Ideal Double-Track System Construction for Narcotics Abusers in Indonesia
Abstract
Not only provide benefits for humans, but narcotic substances can also threaten a nation's life if the meaning is misused. There are various forms of narcotics abuse (which by Indonesia is categorized as a crime according to Law Number 35 the Year 2009), one of which is the act of using/consuming narcotics for own self against the law (illegal). The existence of narcotics abusers for themselves opens up opportunities for perpetrators to experience dependence on these substances, commonly referred to as narcotics addicts. The Indonesia Narcotics Law regulates two forms of sanctions for narcotics abusers for themselves, namely criminal sanctions and treatment sanctions in the form of Rehabilitation, which are accommodated in the double-track system model. Through normative legal research methods, this paper will provide an ideal description of the double-track system model in efforts to enforce criminal law for narcotics abusers in Indonesia so that the sentencing model can effectively solve the dependency problem experienced by perpetrators (narcotics addicts) who are in the process of committing crimes—Indonesian criminal justice.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afrizal, R., & Anggunsuri, U. (2019). Optimizing Assessment Process to Drug User Within the Scope of Effective Medical and Social Rehabilitation for Drug Addicts. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.259-268
Arief, B. N. (2011). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru), Cetakan Ke-3 (Ed. Kedua). Jakarta: Kencana.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Tekhnologi. (2016). Arti kata “Asesmen.” KBBI Daring. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/asesmen
Belenko, S., Fagan, J. A., & Dumanovsky, T. (1994). The Effects of Legal Sanctions on Recidivism in Special Drug Courts. Justice System Journal, 17(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/23277556.1994.10871193
Bluth, M. H., & Pincus, M. R. (2016). Narcotic Analgesics and Common Drugs of Abuse: Clinical Correlations and Laboratory Assessment. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 36(4), 603–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2016.07.013
Breen, G. M., & Matusitz, J. (2009). An Updated Examination of the Effects of Illegal Drug Use in the Workplace. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(4), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911350902870183
Fajrin, Y. A., Triwijaya, A. F., & Ma’ruf, M. A. (2020). Double Track System bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Berlatar Belakang Homoseksualitas (Gagasan dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 11(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v11i2.1608
Farrell, A. (2000). Women, Crime and Drugs: Testing the Effect of Therapeutic Communities. Women and Criminal Justice, 11(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v11n01_02
Gerber, R. J., & McAnany, P. D. (1966). Punishment: Current Survey of Philosophy and Law. St. Louis U. L.J., 11, 491.
Hikmawati, P. (2011). Analisis Terhadap Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pengguna Narkotika. Negara Hukum, 2(2), 329–350.
Huda, N., Saefuddin, Y., Gumbira, S. W., & Sumarji, S. (2020). Integrated Assessment: Implementation of Restorative Justice to Countermeasure Drugs Crime in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14(1), 111–124.
Humas BNN. (2020). Press Release Akhir Tahun 2020; “Sikap BNN Tegas, Wujudkan Indonesia Bebas Dari Narkoba.” Badan Narkotika Nasional. https://bnn.go.id/press-release-akhir-tahun-2020/
Irianto, B. Y. (2020). Disparitas Pidana Pada Penyalahguna Narkotika. Jurist-Diction, 3(3), 823. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i3.18625
Laksana, A. W. (2016). Tinjauan Hukum Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika Dengan Sistem Rehabilitasi. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 2(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v2i1.1417
Liu, J., Wu, G., & Boateng, F. D. (2020). Does procedural fairness matter for drug abusers to stop illicit drug use? Testing the applicability of the process-based model in a Chinese context. Psychology, Crime and Law, 26(5), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1696802
Loue, S. (2003). The Criminalization of the Addictions: Toward a Unified Approach. Journal of Legal Medicine, 24(3), 281–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/713832196
Loue, S., & Ioan, B. (2007). Legal and Ethical Issues in Heroin Diagnosis, Treatment, and Research. Journal of Legal Medicine, 28(2), 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947640701357730
Owen, B. (1992). Measuring Success in Prison Drug Programs. Journal of Crime and Justice, 15(1), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.1992.9721454
Rhodes, M. L. (2006). Justice and Mercy: CS Lewis’ Critique of Humanitarian Justice. The Lamp-Post of the Southern California CS Lewis Society, 30(4), 10–14.
Sholehuddin, M. (2004). Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana: Ide Dasar Double Track System & Implementasinya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
von Feuerbach, P. J. A. R. (2007). The Foundations of Criminal Law and the Nullum Crimen Principle. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5(4), 1005–1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm053
Zalewski, W. (2018). Double-Track System in Polish Criminal Law. Political and Criminal Assumptions, History, Contemporary References. Acta Poloniae Historica, 118, 39–59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v10i3.22690 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/citahukum/index
