Legal Confıscatıon as a Property Rıght Issue in Turkey
Abstract
Zoning plans are drawn and written texts prepared as a result of planning activities according to the characteristics of the region in order to meet the social, cultural, human and economic needs of a settlement and to show a safer and more regular development of the place. The property rights of individuals can be restricted by means of the plans prepared by the administration to create livable, orderly and modern living spaces. While the zoning plans are being prepared, the immovables allocated for public services should first be selected from public lands and if these immovables are not sufficient for the places to be allocated to the public service areas, the immovables subject to private property should be allocated to the public service and these areas should be expropriated by the administrations to be allocated on their behalf. The Zoning Law No. 3194 in Turkey is the basic regulation of the zoning law. In the Zoning Law, there is a regulation that the parcels allocated to public services in the zoning plans will be expropriated within five years. However, if the expropriation of the immovables is not completed within the time specified in the legal regulation, the owner who is deprived of his right to dispose of the immovable, is unfairly burdened with a heavy burden. The concept of "legal confiscation" emerges when the property right of the owner of the immovable is restricted for many years only by allocating privately owned immovables to public space in the zoning plans without any actual intervention by the administration. Since the administrations responsible for expropriation mostly avoid this obligation, the procedures established by the administration for planning constitute a disproportionate and unfair intervention in the property rights of the immovable owners. In this study, the definition of the concept of legal confiscation in Turkey, its elements, the remedies for ending the interference with the right to property will be explained, the procedures and principles to be considered during the judgement will be explained by giving examples from the judicial case-law and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, and solution proposals will be presented.
Keywords: Legal Confiscation; Construction Plan; Property; Contravention
Tuntutan Hukum sebagai Permasalah Hak Properti di Turki
Abstrak.
Undang-undang Zonasi No. 3194 di Turki adalah peraturan dasar dari undang-undang zonasi. Dalam UU Zonasi, ada aturan bahwa persil yang dialokasikan untuk layanan publik dalam rencana zonasi akan diambil alih dalam waktu lima tahun. Akan tetapi, jika pengambilalihan barang-barang tidak bergerak itu tidak selesai dalam waktu yang ditentukan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, maka pemilik yang dirampas haknya untuk membuang barang-barang tidak bergerak itu, dibebani secara tidak adil dengan beban yang berat. Konsep "sita hukum" muncul ketika hak milik pemilik barang tidak bergerak dibatasi selama bertahun-tahun hanya dengan mengalokasikan barang-barang milik pribadi ke ruang publik dalam rencana zonasi tanpa intervensi nyata dari pemerintah. Karena sebagian besar administrasi yang bertanggung jawab atas pengambilalihan menghindari kewajiban ini, prosedur yang ditetapkan oleh administrasi untuk perencanaan merupakan intervensi yang tidak proporsional dan tidak adil dalam hak milik pemilik tak bergerak. Dalam penelitian ini akan dijelaskan pengertian dari konsep sita hukum di Turki, unsur-unsurnya, upaya penyelesaian untuk mengakhiri campur tangan terhadap hak milik akan dijelaskan, prosedur dan prinsip-prinsip yang harus dipertimbangkan selama penilaian akan dijelaskan dengan memberikan contoh-contoh dari kasus hukum peradilan dan keputusan Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia Eropa, dan proposal solusi akan disajikan.
Kata Kunci: Penyitaan Hukum; Rencana Pembangunan; Properti; Kontravensi
Юридическая конфискация как проблема права собственности в Турции
Абстрактный.
