Foreign Experience of Legal Support Privatization and the Possibility of its Use in Ukraine

Roman Victorovich Myroniuk, Anatolii Matviichuk, Olena Hrabylnikova, Olesia Marchenko

Abstract


Successful examples of legal support privatization in a number of developed foreign countries are analyzed. In particular, the main attention was paid to the analysis of the experience of legal support privatization in developed and democratic countries of North America and Western Europe. The possibility and peculiarity of the procedure of introduction of specific forms and methods of legal support of the processes related to privatization in Ukraine are established. It is stated that privatization is one of the most significant phenomena both in the economy of a particular state and in society as a whole. It is noted that the proper legal enforcement and support of all privatization-related processes determine whether the economic development and prosperity of the state will take place, or, conversely, it will decline and suffer significant losses. It is noted that in connection with the gradual rapprochement of Ukraine with European states and their standards, the problem of inventing the most appropriate and relevant privatization of certain state or municipal enterprises is becoming more acute. At the same time, researchers prefer to conduct a qualitative analysis of the processes of privatization of state property that has taken place in the past in more detail, based on certain newly discovered facts. Among other things, it is considered necessary to check whether the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens, as well as the state, have been violated during the privatization process.

Keywords: Privatization Legal Support; Implementation; Effective Activity; Qualitative Regulation; Research of Processes and Phenomena

Pengalaman Asing Dalam Privatisasi Dukungan Hukum dan Peluang Penerapannya di Ukraina 

Abstrak

Contoh sukses privatisasi dukungan hukum di sejumlah negara maju asing dianalisis. Secara khusus, perhatian utama diberikan pada analisis pengalaman privatisasi dukungan hukum di negara-negara maju dan demokratis di Amerika Utara dan Eropa Barat. Kemungkinan dan kekhasan prosedur pengenalan bentuk khusus dan metode dukungan hukum dari proses yang terkait dengan privatisasi di Ukraina ditetapkan. Disebutkan bahwa privatisasi adalah salah satu fenomena paling signifikan baik dalam perekonomian suatu negara tertentu maupun dalam masyarakat secara keseluruhan. Penegakan hukum yang tepat dan dukungan dari semua proses terkait privatisasi menentukan apakah pembangunan ekonomi dan kemakmuran negara akan berlangsung, atau sebaliknya, akan menurun dan menderita kerugian yang signifikan. Sehubungan dengan pemulihan hubungan Ukraina secara bertahap dengan negara-negara Eropa dan standar mereka, masalah menciptakan privatisasi yang paling tepat dan relevan dari perusahaan negara bagian atau kota tertentu menjadi lebih akut. Pada saat yang sama, peneliti lebih memilih untuk melakukan analisis kualitatif terhadap proses privatisasi barang milik negara yang telah terjadi di masa lalu secara lebih rinci, berdasarkan fakta-fakta tertentu yang baru ditemukan. Antara lain, dipandang perlu untuk memeriksa apakah hak, kebebasan, dan kepentingan sah warga negara, serta negara, telah dilanggar selama proses privatisasi.

Kata Kunci: Dukungan Hukum Privatisasi; Pelaksanaan; Kegiatan Efektif; Regulasi Kualitatif; Penelitian Proses dan Fenomena 

Зарубежный опыт правового обеспечения приватизации и возможность его использования в Украине

Аннотация

Проанализированы успешные примеры правового обеспечения приватизации в ряде развитых зарубежных стран. В частности, основное внимание было уделено анализу опыта правового обеспечения приватизации в развитых и демократических странах Северной Америки и Западной Европы. Установлены особенность процедуры введения конкретных форм и методов правового обеспечения процессов, связанных с приватизацией в Украине. Констатировано, что приватизация является одной из наиболее значимых явлений как в экономике конкретного государства, так и в обществе в целом. От надлежащего правового обеспечения и сопровождения всех связанных с приватизацией процессов зависит будет ли происходить экономическое развитие и процветание государства, или же наоборот она испытывает упадок и получит существенные убытки. В связи с постепенным приближением Украины к европейским государствам и их стандартов, все более остро встает проблема изобретение наиболее уместного и актуального проведения приватизации определенных государственных или коммунальных предприятий. Вместе с тем, исследователи предпочитают более детализировано, опираясь на определенные вновь открывшиеся факты, провести качественный анализ тех процессов приватизации государственной собственности, которые произошли в прошлом. Среди прочего, признается необходимым проверить, не были ли нарушены при проведении приватизации права, свободы и законные интересы граждан, а также интересы государства.

Ключевые слова: приватизация, правовое обеспечение, эффективная деятельность, качественная регламентация, исследования процессов и явлений


Keywords


Privatization Legal Support; Implementation; Effective Activity; Qualitative Regulation; Research of Processes and Phenomena

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Bachiller, P. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of privatization on firm performance. Management Decision, 55(1), 178–202. Retrieved from https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/63428/files/texto_completo.pdf

Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Saffar, W. (2016). National culture and privatization: The relationship between collectivism and residual state ownership. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(2), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.38

Breen, M., & Doyle, D. (2013). The determinants of privatization: A comparative analysis of developing countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.741439

Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. (2014). State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0069

Estrin, S., & Pelletier, A. (2018). Privatization in Developing Countries: What Are the Lessons of Recent Experience? The World Bank Research Observer, 33(1), 65–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx007

Fainshmidt, S., Judge, W.Q., Aguilera, R.V., & Smith, A. (2016). Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries. Journal of World Business, 53, 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.05.003

Ford, J., & Plimmer, G. (2018). Returning the UK’s privatized services to the public. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/90c0f8e8-17fd-11e8-9e9c-25c814761640

Greve, H. R., & Zhang, C. M. (2016). Institutional Logics and Power Sources: Merger and Acquisition Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 671–694. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0698

Jupe, R., & Funnell, W. (2015). Neoliberalism, consultants and the privatization of public policy formulation: The case of Britain’s rail industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 29, 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.02.001

Katsalap, L. S. (2020). Genesis of State Social Policy of Ukraine: Administrative and Legal Aspect. Law and Safety, 76(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2020.1.08

Kotowski, J., & Zagoździńska, I. (2016). Privatization vs. productivity in Poland. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sdd/productivity-stats/37528505.pdf

Morris, D. (September, 2018). Is Britain’s long love affair with privatization ending in divorce? Retrieved from https://ilsr.org/is-britains-long-love-affair-with-privatization-ending-in-divorce/

Parker, D. (2004). The UK’s privatization experiment: he Passage of Time Permits a Sober Assessment. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=514224

Ravasi, D. (2021). Privatization: Implications of a Shift from State to Private Ownership. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0149206320988356

Sachs, J., & Lipton, D. (1990). Privatization in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,2, 293–341.

Sasse, T., & Davies, N. (2020). Outsourcing and privatization. Institute for Government. Retrieved from https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/government-outsourcing-reform-WEB.pdf

Snisarenko, L. Y. (2017). Legal support of privatization of objects with land plots: problems and prospects. Electronic scientific journal «Derzhavne upravlinnya: udoskonalennya ta rozvytok», 3. Retrieved from http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1046.

Zavalnyi, M. V. (2019). National, International and Legal Mechanisms of Control over the Activity of Non-Government Security Entities. Law and Safety, 73(2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2019.2.04




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i3.22611 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/citahukum/index

Free counters!

View My Stats

Creative Commons License 
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International