Systemic Reformulation of Labour Arrangements Between Demand and Pressure Concerning Income towards Welfare in Indonesia
Abstract
Abstracts
The abstract of this article authors several points, among others: Firstly, Purpose of Article; to analyze labor regulation concerning income provision towards welfare for employers in Indonesia. Secondly, Scope of Work; that the legal implementation focuses on Indonesian labor law arrangements, and then concerning pressures relevant to income as an international standard for laborers, and demand for wage acceptance as a facility for labor welfare, and also labor law dispute settlement in the Indonesian welfare system. Thirdly, Legal Methodology; refers to qualitative research with secondary materials from normative and empirical sources, also by conducting legal comparison from other countries outside of Indonesia. Fourthly, Result in Summary; on the systemic implementation of Indonesian labor regulation as stipulated in a written constitution, that ”Each citizen shall reserve the rights for adequate employment and income based on sustainable standards (Article 27 paragraph (2), 1945 Indonesian Constitution). The income pressure for International labor standards via ILO has created a standard system to protect the rights of laborers binding themselves in an agreement, based on ILO Convention No.89 the Year 1949 which instigated the birth of Law Number 18 the Year 1956 concerning Ratification of ILO Convention No. 80 the Year 1957. Demands for income to be accepted as labor welfare has yet to reiterate the importance of wage component in applicable labor law (Law Number 13 the Year 2003 concerning Employment) since it allows Governor in each province to regulate the measurement of labor’s wage on annual basis. Similarly with labor trial pattern which only allows the Industrial Relations Court and not solely referring to labor arbitration institution as expected from ILO and WTO as international organizations. Fifthly, Conclusion; that systemic reformulation of labor regulation to achieve welfare in Indonesia still requires the participation or internal demand from laborers and pressure from international labor institutions.
Keywords: Income Regulation, Indonesian Labour Welfare.
Reformulasi Sistemik Pengaturan Ketenagakerjaan Antara Permintaan dan Tekanan Terkait Pendapatan untuk Kesejahteraan di Indonesia
Abstrak
Tujuan Penulisan artikel ini untuk menganalisis pengaturan perburuhan dalam pemberian penghasilan menuju kesejahteraan oleh pengusaha di Indonesia. Sedang ruang Lingkupnya bahwa pelaksanaan hukum pengaturan hukum perburuhan Indonesia, kemudian terhadap tekanan mengenai penghasilan dari standar buruh Internasional, dan tuntutan penerimaan penghasilan sebagai fasilitas kesejahteraan buruh, juga sistem penyelesaian hukum perburuhan dalam sistem kesejahteraan di Indonesia. Metode Penelitian digunakan adalah menggunakan cara penelitian kualitatif dengan bahan sekunder dari bahan hukum normatif dan empiris, juga melakukan perbandingan hukum dari luar Indonesia. Hasilnya bahwa terhadap penerapan sistemik pengaturan perburuhan Indonesia yang telah dijabarkan dalam konstitusi tertulis menekankan bahwa” tiap-tiap warga negara berhak atas pekerjaan dan penghidupan yang layak bagi kemanusiaan” (Pasal 27 ayat (2) UUD 1945). Tekanan penghasilan dari standar buruh Internasional melalui ILO telah menciptakan suatu sistem standar melindungi hak buruh mengikatkan diri di dalam perjanjian yang konvensi ILO No.89 Tahun 1949 mengenai lahir UU No.18 Tahun 1956 tentang Persetujuan Konvensi ILO No.80 Tahun 1957. Tuntutan penerimaan penghasilan sebagai kesejahteraan buruh belum memberikan penegasan komponen upah dalam perundang buruh berlaku (UU No.13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan) karena memberikan pada setiap pemerintahan Gubernur setiap provinsi untuk mengatur besar-kecil pengupahan buruh untuk setiap tahunnya.
Kata Kunci: Pengaturan Penghasilan, Kesejahteraan Buruh Indonesia.