Закон о зонировании № 3194 в Турции является основным постановлением закона о зонировании. В Законе о зонировании есть положение, согласно которому участки, выделенные для общественных услуг в планах зонирования, будут экспроприированы в течение пяти лет. Однако, если отчуждение недвижимой вещи не завершено в сроки, указанные в правовом регулировании, на собственника, лишенного права распоряжаться недвижимой вещью, несправедливо возлагается тяжелое бремя. Понятие «юридическая конфискация» возникает, когда право собственности владельца недвижимой вещи ограничивается в течение многих лет только путем отнесения частной недвижимой собственности к общественным местам в планах зонирования без какого-либо фактического вмешательства со стороны администрации. Поскольку администрации, ответственные за экспроприацию, в большинстве случаев избегают этого обязательства, процедуры, установленные администрацией для планирования, представляют собой несоразмерное и несправедливое вмешательство в имущественные права владельцев недвижимого имущества. В этом исследовании будет объяснено определение концепции правовой конфискации в Турции, ее элементы, средства правовой защиты для прекращения вмешательства в право собственности, а также будут объяснены процедуры и принципы, которые должны быть рассмотрены в ходе судебного решения, с помощью примеров из будет представлена судебная практика и решения Европейского суда по правам человека, а также предложения по их решениям.
Ключевые слова: Конфискация; План Строительства; Собственность; Правонарушение
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
th Chamber of the Council of State 02.11.2020 numbered E:2017/492, K:2020/10110; 13.10.2020 numbered E:2019/14241, K:2020/9227.
th Chamber of the Council of State 07.05.2019 numbered E:2019/1577, K:2019/3691.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 05.03.2020 numbered E:2019/1169 K:2020/3269.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 10.02.2016 numbered E:2014/8728 ve K:2016/484.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 12.12.2019 numbered E:2019/8086, K:209/14161.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 02.03.2020 numbered E:2015/8765, K:2020/2931.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 03.11.2016 numbered E:2016/2332, K:2016/6760.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 04.04.2016 numbered E:2015/7566, K:2016/1441.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 05.03.2020 numbered E:2019/1169 K:2020/3269.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 07.09.2020 numbered E:2018/1626, K:2020/7200;
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 10.02.2016 numbered E:2015/9088, K:2016/486;
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 12.12.2017 numbered E:2017/3161 K:2017/10690.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 13.10.2016 numbered, 2015/8054, K:2016/5585.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 13.10.2020 numbered E:2016/13688, K:2020/9230.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 13.10.2020 E:2016/6170 K:2020/9222.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 14.03.2017 numbered E:2016/3471 ve K:2017/1825.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 17/12/2019 numbered E:2018/1915, K:2019/14260.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 21.01.2014 numbered E:2012/2240 ve K:2014/213.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 31.10.2017 numbered E:2016/8707, K:2017/8429.
th Chamber of the Council of State Its decision dated 31.10.2017 numbered E:2016/8707, K:2017/8429.
th Chamber of the Council of State numbered E. 2012/3451, K. 2015/137, T. 23.1.2015, Uyap (09.12.2020).
th Chamber of the Council of StateIts decision dated 17.04.2013 numbered, E:2011/8152 ve K:2013/2702.
Akyılmaz, B., Sezginer, M. & Kaya, C. (2019). Turkish law of dministration. Ankara, Turkey: Savaş Publishing House.
Aydın Ö. (2018). Property Rights in Areas to be Reserved for Public Use in Zoning Plans A Study on Disputes, Master Thesis, Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul, 2018.
Case of Stan Greek Refineries Dökmeci v. Turkey Application no. 74155/14
Court of Conflict E:2020/294 K:2020/641 Uyap.gov.tr (accessed 11.12.2020).
Çolak, N.İ. (2014). Zoning Law, 2nd Edition, On İki Levha Publication, İstanbul, 2014.
Demirkol, S. (2001). “The Case of Administrative Actions in Administrative Law”, Sayıştay Journal, Ankara, Ocak-Mart, 2001, s.40.
DİDDGK 27.03.1998 day, M:1996/768, F:1998/164,.
DİDDGK's decision dated 24.05.2012, numbered M:2007/2255 and K:2012/801
DİDDGK's decision numbered 25.11.2013 T. M:2010/342 and K:2013/4255.
DİDDK E:2005/2154, K:2008/1839, T. 23.10.2008; E:2014/1615, K:2014/2763, T. 23.06.2014.
Ergen, C. (2006). Land and Land Arrangements, 2nd Edition, Seçkin Publishing, Ankara, 2006.
Erol, Ö. F. (2013). “ Confiscation Without Expropriation Through Zoning Plan in Judicial Decisions”, Refereed Winner Law Journal, 2013, Volume 9.
