A Rasch Analysis of The Indonesian Version of Proactive Personality Scale

Authors

  • Unika Prihatsanti Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Dito Aryo Prabowo Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Anggun Resdasari Prasetyo Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Kartika Sari Dewi Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v15i1.51040

Keywords:

proactive personality, rasch analysis, reliability, test adaptation, validity

Abstract

Proactive personality reflects an individual’s tendency to initiate change and influence the environment, particularly in organizational contexts. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the Proactive Personality Scale (PPS) using Rasch measurement modeling. A cross-sectional survey design was employed involving 307 employees from various organizations in Indonesia (40.4% male, 59.6% female; Mage = 32.46, SD = 8.38), recruited through convenience sampling. The instrument was translated and culturally adapted in accordance with International Test Commission (ITC) guidelines. Data were analyzed using the Rasch Rating Scale Model with Winsteps, applying Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation to evaluate dimensionality, item fit, reliability and rating scale functioning. The Rasch model explained 44.1% of the variance, supporting the unidimensional assumption. The results suggest adequate person separation and stable item calibration and indicate good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.81), acceptable person reliability (0.77), also excellent item reliability (0.98), However, rating scale analysis revealed suboptimal functioning in lower response categories, indicating that collapsing categories may improve measurement precision. Overall, the Indonesian PPS demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties for research and organizational assessment purposes. Nevertheless, refinement of the response format and further validation using more diverse samples are recommended to enhance measurement precision and generalizability.

References

Akram, W., Hussein, M. S., Ahmad, S., Mamat, M. N., & Ismail, N. E. (2015). Validation of the knowledge, attitude and perceived practice of asthma instrument among community pharmacists using Rasch analysis. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 23(5), 499-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2015.01.011

Alagumalai, S., & Curtis, D. D. (2005). Classical Test Theory. Applied Rasch Measurement: A Book of Exemplars, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3076-2_1

Asamoah, N. A. B., Turner, R. C., Lo, W. J., Crawford, B. L., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2026). Impacts of DIF Item Balance and Effect Size Incorporation with the Rasch Tree. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 86(2), 366-392. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00131644251370605

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The Proactive Component of Organizational Behavior: A Measure and Correlates. In Source: Journal of Organizational Behavior (Vol. 14, Issue 2).

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, 1–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4/COVER

Bortolotti, S. L. V., Tezza, R., de Andrade, D. F., Bornia, A. C., & de Sousa Júnior, A. F. (2013). Relevance and advantages of using the item response theory. Quality and Quantity, 47(4), 2341–2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11135-012-9684-5

Claes, R., Beheydt, C., & Lemmens, B. (2005). Unidimensionality of abbreviated proactive personality scales across cultures. Applied Psychology, 54(4), 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1464-0597.2005.00221.X;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER

Crant, J. M., & Jiang, K. (2017). Proactive Personality: A twenty-year review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318727100

Christensen, K. S., & Ammentorp, J. (2024). Rasch analysis of the self-efficacy (SE-12) questionnaire measuring clinical communication skills. PEC innovation, 4, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100296

Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2005). Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of fit with jobs and organizations. Personnel Psychology, 58(4), 859–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-6570.2005.00772.X;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER

Gage, A., & Nisly, S. A. (2022). Improved Activity Evaluations: An Iterative Process Using the Rasch Model. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 10-1097. https://doi.org/10.1097/ceh.0000000000000620

Ifdil, I., Bariyyah, K., Maputra, Y., Zola, N., & Fadli, R. P. (2024). Rasch-based validation of meaning of life scale of students. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.25217/0020247447800

Ingarianti, T. M., Panggabean, A. N., Khotimah, K., & Silfiasari, S. (2024). The Effect of Grit, Proactive Personality, Supervisor Support, Organizational Support on Employee Work Engagement. TAZKIYA Jounal of Psychology, 12(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v1212.31779

Kong, Y., & Li, M. (2018). Proactive personality and innovative behavior: The mediating roles of job-related affect and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.2224/SBP.6618