Системное изменение условий труда между спросом и давлением в отношении доходов для обеспечения благосостояния в Индонезии
Аннотация
Цель исследования: проанализировать трудовые условия при предоставлении дохода для обеспечения благосостояния предпринимателями в Индонезии. Предмет исследования: выполнение и условие трудового законодательства Индонезии, затем давление на доход со стороны международных трудовых стандартов и требования о принятии дохода в качестве объекта социальной сферы для рабочих, и также системы урегулирования трудового законодательства в системе социального обеспечения в Индонезии. Используемые методы исследования: качественный метод исследования с использованием вторичных материалов из нормативных и эмпирических правовых материалов, а также в проведении юридических сравнений за пределами Индонезии. Результаты исследования: применение индонезийских трудовых норм, описанных в писаной конституции, подчеркивают, что « каждый гражданин имеет право на труд и достойную жизнь для человечества» (пункт (2) статьи 27 Конституции 1945 года). Давление на доходы со стороны международных трудовых стандартов через МОТ привело к созданию стандартной системы защиты прав трудящихся в соответствии с Конвенцией МОТ № 89 от 1949 года о принятии Закона № 18 от 1956 года об Утверждении Конвенции МОТ № 80 от 1957 года. Что касается благосостояния рабочих, он не подтвердил компонент заработной платы в применимом трудовом законодательстве (Закон № 13 от 2003 года о рабочей силе), поскольку он даёт правительству каждого губернатора каждой провинции право регулировать сумму заработной платы на каждый год. Точно так же модель трудового правосудия допускает только PPHI (Разрешение Производственных Споров), а не единственное учреждение арбитражного урегулирования трудовых конфликтов, как ожидается от мировых учреждений МОТ и ВТО.
Ключевые слова: Управление доходами, Благосостояние индонезийских рабочих.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aaron, B. (2007). Comparative Labor Law-Bridging the Past and The Future, 28 Comp. Lab. & Pol’y J. 377, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, Spring.
Arieff, S. (1986). Himpunan Undang-Undang Hukum Perburuhan di Indonesia. Surabaya: Pustaka Tinta Mas.
Arthurs, H.W. (2007). Compared to What The UCLA Comparative Labor Law Project and the Future of Comparative Labor Law, 28 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol’y J. 591, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, Spring.
Araki, T. (1994). “Special Section International Collequium on Labor Law: Models of Employee Representational Participation Part II, The Japanese Model of Employee Representational Participation”, Comparative Labor Law Journal, (Vol. 15: 143).
Araki, T. (2007). A Comparative Analysis of Security, Flexibility, and Decentralized Industrial Relations in Japan, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, Spring, 28 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol’y J. 443, Copyright @ Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal.
Anggotakan ISMN terdiri dari; YLKI, LBH Jakarata, ELSAM, INFID, LBH, APIK, YLKI dan PMK-HKBP Jakarta.
Anoraga, Pandji. Perusahaan Multinasional dan Penanaman Modal Asing (Pustaka Jaya)
Alston, P. (1993). “Labor Rights Provisions in US Trade Law: “Aggressive Unilateralism”, Human Rights Quarterly 15: 1-35 by The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Barbieri, C.T. (1996). “Women Laborers in Transition: The Potential Impact onf The NAFTA Labor Side Agreements on Women Laborers in Argentina and Chile”, Comparative Labor Law Journal, Vol. 17: 526.
Biagi, M. (1994). “Recession and The Labour Market: Training for Flexibilty-The Italian case in a Comparative Perspective”, Comparative Labor Law Jornal Vol 15.
Bin Md. H. Ahmad, M. (tth). The Textile and Garment Industry, (Pelanduk Publications) Vol. 116.
Brookes, B; Madden, P. (1995). The Globe-Trotting Sport-Shoe, London: Christian Aid, Vol. 18.