Firdes Serim and others, B. No: 2017/20808, 18/4/2019, Accessed date (08.12.2020).
Gözler, K. Law of Administration, Volume 2, 2nd Edition, Ekin Publishing House, Bursa, 2009.
Gözübüyük, A.Ş. (2002). Introduction to Law, 16. Bası, Turhan Publication, Ankara.
Gülan, A. (1989). Updated Meaning of the Declaration of 1789, Journal of Administrative Law and Sciences, Volume, 10, ss.125-142.
Gülan, A. (2000). “Transfer of Goods Between Administrations – Article 30 of the Expropriation Law No. 2942 Thoughts on”, Gift in Memory of Prof. Dr M. Kemal Oguzman, Editor: Nami Barlas, Abuzer Kendigelen, Suat Sarı, Beta Publishing Distribution, İstanbul, 2000,s.353-364.
Gülan, A. (2011). Thoughts on the Role of Law in Aggravating Urbanism Problems, Journal of Sociology (İstanbul Üniversity), Volume, 22, ss.295-303.
İlgezdi, A.R. (2015). Legal Confiscation, Seçkin Publication, Ankara, 2015.
Kalabalık, H. (2017). Zoning Law Courses, Seçkin Publishing House, Ankara.
Kaplan, G. “Compensation Due to Confiscation Without Expropriation According to New Legal Regulations Principles and Procedures to which His Right is Subject”, TBB Journal, S.99, 2012.
Karaca, E. (2018). “Related Legislation of Land and Land Arrangement, One of the Implementation Methods of Zoning PlanInvestigation in the Framework”, Journal of the Court of Appeals, Volume 11, Ankara, 2018, ss. 217-261.
Metin Sezer et al. Turkey AHİM dated 23/09/2014 and Application No: 43545/09
Orta, E. (2005). Plan Hierarchy and Conflict of Plans in Zoning Law, Master Thesis, İstanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul, 2005, s. 21.
Sancakdar, O. (2014). Administrative Law, 3rd Edition, Seçkin Publishing House, Ankara.
Semin, Y. (2018). Legal Confiscation in Zoning Law, (Unpublished Master Thesis), Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
Stran ve Stratis Andreadis/Yunanistan, 9 Aralık 1994, § 82, seri A No. 301-B), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/tur#{%22fulltext%22:[%22el%20atma%20faiz%20m%C3%BClkiyet%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-174029%22]}(11.12.2020).
Supreme Court HGK 15.12.2010 T. 2010/5–662 E. ve 2010/651 K. sayılı kararı www.tbb.gov.tr › storage › userfiles ›yargi_kararlari(11.12.2020)
Tan, T. (2018). Law of Administration. Ankara, Turkey, Turhan Publication.
The decision of the Constitutional Court dated 15/11/2018, Application Number: 2016/37323uyap.gov.tr(erişimtarihi 12.12.2020).
The decision of the Constitutional Court dated 15/11/2018, Application Number: 2016/37323 Mesutoğlu-Türkiye/2008 https://www.kararara.com/aihm/turkce2/aihm11183.htm.
The decision of the Constitutional Court dated 28.03.2018 and numbered E:2016/196, K:2018/34
The decision of the Constitutional Court, dated 28.03.2018, numbered E:2016/196, K:2018/34, AYM E. 2015/55, K. 2016/45, T. 26.05.2016, R.G. 28.06.2016-29756;
The decision of the Court of Conflict dated 24.04.2019 and numbered E:2019/142 K:2019/258.
Yasin M. (2015). Confirmation In Administrative Trial Procedure, Istanbul, Turkey, On İki Levha Publication.
Yasin, M. & Şahin, C. (2015), Urbanization Law, On İki Levha Publication. Yaşar, H.N. (2008). Zoning Law, Filiz Publishing House, İstanbul, 2008, s.8-9.
Yıldırım, T., Yasin M., Kaman, N. & Özdemir, E. (2009). Law of Administration. lstanbul, Turkey, On İki Levha Publication.
Ziya Çevik v. Turkey case,B.N. 19145/08, K.T. 21.06.2011, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001105208( accessed date 08.12.2020)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i3.23397 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/citahukum/index