Popular Sovereignty in the Framework of Constitutional Philosophy
Abstract
This essay discusses the concept of popular sovereignty as a primary principle in a democratic system and how it is applied in constitutional philosophy. Popular sovereignty asserts that the highest power lies in the hands of the people and is realised through constitutional mechanisms. However, there are often clashes between the people's will and state policies, especially in law enforcement. Therefore, a strong philosophical, sociological, and legal foundation is needed so that the constitution truly becomes an instrument for protecting people's rights. This essay also proposes several recommendations, such as strengthening public participation, ensuring government transparency, and guaranteeing judicial independence. In addition, political education and constitutional awareness of the community are key to maintaining a healthy democracy. By implementing these steps, popular sovereignty can be realised in a real way in a democratic and just government system.
References
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Konstitusi Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1998). On Democracy. Yale University Press.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dicey, A. V. (1885). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Macmillan.
Durkheim, E. (1997). The Division of Labor in Society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1893).
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press.
Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966).
Kelsen, H. (1934). Pure Theory of Law. University of California Press.
Kelsen, H. (1945). General Theory of Law and State. Harvard University Press.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Crown Publishing Group.
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Locke, J. (1690). Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press.
Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1690).
Montesquieu, C. (1748). The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Rosenfeld, M. (2001). Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference, and Legitimacy: Theoretical Perspectives. Duke University Press.
Rousseau, J. J. (1762). The Social Contract. Penguin Books.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2003). The Social Contract (G. D. H. Cole, Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1762).
Schmitt, C. (1922). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. University of Chicago Press.
Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What democracy is... and is not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75-88.
Setiawan, B. (2020). Kritik terhadap UU ITE dalam perspektif demokrasi. Jakarta: Pustaka Demokrasi.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press.
Transparency International. (2020). Corruption perceptions index 2020. Retrieved from www.transparency.org
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).
Weber, M. (1922). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v7i2.46364
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.