Ballon, R.J. (1988). Sistem Penggajian Jepang, penyunting B.N. Marbun, “Manajemen Jepang”. Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Presindo.
Bercusson, B. (1995). “The Conceptualization of European Labour Law”, Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 24 No. 1, March @ Industrial Law Society.
Blanchet, Didier. "Does an Agein Labour Force Call for Large Adjustments in Training or Wage Policies”, Labor Market in an Agein Europe, Cambridge University Press.
Carrizosa, A.S. (1988). "Standing Committee on Human Rights", Human Rights Organization, Ficial Bulletin, LXXI, Series BNI.
Covington, R.N; Kurt, H.D. (1995). Individual Employee Rights In A Nutshell. (St. Paul, Minn. West Publishing Co).
Covington, R.N; Kurt, H.D (1995). Individual Employee Rights In A Nutshell.
Departemen Tenaga Kerja RI. Pembaruan Sistem Upah, Editor Sasono, A dkk (1994). Jakarta: Cides.
Cunningham, W; Mercado, S.L. (1993). “The North American Free Trade Agreement: The Sale of U.S. Inudutry to The Lowest Bidder”, Hoefstra Labor Law Journal Vol 10 No 2 Spring.
Covington, R.N; Kurt H.D. (1995). Individual Employee Rights In A Nutshell,
Cerna, C.M. (1994).“University of Human Rights and Culture Diversity: Implementation of Human Rights in Different Socio-Cultural Contexts”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol.16 740-752 by The Johns Hopkins University Press).
Caire, G. (tth). “Labour Standars and International Trade” International Labour Standars and Economic Interdependence.
Cerna, C.M. (1994). “Universality of Human Rights and Cultural Diversity: Implementation of Human Rights in Different Socio-Cultural Contexts”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 16.
Chu, Y.H. (1989). “State Structure and Economic Adjusment of the East Asia Newly Industrializing Countries”, International Labor Organization Vol. 43. 4. Autumn by The World Peace Foundation and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Ewing, E.D. (1996). “Democratic Socialism and Labour Law”, Industrial Law Journal, Volume 24, June.
Erickson, C.L; Sarosh, K. (1994). “Labor Costs and The Social Dumping Debate in The Eupopean Union”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review Vol 48 No (1 October. (Cornel University).
Erickson, C.L; Daniel, J.B.M. (1996). “Labor Standar in International Trade Agreements: The Current Debate”, (December), Labor Law Journal, (International Trade Agreements).
Fraser, S.L.W.R. (1991). The Free Press a Division of Macmillan, Inc. New York, Maxwell Macmillan Canada Toronto, Maxwell Macmillan International New York, Oxford-Singapura-Sydney.
Fischel, D.R. (tth) “Labor Markets and Labor Law Compared with Capital Markets and Corporate Law”, Labor Law and The Employment Market.
FBA, (2007). Lord Wedderburn. Labour Law 2008: 40 Years on, 36 Indus. L.J. 397, Industrial Law Journal December.
FBA, (1998). "Deregulation and Labour Law in Britain and Western Europe". Hofstra Labor Law Journal, (Vol. No: 1)
Fossum, J.A. (1982). "Labor Relation; Development, Structure, Process”, Bargaining Theory and Structure, Business Publications, Inc.
Groding, J. dalam Ian, H, (1993). “The Constitutionalization of Employment Rights: A Comparative View”, Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, (Vol. 14: 113).
Glick, C.A. (1989). “Labor-Manajemen Cooperative Programs: Do They Foster or Frustrate National Labor Policy”, Hofstra Labor Law Journal, (Vol. 7: 1).
Hansen, J. M. (1990). “Taxation and The Political Economy of the Tarif”, International Organization, 44, 4, Autumn, by The World Peace Foundation and The Masschusetts Institute of Technology.
Hayashi, D. (1992). “Preventing Human Rights Abuses in the U.S. Garmen Industry: A Proposed Amandment to the Fair Labor Standards Act”, Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 17: 195.
