Human Rights Fulfilment in Lapindo Mudflow-Affected Communities: A Maqāsid Fulfilment Index Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v26i1.50181Keywords:
Anthropocentric interpretation, Eclectic method, al-Shāfi‘ī legal formulationAbstract
Long-term recovery after the Lapindo mudflow cannot be assessed solely by technical rehabilitation, relocation, compensation, or service restoration. This study analyzes human rights fulfillment among affected Muslim communities using a minimum obligation framework based on maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The five dimensions (religion, life, intellect, family, and wealth) are expressed as 25 rights indicators within the Maqāṣid Fulfilment Index (MFI). Data from 300 respondents in Tanggulangin, Jabon, and Porong were analyzed using normalized scoring, the Kruskal-Wallis test, stakeholder accountability mapping, and normative legal benchmarking. Results show moderate but uneven fulfillment. Life and intellect are relatively stronger, while wealth, compensation, legal aid, documentation, and religious and family support remain weak. This study introduces a measurable tool to link rights deficits with vulnerability, institutional accountability, and recovery pathways in long-term disaster governance. It reframes recovery as a question of measurable protection, responsibility, and remedy over time.
Abstrak
Pemulihan jangka panjang pasca letusan lumpur Lapindo tidak dapat dinilai hanya melalui rehabilitasi teknis, relokasi, kompensasi, atau pemulihan layanan. Studi ini menilai pemenuhan hak asasi manusia komunitas Muslim terdampak melalui kerangka kewajiban minimum berbasis maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. Lima dimensi yang diukur, yaitu agama, jiwa, akal, keluarga, dan harta, dioperasionalkan menjadi 25 indikator hak dalam Maqāṣid Fulfilment Index (MFI). Data dikumpulkan dari 300 responden di Tanggulangin, Jabon, dan Porong, lalu dianalisis melalui skor ternormalisasi, uji Kruskal Wallis, pemetaan akuntabilitas pemangku kepentingan, dan pembandingan norma hukum. Hasil menunjukkan pemenuhan sedang tetapi tidak merata. Jiwa dan akal relatif lebih kuat, sedangkan harta, kompensasi, bantuan hukum, dokumentasi, serta dukungan agama dan keluarga masih rapuh. Studi ini berkontribusi melalui instrumen terukur yang menghubungkan defisit pemenuhan hak dengan distribusi kerentanan, akuntabilitas institusional, dan jalur pemulihan dalam tata kelola bencana jangka panjang. Dengan demikian, pemulihan dibaca sebagai persoalan perlindungan, tanggung jawab, dan remedy yang terukur dari waktu ke waktu.
References
Aaltonen, K., Derakhshan, R., Di Maddaloni, F., & Turner, R. (2024). Stakeholder engagement: Theoretical and methodological directions for project scholarship. International Journal of Project Management, 42(7), 102649. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102649
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
Amiruddin, L. (2018). Kritik atas tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan dalam bencana Lumpur Lapindo. Jurnal Kawistara, 8(1). 10.22146/kawistara.29707
Asutay, M., & Yilmaz, I. (2021). Constituting an Islamic social welfare function: an exploration through Islamic moral economy. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 14(3), 524–540. 10.1108/IMEFM-03-2019-0130
Baderin, M. A. (2001). Establishing Areas of Common Ground between Islamic Law and International Human Rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 5(2), 72–113. 10.1080/714003711
Balane, M. A., Palafox, B., Palileo-Villanueva, L. M., McKee, M., & Balabanova, D. (2020). Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: Towards a novel framing and operationalised measures. BMJ Global Health, 5, e002661. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002661
Baskhoro, A. E. (2025). Human Rights: Reflection, Criticism, and a New Paradigm Model from Indonesia for the World. Makassar: PT Nas Media Indonesia.