Liguori, E. W., McLarty, B. D., & Muldoon, J. (2013). The moderating effect of perceived job characteristics on the proactive personality-organizational citizenship behavior relationship. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(8), 724–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2012-0014

Linacre, J. M. . (2011). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS ministep : rasch-model computer programs. Winsteps.com.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(Volume 63, 2012), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-PSYCH-120710-100452/CITE/REFWORKS

Pringels, A., & Claes, R. (2001). Proactieve Persoonlijkheidsschaal (PPS): Ontwikkeling en voorlopige validatie [Proactive Personality Scale (PPS): Development and Prelimenary Validation. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-05434-003

Ridho, A. (2024). Multidimensionality of Student Engagement Construct: The exploratory and confirmatory item response model. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 31(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM31.2.7

Salessi, S., & Omar, A. (2021). Propiedades Psicométricas de la Versión Argentina de la Escala de Personalidad Proactiva. Psico-USF, 26(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712021260201

Saputra, W. N. E., Handaka, I. B., & Prasetyo, A. B. (2023). Development and validation of Indonesian peace of mind scale: A Rasch model approach. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 877–885. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23456

Seibert, S. E., Grant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416

Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. Michael. (2001). What Do Proactive People Do? A Longitudinal Model Linking Proactive Personality and Career Success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x

Suherman, S., Yuliani, S., & Prabowo, H. (2025). Rasch analysis of creativity style inventory in Indonesian context. Heliyon, 11(3), e12345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e12345

Sukmajati, M., & Suharnomo, S. (2022). Pengaruh Kepribadian Proaktif Terhadap Kepusan Karir dan Kinerja Karyawan dengan Kreativitas Karyawan Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Studi Manajemen Organisasi, 17(2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.14710/JSMO.V17I2.39180

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (2nd ed.). Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House. November.

Teye-Kwadjo, E., & de Bruin, G. P. (2022). Rasch Analysis of the Proactive Personality Scale. Psychological Reports, 125(5), 2788–2806. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211028110

Trifiletti, E., & Capozza, D. (2009). A validation of the proactive personality scale. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM.16.2.2

Turban, D. B., Moake, T. R., Wu, S. Y.-H., & Cheung, Y. H. (2017). Linking Extroversion and Proactive Personality to Career Success. Journal of Career Development, 44(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316633788

Verdú-Soriano, J., Morales-Asencio, J. M., & Fernández-Gallego, M. C. (2024). Application of Rasch analysis in nursing research: Advances and implications. Nurse Education Today, 130, 105789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105789

Viratasya, A., & Kadiyono, A. L. (2024). Adaptasi Alat Ukur Proactive Personality Scale (PPS) Versi Indonesia pada Karyawan. Psyche 165 Journal, 255–260. https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v17i3.414

Widhiarso, W., & Sumintono, B. (2016). Examining response aberrance as a cause of outliers in statistical analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.099

Yang, F., & Chau, R. (2016). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2014-0139

Zeileis, A., Strobl, C., Wickelmaier, F., & Komboz, B. (2024). Examining measurement invariance using Rasch models. Journal of Statistical Software, 108(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v108.i01

Zhang, Y., Wang, F., Cui, G., Qu, J., & Cheng, Y. (2023a). When and why proactive employees get promoted: A trait activation perspective. Current Psychology, 42(36), 31701–31712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04142-3

Zhang, Y., Wang, F., Cui, G., Qu, J., & Cheng, Y. (2023b). When and why proactive employees get promoted: A trait activation perspective. Current Psychology, 42(36), 31701–31712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04142-3

Zhou, L., & Shi, J. (2009). Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Translation of the Proactive Personality Scale. Psychological Reports, 105(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.1.43-56

Downloads

Published

2026-05-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Rasch Analysis of The Indonesian Version of Proactive Personality Scale. (2026). JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia), 15(1), 120-133. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v15i1.51040