Hylton, K. N. (1996). “A Theori of Minimun Contract Terms, With Implications for Labor Law.” Texas Law Review. Vol. 74: 1741.
Kertanegoro, S. (2002). Pengupahan (Wages). Jakarta: Yayasan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia.
Kompas: 1 Agustus 1998, 3 Maret 1999, 20 September 2000, 25 Januri 2001, 28 Januari 2001, 5 Juli 2001, 17 Nopember 2001, 23 Nopember 2001, 29 April 2006.
Kantaatmadja, K (1989). Beberapa Hal Tentang Arbitrase, Kertas Kerja Pada Penataran Hukum Ekonomi Internasional, (Bandung: Unpad-Utrecht.
Lew, J.D.M. (!993). Determination of Arbitration’s Jurisdiction and the Public Policy Limitation onthat Jurisdiction, dalam Adolf, Huala. Arbitrase Komersial Internasional, (Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Caffrey, M.S.G. (1993). “North American Free Trade and Accomplishments and Challenges”, Hofstra Labor Law Journal, Vol. 10: 2 (1993).
Midford, P. (1993). “International Trade and Domestic Politics: Improving on Rogowski’s Model of Political Alignments”, International Organization 47, 4, Autumn, pp. 535-564 @ (1994) by The IO Foundation and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Manezas, J. (1981). Law and Absolute Poverty, Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 15.
Naskah Persiapan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, I, (Jakarta: Yayasan Prapantja, 1959.
Nollen, S.D; Dennis, P.Q. (1987). “Free Trade, Strategic Trade and Protectionism in the U.S. Congress”, International Organization 48.
Nollen, S.D; Dennis, P.Q. (1987). “Free Trade, Fair Trade, Strategic Trade and Protectionism in The U.S. Congress”, Internanational Organization 48. 3 (Summer 1994), pp. 491-525 @ (1994) by The IQ Foundation and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Manique, O.J. (1992). Development, Human Rights and Law, Human Rights Quarterly Vol. 14.
Paust, J.J. (1995). “The Human Right to Die with Dignity: A Policy-Oriented Essay”. Human Rights Quaterly, 17 by The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Player, M. A. (1992). Federal Law of Employment Discrimination in A Nutshell, St. Paul, Minn. West Publishing Co.
Rajagukguk, E. (1993). Etika Bisnis dalam Rangka Pembentukan Hukum Bisnis Indonesia, diselenggarakan Senat Mahasiswa FH-Univ. Katolik Parahiyangan di Bandung, tanggal 7-8 Mei.
Rajagukguk, E. (2000). Arbitrase Dalam Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Chandra Pratama.
Romeo, R; Silvana, S. (1995). “The Protection of Employees’ Privacy: A Survey of Ilatian Legislation and Case Law.” Comparative Labor Law Journal, Vol. 17: 91.
Romeo, R; Silvana, S. (1995). “The Protection of Employees’ Privacy: a Survey of Italia Legislation and Case Law”, Comparative Labor Law Journal, (Vol. 17: 91).
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang No.39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 dan Amandemen dengan Penjelasan disertai Susunan Kabinet.
Rosen, S.M. (1992). “Protecting Labor Rights in Market Ekonomies”, Human Rights Quarterly 14, 371 - 382 @ 1992 by The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rosen, S.M; Steven, F. A. (1994). “How The Taft Harley Act Hindered Unions”, Hofstra LaborLaw Journal, (Vol. 12:1).
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang No.12 Tahun 1964 tentang Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK).
Republik Indonesia, UU No.2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial, Lembaran Negara RI, Tahun 2004 No.6.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahubn 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 6
Republik Indonesia, UU No.30 Tahun 1999 tentang Abitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Republik Indonesia, UU No.80 Tahun 1957 tentang Persetujuan Konvensi ILO No.100.
Sherman, M; AI, L. (1992). “Positive Discipline and Labor Arbitration”, Arbitration Journal, (June).
