access to remedy in cases of business–related human rights issues.
Robyn Mudie, A. A. (2022). Enhancing the responsibility to respect human rights in business in Vietnam. Retrieved from Business Forum Magazine: http://vccinghean.com.vn/doanh-nhan-doanh-nghiep/news/nang-cao-trach-nhiem-ton-trong-quyen-con-nguoi-trong-kinh-doanh-tai-viet-nam.html, truy cập ngày 14/10/2024.
Ruggie, J. (2008). Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights. Spring Publishing House, 198.
Ruggie, J. (2020). The Social Construction of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Research Handbook on Human Rights and Business.
Russell, J. (2012). Human Rights: The Universal Declaration vs The Cairo Declaration. Retrieved from Amnesty International: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk, accessed on 13/10/2024
Schrempf-Stirling, J. V. (2022). Human Rights: A Promising Perspective for Business & Society. Business & Society, 61(5), 1282–1321.
Secretariat, S.-S. (2016). An Introduction to Human Rights in Southeast Asia (vol. 2). Strengthening Human Rights and Peace Research and Education in ASEAN/Southeast Asia (SHAPE-SEA).
Tai, F.-M. a.-H. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility. Business, 117.
Tamvada, M. (2023). Synthesizing Synergies Between CSR and BHR for Corporate Accountability: An Integrated Approach. Spring Publishing House, 2.
Thailand National Action Plan. (n.d.).
Tu, D. C. (2022). ASEAN in the strategic competition of major powers in Southeast Asia in the early 21st century. Communist Magazine, https://www.tapchicongsan.org.vn/tin-binh-luan/-/asset_publisher/DLIYi5AJyFzY/content/asean-trong-canh-tranh-chien-luoc-nuoc-lon-tai-khu-vuc, truy cập ngày 16/10/2024.
UNHRC was established by Resolution 60/251 of April 3, 2006, of the UNGA to replace the UNCHR. (n.d.).
Vietnam Human Rights Report 2021. (n.d.).
Vives, J. (2013). Perceptions of Justice and the Human Rights Protect, Respect, and Remedy Framework. Journal of Business Ethics. Springer.
Wagner, W. (2014). International Relations Theories and Human Rights. In A. Mihr & M. Gibney (Eds). The SAGE Handbook of Human Rights, 105-122.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v12i3.42267 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
