Jus Cogens: Problem of the Role in Treaty Interpretation
Abstract
Due to their specific legal nature, the jus cogens rules occupy a special place and have conceptual significance in international law system in the vein that their non-compliance may, in fact, sabotage foundations of the international legal system based on states consent. Since the entry into force of the VCLT, jus cogens concept in international law has moved closer to international legal practice. A paradoxical situation exists - jus cogens concept in international law is generally accepted, there is also a normatively established definition of such a rule, but its specific framework and content remain unclear. The ICJ has repeatedly addressed the issue of jus cogens norms, but a detailed concept on jus cogens has not been formed. It is analyzed that the problem of establishing jus cogens is difficult to solve in abstractio. The reason lies not only in the absence of a single official list of norms jus cogens – the criteria for including norms in such a list are not defined. Opinions of representatives of the doctrine and the international judiciary on this issue differ significantly. Addressing the problem of the role and significance of jus cogens, general international law imperative rules, for the observance and interpretation of treaties, it should be noted that treaties are to be interpreted in a format compatible with the imperative norms. The considerations presented in the research indicate a special, if not decisive, role in the observance of jus cogens in treaties interpretation.
Keywords: International Law; VCLT; Treaties; Imperative Rules
Jus Cogens: Masalah Peran dalam Interpretasi Perjanjian
Abstrak
Aturan Jus Cogens menempati tempat khusus dan memiliki makna konseptual dalam sistem hukum internasional dikarenakan sifat hukumnya yang spesifik, selain karena ketidakpatuhannya dapat menyabot fondasi sistem hukum internasional berdasarkan persetujuan negara. Sejak berlakunya VCLT, konsep Jus Cogens dalam hukum internasional semakin mendekati praktik hukum internasional. Situasi paradoks terjadi - konsep Jus Cogens dalam hukum internasional diterima secara umum. Ada juga definisi yang ditetapkan secara normatif dari aturan semacam itu, tetapi kerangka kerja dan isinya yang spesifik masih belum jelas. ICJ telah berulang kali membahas masalah norma Jus Cogens, tetapi konsep rinci tentang Jus Cogens belum terbentuk. Dianalisis bahwa masalah pembentukan Jus Cogens sulit dipecahkan secara abstrak. Alasannya tidak hanya terletak pada tidak adanya satu daftar resmi norma Jus Cogens – kriteria untuk memasukkan norma dalam daftar tersebut tidak didefinisikan. Pendapat perwakilan doktrin dan peradilan internasional tentang masalah ini berbeda secara signifikan. Mengatasi masalah peran dan pentingnya Jus Cogens, aturan umum hukum internasional imperatif, untuk ketaatan dan interpretasi perjanjian. Perlu dicatat bahwa perjanjian harus ditafsirkan dalam format yang kompatibel dengan norma-norma imperatif. Pertimbangan yang disajikan dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan peran khusus, jika tidak menentukan, dalam ketaatan Jus Cogens dalam interpretasi perjanjian.
Kata kunci: Hukum Internasional; VCLT; Perjanjian; Aturan Imperatif
Jus Cogens: Проблема Роли В Толковании Договора
Aннотация
Нормы jus cogens вследствие своей специфической правовой природы занимают особое место, имеют концептуальное значение в системе международного права в том смысле, что их несоблюдение может фактически подорвать основы международной правовой системы, которая опирается на согласие государств. Со времени своего включения в Венскую конвенцию о праве международных договоров 1969 г., концепция международного права jus cogens подошла к международной юридической практике. Доказано, что имеет место парадокс – концепция jus cogens в международном праве общепринятая, также существует нормативно-закрепленное понятие такой нормы, при этом ее рамки и содержание остаются неточными. МС ООН неоднократно касался проблематики норм jus cogens, однако не дал системного видения данного вопроса. Проблему определения jus cogens решить in abstracto сложно. Причина не только в отсутствии единого официального перечня норм jus cogens – не определены критерии включения норм в такой перечень. Мнения представителей доктрины и международного судейского корпуса по этому поводу существенно различаются. Приведенные в исследовании соображения свидетельствуют об особой, если не решающей, роли jus cogens в процессе интерпретации международных договоров.
Ключевые слова: Jus cogens, международное право, интерпретация международных договоров, ВКПМД
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bossuyt, M., & Wouters, J., (2005). Grondlijnen van intemationaal recht. Antwerpen: Intersentia.
Butkevych, O. B. (2006). Formation of jus cogens norms in pre-classical international law. Bulletin of the Academy of Legal Sciences. 4, 207–218.
Byers, M. (1997). Conceptualising the Relationship between jus cogens and erga omnes Rules. Nordic Journal of International Law. 66 (2), 211–239.
Criddle, E. J., Fox-Decent, E. (2009). A Fiduciary Theory of jus cogens. Yale Journal of International Law. 34 (2). 1. 43–447. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1750-0206.2004.tb00510.x
Dörr, O., Schmalenbach, K. (eds.). (2018). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, LVIII.
European Court of Human Rights. (21 November 2001). Case of Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom (Applicatiom no. 35763/97). Judgment. Strasbourg. Paras 34, 55,61.
Grushko M. V. (2018). War crimes as international crimes jus cogens military crimes as an international jus cogens. Actual problems of domestic jurisprudence. 1, 241–244.
ICJ Reports. (13 September 1993). Separate opinion of Judge Lauterpacht. Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro). Para 100.
ICJ Reports. Advisory Opinion. (22 juli 2010). Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo. Para 81.
ICJ Reports. Judgment (20 Juli 2012). Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal). Para 99.
ICJ Reports. Judgment (27 June 1986). Case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). Merits. Para 190.
ICJ Reports. Judgment (3 February 2006). Case concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda). Jurisdiction of the Court and Admissibility of the Application 6, 32.
ICJ Reports. Judgment (3 February 2012). Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece Intervening), 92–95.
ICJ Reports. Separate opinion of Judge Elaraby. (9 Juli 2004). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/105/105-20041215-JUD-01-01-EN.pdf
Kolb, R. (2015). Peremptory International Law – jus cogens: A General Inventory. Oxford. Portland: Hart Publisher.
Lauterpach, H. (1958). The development of International Law by the International Court. London: Stevens.
Linderfalk, U. (2011). The Creation of Jus Cogens – Making Sense of Article 53 of the Vienna Convention. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht. 71, 359–378.
Mosler, H. (1974). International Society as a Legal Community. Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International de La Haye. 140 (1), 11–14.
Multilateral Vienna Convention on the law of treaties (with annex). Concluded at Vienna on 23 May 1969.
Orakhelashvili A. (2006) Peremptory Norms in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
United Nation. (1951). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nation on 9 December 1948. No. 1021 / Treaty Series.
United Nations. (2018). General Assembly. Official Records. Seventy-third session. Report of the International Law Commission. Seventy Session (30 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2018). Supplement No. 10 (A/73/10). New York.
United Nations. General Assembly. Seventy-third session. Official reports. (19 November 2018). 18-17950X (R). Sixth Committee Summary Report of the 25th Meeting (New York) Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/ga/sixth/73/ilc.shtml
Weatherall, Т. (2015). Jus Сogens: International Law and Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zadorozhniy, O.V. (2015). Normative protection of the principle of conscientious fulfillment of international obligations in modern international law. Law and society. 4. (4.) 12–21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i2.22235 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/citahukum/index