Baskhoro, A. E., & Nguyen, T. P. L. (2025). The Intersection of Human Rights and Disaster: Assessing Natural Resource-based Livelihoods in the Lapindo Mudflow Affected Area. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 26(S2), 3941–3957. 10.70135/seejph.vi.5913
Bedoui, H., & Mansour, W. (2020). Performance and Maqasid al-Shari’ah’s Pentagon-Shaped Ethical Measurement. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 555–576. 10.1007/s11948-014-9561-9
Bosnak, J. E. (2015). Soap Opera and Muddy Affairs in Indonesia: The Cultural Politics of the Lapindo Mudflow Case (2006–2014). Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 171(4), 455–488. 10.1163/22134379-17104002
Boyland, M., & Anschell, N. (2023). Integrating rights and equality in disaster preparedness and response: Insights from six countries. SEI Report. Stockholm Environment Institute. 10.51414/sei2023.023
Chang, S. E. (2010). Urban disaster recovery: a measurement framework and its application to the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Disasters, 34(2), 303–327. 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01130.x
Christiani, T. A. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 201–207. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Dahlan, M., Bustami, M. R., Makmur, & Mas’ulah, S. (2021). The Islamic principle of hifz al-nafs (protection of life) and COVID-19 in Indonesia: A case study of Nurul Iman mosque of Bengkulu city. Heliyon, 7(7), e07541. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07541
Davies, R. J., Swarbrick, R. E., Evans, R. J., & Huuse, M. (2007). Birth of a mud volcano: East Java, 29 May 2006. GSA Today, 17(2), 4–9. 10.1130/GSAT01702A.1
Dedihasriadi, L. O., Ananda, A. I., Sugiharti, D. K., Baskhoro, A. E., & Hasgar A.S., A. M. (2026). Strengthening Indigenous Peoples’ Rights: Integrating the FPIC Principle into Indonesia’s Mining Legal Framework. Cepalo, 10(1), 1–12. 10.25041/cepalo.v10no1.4899
Donnelly, J. (2007). The Relative Universality of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(2), 281–306. 10.1353/hrq.2007.0016
Drake, P. (2016). Multiple visions of Indonesia’s mud volcano: understanding representations of disaster across discursive settings. Disasters, 40(2), 346–364. 10.1111/disa.12145
Drake, P. (2018). Emergent injustices: An evolution of disaster justice in Indonesia’s mud volcano. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(3). 10.1177/2514848618788359
Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. 10.2307/1266041
Ekawati, J., & Sulistyowati, E. (2021). The Vulnerability of Settlements in the Areas Impacted by Lapindo Mudflow Disaster, Sidoarjo. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 830, 012035. 10.1088/1755-1315/830/1/012035
Emon, A. M., Ellis, M., & Glahn, B. (Eds.). (2012). Islamic Law and International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641444.001.0001
Farida, A. (2014). Reconstructing Social Identity for Sustainable Future of Lumpur Lapindo Victims. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 468–476. 10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.059
Forman, L., Beiersmann, C., Brolan, C. E., McKee, M., Hammonds, R., & Ooms, G. (2016). What Do Core Obligations under the Right to Health Bring to Universal Health Coverage? Health and Human Rights, 18(2), 23–34.
Fuo, O., & Du Plessis, A. (2015). In the face of judicial deference: Taking the “minimum core” of socio-economic rights to the local government sphere. Law, Democracy & Development, 19(1), 1–28. 10.4314/ldd.v19i1.1
Galaitsi, S. E., Pinigina, E., Keisler, J. M., Pescaroli, G., Keenan, J. M., & Linkov, I. (2023). Business Continuity Management, Operational Resilience, and Organizational Resilience: Commonalities, Distinctions, and Synthesis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 14, 713–721. 10.1007/s13753-023-00494-x
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61–94. 10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9
Harahap, B., Risfandy, T., & Futri, I. N. (2023). Islamic Law, Islamic Finance, and Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 15(8), 6626. 10.3390/su15086626
Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Velev, S., Laurien, F., Campbell, K., Czajkowski, J., Keating, A., & Mechler, R. (2021). Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe. Scientific Reports, 11, 17625. 10.1038/s41598-021-96763-0
Hoffmann, R., & Blecha, D. (2020). Education and Disaster Vulnerability in Southeast Asia: Evidence and Policy Implications. Sustainability, 12(4), 1401. 10.3390/su12041401
Husien, S. (2024). Legal Uncertainty Regarding the Status of Children Born Out of Wedlock in the Perspective of Hifdzu al-Nasl. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 40(2), 63–74. 10.26532/jh.v40i2.41290
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI), adopted 16 December 1966).
