Structure and Measurement of Basic Value: Validity Test of Multidimensional Constructions Schwartz Value Survey (SVS)
Abstract
Abstract
Applying the main principles of life is important to support the daily life of transmigrant students. As explained by Rokeach (in Sauter, 1984), values are rules and principles which learned to help choose life alternatives, resolve conflicts and make decisions. Related to the concept of value, this study used the basic concepts of Schwartz (2005). The purpose of this research is to test the construct validity of the modified Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) measuring instrument by adjusting the conditions of research respondents. This instrument is used to measure the values of transmigrant students in living their lives and learning processes. Dimensions of this instrument are multidimensional. There are 10 dimensions used in the basic value variable, namely self-direction, stimulation, hedonism, achievement, power, security, conformity, tradition, benevolence, and universalism with a total of 50 items. This study involved 251 participants, with an age range between 19-21 years. Participants in this study were active students of UIN SyarifHidayatullah Jakarta from outside the Greater Jakarta area (Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi) who currently live in boarding houses, dormitories or rented houses. The factor analysis method used in this study is Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with a Lisrel 8.70 program. The test results prove that all subscales fit measure one factor and there are 50 valid items. And these results showed that all of aspect in basic value, which consists of 10 aspects that are multidimensional. CFA test results show that all 10 aspects of basic value are fit with the data.
Abstrak
Untuk menjalani proses kehidupan dan belajar pada mahasiswa merantau, maka perlu hendaknya mengaplikasikan prinsip-prinsip utama yang ada di dalam diri. Rokeach (dalam Sauter, 1984)menjelaskan bahwa value merupakan prinsip-prinsip yang dipelajari dan aturan untuk membantu memilih alternatif-alternatif yang ada, menyelesaikan konflik dan membuat keputusan. Terkait konsep tentang value, penelitian ini menggunakan konsep dasar dari Schwartz (2005). Tujuan adanya penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji validitas konstruk alat ukur Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) yang dimodifikasi dengan menyesuaikan kondisi responden penelitian. Instrumen ini digunakan untuk mengukur nilai-nilai yang dimiliki mahasiswa rantau dalam menjalani kehidupan dan proses belajar. Dimensi dalam alat ukur ini merupakan multidimensi. Adapun dimensi yang digunakan pada variabel basic value ini adalah sebanyak 10 dimensi, yaitu self direction, stimulation, hedonism, achievement, power, security, comformity, tradition, benevolence, dan universalism dengan jumlah total aitem sebanyak 53 aitem. Penelitian ini melibatkan 251 partisipan, yakni sebanyak 123 (49%) partisipan laki-laki dan 128 (51%) partisipan perempuan, dengan rentang usia antara 19-21 tahun. Partisipan penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa aktif UIN Jakarta yang berasal dari luar daerah Jabodetabek, yang saat ini tinggal di kostan, asrama atau rumah kontrakan. Metode analisis faktor yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) dengan program lisrel 8.70. Hasil pengujian membuktikan bahwa seluruh subskala fit (sesuai) mengukur model satu faktor dan terdapat 50 aitem yang valid. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa seluruh aspek dalam basic value yang terdiri dari 10 aspek adalah multideimensional. Test CFA menghasilkan 10 aspek basic value yang fit dengan data.
Keywords
References
Allen, M.J. & Yen, W.M. (1979).Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey: Brooks Cole.
Anastasi, A. Dan Urbina, U., 1997, Psychological testing (seventh edition), Prentice- allInc, New Jersey.
Bardi, A., & Schwartz. S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Society for Personality and Social Psychology.Inc, 29 (10), 1207-1220.
Bilsky, W., & Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163-181.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Borualogo, I. S. (2014). Pengaruh nilai budaya merantau, sistem nilai, dan dukungan sosial yang dimediasi harga diri terhadap kepegasan sebagai penentu kepuasan hidup. Disertasi (Non Publikasi.) Bandung: Universitas Padjajaran.
Brown, A Timothy. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Cutrona, C. E., & Russel, D. W. (1987). The provision of social relationship and adaptation to stress. Advanced in Personal Relationship, 1, 37-67.
Fischer, R., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Whence differences in value priorities?: Individual, cultural or artifactual sources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42 (7), 1127-1144.
Fox, Jean-Paul. (2010). Bayesian item response modeling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer.
Grunert, S. C., & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes and buying of organic foods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 39-62.
Heck, H. R., & Thomas, L. S. 2005. An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. New York: Routledge Taylor &Prancis Group
Kaplan, R. M. &Saccuzzo. (2005). Psychological Testing: principles, application, and issues (6th ed.). Belmont : Thomson Wadsworth.
Lee, S. Y. (2007). Structural equation modeling: a bayesian approach.Chicester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Misra, R., Crist, M., &Burant, C. J. (2003). Relationships among life stress, social support, academic stressors, and reactions to stressors of international students in the United States. Educational Publishing Foundation, 10 (2), 137-157.
Mugan, R. F. (2005).A response to the psychological and physical health risks of international college students studying in the united states: an integrative program proposal. Dissertation. University of Hartford.
Muthen, B. O. 1989. Latent variable modeling in heterogenous populations.Psychometrika, 54, No. 4, 557-585.
Nosse, L. J., & Sagiv, L. (2005). Theory-based study of the basic values of 565 physical therapists. Physical Therapy, 85, 834-850.
Oebadillah, S. (2015).Peringkat 11 PTN TerbaikVersiKemristekdikti.Diunduhpadatanggal 13 Oktober 2015, pukul 18:52 WIB dari http://news.metrotvnews.com/read/2015/08/18/422235/peringkat-11-ptn-terbaik-versi-kemristekdikti.
Ros, M., Schwartz, S. H., & Surkiss, S. (1999). Basic individual values, work values, and the meanging of work. International Association of Applied Psychology, 48, 49-71.
Schwartz, S. H. (2005).Basic human values: An overview. Basic human values: Theory, methods, and applications. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, http://151.97.110.134/Allegati/convegno%207-8-10-05/Schwartzpaper.pdf. accessed on 10 Nov 2014.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2 (1). doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universal in the content and structure of value: Theoriticaladvances and empiricaltests in 20 countries. Journal of Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspect in the structure & contents of human values?.Journal of Social Issues, 50 (4), 19-45.
Spini, D. (2003). Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the schwartz value survey across 21 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34 (1), 3-23.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.
Umar, J. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. Bahan ajar perkuliahan. Fakultas Psikologi UIN Jakarta.
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v9i1.14628
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Silvia Febi Putri, Natris Idriyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
