Javanese Generation Z Responding to Apology Situations: Negotiating Harmony and Boundaries in Sociopragmatic Interaction

Sri  Waluyo; Ratih Laily Nurjanah; Atsani Wulansari

doi:10.15408/bat.v32i2.50584

Authors

Sri Waluyo STMIK Bina Patria
Ratih Laily Nurjanah Universitas Ngudi Waluyo
Atsani Wulansari Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v32i2.50584

Keywords:

Apology responses, Generation Z, Javanese culture, Speech acts, Politeness strategies

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigates the speech act of apology responses among Javanese Generation Z individuals, exploring how modern youth navigate the complex intersection of traditional cultural values and contemporary communicative norms.

Method

Using a Discourse Completion Task (DCT) comprising eight distinct written situations that systematically vary sociolinguistic dimensions—such as social distance, power dynamics, and offense severity—data was collected from 53 Javanese Generation Z participants, yielding 424 utterances. The collected utterances were analyzed based on a synthesized taxonomy of apology response strategies, categorizing responses into four primary macro-strategies: Acceptance, Acknowledgement, Evasion, and Rejection along with their micro-strategies.

Results/findings

The findings show a strong tendency toward Acceptance in most situations, reflecting the enduring influence of Javanese values such as rukun (social harmony) and njaga rasa (guarding feelings). However, in more sensitive contexts—such as repeated offenses, peer accountability, and service-related issues—participants shift toward Acknowledgement and Evasion, indicating a more direct and assertive approach. Despite this shift, outright Rejection remains rare, suggesting it is still socially dispreferred.

Conclusion

Overall, Javanese Generation Z demonstrates a balance between maintaining traditional politeness and adapting to modern expectations of directness and accountability.

References

Aboud, F. (2020). The use of apology strategies by Arab postgraduate students. Eastern Mediterranean University.

Adrefiza, A. (2024). Comparing the use of linguistic hedging devices (LHDs) in English and Bahasa Indonesia: Gender and pedagogical perspectives. Innovare Journal of Education, 12(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i2.49786

Adrefiza, & Jones, J. F. (2013). Investigating apology response strategies in Australian English and Bahasa Indonesia: Gender and cultural perspectives. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 71–101.

Akmal, S., Husna, H., Maulida, T. A., & Farkhan, M. (2022). A qualitative inquiry of politeness approaches through gender category: Evidences from university students in Aceh. Buletin Al-Turas, 28(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v28i2.26515

Astutik, S. D., Fauziati, E., & Haryanto, S. (2025). Direct and indirect expressive speech acts in celebrity apology posts on Instagram: A pragmatic analysis. ELTALL: English Language Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literature, 6(2), 115–128. https://jurnal.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/eltall

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.

Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5, 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Budiono, T., & Mubarok, Y. (2022). Word formation of the Indonesian Covid-19 special terms. Buletin Al-Turas, 28(2), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v28i2.26044

Chen, R., & Yang, D. (2010). Responding to compliments in Chinese: Has it changed? Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1951–1963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.006

Chung, C. A., & Chen, C. D. (2022). Universality? Cross-linguistic influence? Evidence from Chinese and English apology response strategy use. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 48(2), 174–211. https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.22014.che

Fauzan. (2020). The realisation of speech acts of complaining among native Javanese speakers in the village council: An ethno-pragmatic study. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Www.Ijicc.Net, 14(2), 2020. www.ijicc.net

Ghasani, B. I. (2018). The semantics and pragmatics analysis of Javanese and English apologetic speech acts. Philosophica, 1(1).

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.

Juansah, D. E., Baihaqi, A., & Hamidiyah, A. (2023). Idiomatic phrases among Banten Sundanese local language speakers: An exploratory case study. Buletin Al-Turas, 29(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v29i1.30329

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mahmud, M. (2020). Managing respect among English students in social media conversations (Whatsapp chats) through polite expressions. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 27(3), 253–276.

Maruti, E. S. (2016). Apologizing speech acts through samudana indirectly in Javanese language. Ranah, 5(1), 53.

Maruti, E. S. (2021). Direct open strategy in Javanese apology speech act: A pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(2), 2021. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr/v1i2.193

Mustikawati, D. A. (2021, October 7). Javanese speech politeness in expressive speech act of women leader utterance in Ponorogo Regency. Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311680

Purnomo, B. (2017). Politeness on Whatsapp: The responses to greetings and congratulations by English speaking groups in Indonesia. 6th ELTLT International Conference Proceedings, 109–112.