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI), adopted 16 December 1966).
Jordan, E., & Javernick-Will, A. (2013). Indicators of Community Recovery: Content Analysis and Delphi Approach. Natural Hazards Review, 14(1), 21–28. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000087
Kamali, M. H. (2025). Goals and Purposes of Shariah: Maqasid in Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/9780197786390.001.0001
Kasri, R., & Ahmed, H. (2019). Assessing Socio-Economic Development Based on Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Principles: Normative Frameworks, Methods and Pilot Implementation in Indonesia. In S. Ali (Ed.), Towards a Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Index of Socio-Economic Development, 349–378. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-3-030-12793-0_13
Kennedy, M. R. T., Coelho, C., Turkstra, L., Ylvisaker, M., Sohlberg, M. M., Yorkston, K., Chiou, H.-H., & Kan, P.-F. (2008). Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(3), 257–299. 10.1080/09602010701748644
Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder”. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621. 10.2307/2280779
Leijten, I. (2017). The German Right to an Existenzminimum, Human Dignity, and the Possibility of Minimum Core Socioeconomic Rights Protection. German Law Journal, 16(1), 23–48. 10.1017/S2071832200019416
Lelea, M. A., Roba, G. M., Christinck, A., & Kaufmann, B. (2014). Methodologies for Stakeholder Analysis: For Application in Transdisciplinary Research Projects Focusing on Actors in Food Supply Chains. DITSL / RELOAD.
Lichuma, C. O. (2021). (Laws) Made in the ‘First World’: A TWAIL Critique of the Use of Domestic Legislation to Extraterritorially Regulate Global Value Chains. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 81(2), 497–532. 10.17104/0044-2348-2021-2-497
Li, L., Chang-Richards, A., Boston, M., Elwood, K., & Molina Hutt, C. (2023). Post-disaster functional recovery of the built environment: A systematic review and directions for future research. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 95, 103899. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103899
Manga, M. (2007). Did an earthquake trigger the May 2006 eruption of the Lusi Mud volcano? Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 88(18), 201. 10.1029/2007EO180009
March, A. F. (2011). The Maqsad of Hifz al-Din: Is Liberal Religious Freedom Sufficient for the Shari’ah? ICR Journal, 2(2), 358–378. 10.52282/icr.v2i2.653
McClelland, A. G., Shaw, D., O’Grady, N., & Fattoum, A. (2023). Recovery for Development: A Multi-Dimensional, Practice-Oriented Framework for Transformative Change Post-Disaster. The Journal of Development Studies, 59(1), 1–20. 10.1080/00220388.2022.2130055
McCorquodale, R., & Simons, P. (2007). Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law. The Modern Law Review, 70(4), 598–625. 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00654.x
McMichael, H. (2009). The Lapindo mudflow disaster: environmental, infrastructure and economic impact. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 45(1), 73–83. 10.1080/00074910902836189
Merry, S. E. (2013). Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle. In R. Provost & C. Sheppard (Eds.), Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-4710-4_10
Mohsin, A. (2018). Coping with Indonesia’s Mudflow Disaster. In S. Amir (Ed.), The Sociotechnical Constitution of Resilience. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-981-10-8509-3_6
Novenanto, A. (2015). Discoursing Disaster: Power and Actor of the Lapindo Case in Indonesia. PhD Dissertation in Anthropology, Faculty of Behavioural and Cultural Studies, Heidelberg University.
