SHIDQ IKHTIBAR AL-QABUUL FII AL JAAMI'AH

Raswan Raswan

doi:10.15408/a.v2i1.1300

SHIDQ IKHTIBAR AL-QABUUL FII AL JAAMI'AH

Raswan Raswan

Abstract

This article is result of research on the validity of the college entrance test. College entrance test including programs of study must have the characteristics of a good test especially predictive validity. Entrance test study program Master of Arabic Education (PBA) FITK UIN Jakarta consists of four types of tests; the Academic Potential Test (TPA), TOAFL, TOEFL and interviews, the four must be able to predict exactly when the students join the program. That is, students who earn higher test scores should be able to follow the course as evidenced by the value of IP and or higher GPA compared with the results of the entry test lower. Similarly in predicting students graduate on time, which requires in addition to success in the lecture was also successful in the final project / Thesis which some students a frightening specter. Its mean that students with higher admission tests should be faster in completing the study compared with the lower value of the entry test. If not, then it must be held meta-evaluation of the instruments and implementation of entrance tests which have already become standards.

DOI: 10.15408/a.v2i1.1300

Keywords

college entrance test; academic potencial test; TOEFL; TOAFL

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdul Wahab, Muhbib. Epistemologi & Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Jakarta: UIN Jakarta Press, 2008. Cet. 1.

Andreson, Scarvia B. et. al: ‘Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluatin’, (Sanfransisco, Washington, London; Jossey Bass Publisher, 1976).

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi), Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2009, cet. ke-10.

Asrori, Imam, Muhammad Thgohir dan M. Ainin. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Malang: Misykat, 2012, cet. ke-3.

Cronbach, Lee J. Problem of Pshycological Testing, (New York; Holt Ronehart and Winston, 1960).

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1988), cet. 1.

Elfitri, Ayu Rahayu. Menilik Perbedaan TOEFL dan IELTS, Rabu, 28 Maret 2012 dalam http://edukasi.kompas.com diunduh 16 maret 2013.

Harahap, H. A. H. dan Soegarda Poerwakadja, (ed.), “Test”, Ensiklopedi Pendidikan, (Jakarta: Gunung Aagung, 1981), cet. 2.

Ibrahim, R. dan Nana Syaodih S. Perencanaan Pengajaran, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.

Indrakusuma, Amier Daien. “Evaluasi Pendidikan“ Penilaian Hasil-Hasil Belajar, (tt: Terbitan Sendiri, tth) Jilid I.

Kamus Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008.

Matsna HS, Moh., dan Erta Mahyudin. Pengembangan Evaluasi dan Tes Bahasa Arab, (Tangerang Selatan: al-Kitabah, 2012).

Popham, W. James (University of California, Los Angeles). Calssroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know, Boston-London-Toronto-Sydney-Tokyo-Singapore: Allyn and Bacon, 1994.

Purwanto, M. Ngalim. Prisnsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran, (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2004) cet. 12.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v2i1.1300 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0