Settlement of Criminal Cases through Integration Customary Law Values Angkon Muakhi in Lampung Province

Zainudin Hasan, Erna Dewi, Ahmad Irzal Fardiansyah, Refly Setiawan, Abdurrahman Abdurrahman

Abstract


The current Indonesian criminal law, although it has used the restorative justice method, has not been able to resolve the core of the problem and has not restored balance in society, so the settlement of criminal acts is not complete to the community, the victim and the victim's family. The importance of criminal law policies for the settlement of criminal cases through the integration of Angkon Muakhi law is to realise justice, benefit, balance, and kinship in criminal law enforcement. This research method uses the combined theory paradigm and mixed legal system to generate new ideas in settling criminal cases. This research is normative juridical and empirical juridical research with a socio-legal approach. In-depth interviews were carried out in primary data collection; sources were determined by the snowball method, while secondary data collection was carried out using a literature study. The findings of this study indicate that the enforcement of criminal law at this time still does not involve the community. There are still the rights of victims' families and communities that have not been restored; even though restorative justice has been resolved, it still leaves disputes, seeds of conflict and grudges both from the victim, the victim's family and the surrounding community. Prison sentences are still prioritised in light cases and negligence, both in the investigation process, prosecutors' demands, and the judge's decision. The importance of resolving criminal cases through integrating the customary law values of Angkon Muakhi, which can resolve cases, conflicts, hostilities and disputes between perpetrators, victims and the community.


Keywords


Settlement; Criminal cases; Integration; Customary Law Values; angkon muakhi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali A. (2008). Menguak Tabir Hukum. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hart H.L.A. (1959). Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment. Journals JSTOR. Volume 6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544619

Haprida et al., (2022). Imprisonment as a Criminal Sanction against Corporations in Forestry Crimes: How Is It Possible?. Hasanuddin Law Review 8. no. 3: 164. http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i2.3187

Ilyas A., and Hamzah. (2022). Administrative Land Conflicts and Reforming State Owned Enterprises in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review 8, no. 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i2.2362

Rahardjo S. (1982). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Alumni. Sinar Grafika.

Rato D. (2014). Hukum Adat di Indonesia Suatu Pengantar. Laksbang Justitia Surabaya.

Rudy et al., (2022). Implementation of Civil Rights against Vulnerable Groups in the Legal and Constitutional System in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review 8. no. 3: 299. http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i3.4229

Sambas N., and Mahmud A. (2019). Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan Asas-asas dalam KUHP. Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Soekanto S., and Mamudji S. (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Utomo L. (2016). Hukum Adat. Raja grafindo Persada Depok.

Wignyosoebroto S. (2002). Hukum : Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Elsa Hima: Jakarta.

Zuhri M.F. (2019). Forgiveness of Judges: Local Wisdom in the Concept of National Criminal Law. Journal Walisongo Law Review (Walrev). Vol 1 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2019.1.1.4757




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v12i1.38837 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Free counters!

View My Stats

Creative Commons License 
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International