Olika, D. (2024). Taxation and human rights: Towards a sustainable realisation of minimum core obligations in Nigeria. African Human Rights Law Journal, 24(1), 31–57. 10.17159/1996-2096/2024/v24n1a2
Oliver-Smith, A. (1996). Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 303–328. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.303
Opwis, F. (2005). Maṣlaḥa in Contemporary Islamic Legal Theory. Islamic Law and Society, 12(2), 182–223. 10.1163/1568519054093699
Padawangi, R. (2016). Muddy Resistance: Community Empowerment in Mudflow Disaster Governance in Porong, Sidoarjo, Indonesia. In M. Miller & M. Douglass (Eds.), Disaster Governance in Urbanising Asia. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978-981-287-649-2_4
Palupi, L. (2021). Did socioeconomic status influence psychological preparedness for potential disaster of resident around Lapindo mud disaster. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 698(1), 012012. 10.1088/1755-1315/698/1/012012
Putri, N. P. A. M., Jung, Y., Indriani, D. A. A., Sitohang, Y., Ulandari, N. N. T., Tarigan, H. B. B., Karisma, F. L., & Christiawan, P. I. (2025). The Lapindo Mudflow Tragedy: Traces of Human Error in Environmental Disasters. SHS Web of Conferences, 221, 02006. 10.1051/shsconf/202522102006
Ravallion, M. (2012). Mashup Indices of Development. The World Bank Research Observer, 27(1), 1–32. 10.1093/wbro/lkr009
Rosele, M. I., Muneem, A., Che Seman, A. B., Abdullah, L. B. H., Abdul Rahman, N. N. B., Abd Sukor, M. E. B., & Ali, A. K. B. (2022). The Concept of Wealth (māl) in the Sharīʿah and Its Relation to Digital Assets. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–13. 10.1177/21582440221102424
Ruggie, J. G. (2010). Protect, Respect, and Remedy: The UN Framework for Business and Human Rights. In M. A. Baderin & M. Ssenyonjo (Eds.), International Human Rights Law: Six Decades after the UDHR and Beyond, 519–540. Farnham: Ashgate.
Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(2), 307–323. 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x
Saja, A. M. A., Teo, M., Goonetilleke, A., & Ziyath, A. M. (2019). An inclusive and adaptive framework for measuring social resilience to disasters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 862–873. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.004
Saja, A. M. A., Teo, M., Goonetilleke, A., & Ziyath, A. M. (2021). A Critical Review of Social Resilience Properties and Pathways in Disaster Management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 12, 790–804. 10.1007/s13753-021-00378-y
Song, Z., Zhu, J., & Bao, J. (2025). Exploring the Evolutionary Traits of Post-Disaster Reconstruction Under the Background of Sustainable Development. Systems, 13(12), 1063. 10.3390/systems13121063
Sukmana, O. (2020). Phases and Dynamics of the Social Movement Process in Indonesia: A Case Study on LAPINDO Mudflow Disaster Victims against the Government. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 1413–1425. 10.33258/birci.v3i2.1001
Tate, E. (2012). Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards, 63, 325–347. 10.1007/s11069-012-0152-2
Tedesco, A. M., López-Cubillos, S., Chazdon, R., Rhodes, J. R., Archibald, C. L., Pérez-Hämmerle, K.-V., Brancalion, P. H. S., Wilson, K. A., Oliveira, M., Correa, D. F., Ota, L., Morrison, T. H., Possingham, H. P., Mills, M., Santos, F. C., & Dean, A. J. (2023). Beyond ecology: ecosystem restoration as a process for social-ecological transformation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38(7), 643–653. 10.1016/j.tree.2023.02.007
The Sphere Project. (2000). Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response. Geneva: The Sphere Project.
Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster Governance: Social, Political, and Economic Dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341–363. 10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618
Wagenaar, H., Kieslich, K., Hangel, N., Zimmermann, B., & Prainsack, B. (2022). Collaborative comparisons: A pragmatist approach towards designing large-scale, comparative qualitative research. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100172. 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100172
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. CHEST, 158(1 Suppl.), S65–S71. 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Weis, L. K., & Mullins, R. (2025). Does Nature Need Rights? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(4), 839–871. 10.1093/ojls/gqaf021
Willems, T., & Van Dooren, W. (2012). Coming to Terms with Accountability: Combining multiple forums and functions. Public Management Review, 14(7), 1011–1036. 10.1080/14719037.2012.662446
Zaman, M. O., & Raihan, M. M. H. (2023). Community resilience to natural disasters: A systemic review of contemporary methods and theories. Natural Hazards Research, 3(3), 583–594. 10.1016/j.nhres.2023.05.003
Zhu, W., Zhang, J., Porth, L., & Tan, K. S. (2025). Index-based Insurance Design for Climate and Weather Risk Management: A Review. In H. Assa, P. Liu, & S. Wang (Eds.), Quantitative Risk Management in Agricultural Business. Cham: Springer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arie Baskhoro, Thi Phuoc Lai Nguyen, Amany Lubis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