Peradilan, Varia (1993). Majalah Hukum, Tahun X No.115 April.
Soejono, R. Pedoman Perburuhan, (Jakarta: GCI van Dorp & Co NV, 1952).
Strauss, G; Leonard, S. (1990). Manajemen Personalia, Segi Manusia dalam Organisasi, (Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Presindo.
Sulaiman, A. (2002). Perselisihan Buruh: Sektor Usaha Garmen. Jakarta: YPPSDM.
Sulaiman, A. (2003). Tenaga Kerja Indonesia. Jakarta: YPPSDM, 2003.
Sulaiman, A. (2004). Politik Hukum Buruh RI. Jakarta: YPPSDM, 2004.
Sulaiman, A. (2004). Penelitian Hukum (Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Konten), Modul Program Magister Ilmu Hukum.
Sulaiman, A. (2005). Sejarah Hukum Perburuhan di Indonesia, Modul Bahan Materi Hukum Perburuhan Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum, Tahun 2005.
Sulaiman, A. (2006). Peradilan Buruh. Jakarta: Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Univ. Islam Jakarta.
Sulaiman, A. (2006). Standar Buruh: di Perdagangan Bebas.Jakarta: Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Jakarta.
Sulaiman, A. (2006). Standar Buruh di Jepang, Jurnal Reformasi Hukum, Vol. 2.
Sulaiman, A (2008). Upah di Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti, 2008.
Sulaiman, A (2016). Fundamen Hukum Perburuhan Terhadap Pemberian Penghasilan dalam Era Globalisasi di Indonesia, Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia (Kumpulan Karangan), Editor; Nurul Elmiyah-Rosa Agustina. Jakarta: FH-UI, Mei.
Sulaiman, A. (2019) dan Andi, W. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan/Perburuhan. Jakarta: YPPSDM Jakarta, 2019.
Stutzman, A.K. (1993). “Our Eroding Industrial Base: U.S. Labor Laws Compared with Labor Laws of Less Developed Nations in Light of the Global Economy”, 12 Dick J. Int’l Law, Fall.
Summers, C. (1992). “Lord Edderburn’s New Labour Law: An American Perspective”, Indutrial Law Journal, Vol. 12 No. 3 September Industrial Law Society).
Shamad, Y. (1992). Pengupahan Pedoman bagi Pengelola Sumber Daya Manusia di Perusahaan. Jakarta: Bina Sumber Daya Manusia.
Spracker, S.M; Gregory, J.M. (1993). "Labor Issue Under the NAFTA: Options in the Wake of the Agreement”, The International Lawyer, Vol. 23. No. 3, Fall
Surin, E.C. (1992). “Government Influence on Labor Unions in A Newly Industrized Economy: A Look at the Singapure Labor System”, Comperative Labor Law Journal, (Vol. 18: 102).
Subekti, R; Tjitrosudibio, R. (1980). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Terjemahan Burgerlik Wetboek. Jakarta: Paradnya Paramita.
Suziani. (tth). Kasus Nike di Indonesia, Meneropong Kondisi Kerja Buruh Perusahaan Sepatu Olahraga, (Jakarta: Praninta Jaya Mandiri)
Vranken, M. (1994). “Demise of the Australian Model Labor Law in the 1990s”, Comparative Labor Law Journal, (Vol. 16: 1).
Wet, E.d. (1995). “Labor Standars in The Globalized Economy: The Inclusion of a Social Clause in The General Agreement On Tarif and Trade/World Trade Organization.” Human Rights Quarterly. 17 443-462 by The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wedderburn, L. (2007). Labour Law: 40 Years on, Industrial Law Journal. December, 36 Indus. J.L. 397, Copyright by Law Society.
Zifchak, W.C. (1983). "Collective Bargaining in The Reagan Era: A Management Perspective”, Hofstra Labor Law Forum, Volume I. No. I, Winter.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v8i2.15622 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