Rachmatika, A. S. E., & Nurhayati, N. (2020). Tindak tutur direktif: Realisasi tindak tutur menyuruh dalam bahasa Jawa pada keluarga penutur Jawa. Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajaran (KIBASP), 3(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.31539/kibasp.v3i2.1171

Ramlah, S., & Sartini, N. W. (2023). Strategy, factor, and response of apologies in Javanese and Madurese: A cross-cultural pragmatics study. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2275341

Rehmat, S., Ahmed, I., & Maqbool, S. (2024). Pragmatics insights of Pakistani English: An analysis of congratulatory acts and apology responses. Spry Contemporary Educational Practices (SCEP), 3(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.62681/sprypublishers.scep/3/1/10

Saleem, T., Anjum, U., & Khalid, M. (2020). Influence of social stratification on Pakistani English speakers apology responses: A phenomenological approach. Pakistani Journal of Society, Education and Language, 7(1), 2523–1227.

Saleem, T., Hakal, M., & Azam, S. (2020). Transcultural pragmatics awareness in ESL classroom: A case of Pakistani English speakers. Erevna: Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 4(1), 52–69.

Saleem, T., Unjum, U., Ahmed, M. I., & Qadeer, A. (2021). Social distance and speech behavior: A case of Pakistani English speakers’ apology responses. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1890410

Saleem, T., Yasmin, M., & Saleem, A. (2021). Linguistic politeness of Pakistani English and British English speakers: Culture and gender perspectives. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1996917

Santika, I. D. A. D. M., Andriyani, A. A. A. D., & Winarta, I. B. G. N. (2022). Language function from Balinese daily conversations. Language and Education Journal Undiksha, 5(1), 52–59. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPBI

Sari, M. K. (2021). The Reflection of Javanese cultural characteristics as found in English apology strategies. Modality Journal: International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.30983/mj.v1i1.4662

Sari, Y. A., & Suhono. (2024). Request and politeness strategies in the Javanese-speaking generation Z community: A pragmatic study. Bulletin of Science Education, (2). https://attractivejournal.com/index.php/bse/index

Savana, A. F., & Rosiah, R. (2019). Apologies in “Whatsapp” produced by Japanese department student of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Izumi: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya Jepang, 8(2), 75–81.

Shalihah, M., & Zuhdi, M. N. (2020). Language politeness in students’ text messages sent to the lecturers through WhatsApp application: A sociopragmatic study. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 5(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v5i2.4926

Sukarno. (2018). Politeness strategies, linguistic markers and social contexts in delivering requests in Javanese. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9816

Surana, Susilo, Y., & Rosidah, A. (2019). Promoting character education: Speech acts of requests in Javanese language used by Tanjung community. Advances in Social Science, Education and HUmanities Research, 335.

Susylowati, E. (2013). Tindak tutur percakapan bahasa Jawa dalam Kraton Surakarta Hadiningrat. Seminar Nasional Prasasti II “Kajian Pragmatik Dalam Berbagai Bidang,” 225–227.

Trang, N. T. H., & Khuong, L. Q. (2022). A lexicogrammar approach to analyze response strategies to apology in English conversations. International Journal of English Language Studies, 4(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels

Waluyo, S. (2017). Apology response strategies performed by EFL learners. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 1(2), 94–109.

Waluyo, S., & Sutiyatno, S. (2020). Apology response strategies used by Indonesian EFL fresh graduates: On gender and academic achievement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1517(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1517/1/012055

Wensi, F. K., Puspita, H., & Afriazi, R. (2018). Students’ strategies in responding teachers’ oral questions. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 2(2), 35–44.

Wibowo, S. E. (2020). The practice of adu rasa, angon rasa, and njaga rasa in the speech act of Javanese Kiai: An ethnographic study. Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora, 19(1), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v19i1.41459

Wijirahayu, S., Digdoyo, E., Hendryanti, R., & Fathin, A. A. (2026). Digital fluency: Why gamers might make better communicators. Buletin Al-Turas, 32(1), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v32i1.50194

Zulkhaeriyah, Saleh, N. J., Yassi, A. H., & Rahman, F. (2021). Strategy of apology in Buginese: A sociolinguistic study. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 4(2), 2021. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v4i2.14015