JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
type: channel
description: The Journal of Legal Research {Print ISSN 2715-7172, Online ISSN 2715-7164} is a double-blind, peer-reviewed legal journal and scholarly journal with national and international perspectives, published by Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia. The journal aims to disseminate information and views on matters related to legal research, including developments in case law and legislation, as well as proposals for legal reform from legislative institutions and other relevant institutions or individuals. The journal publishes legal research in various forms, including articles, cases, legislation, notes and commentaries, and book reviews, on themes related to legal research that offer in-depth commentary on Indonesian law and comparative law. The journal is published twice a year. The Journal of Legal Research is strongly committed to responding to and meeting the growing demand among academics, legislators, and legal practitioners in the private and public sectors for a forum that presents authoritative views on legal reform in Indonesia, Asia, and the world. Another related objective is to provide a systematic review of important legal reform initiatives and legal practice. The Journal of Legal Research publishes cutting-edge legal studies from legal academics and practitioners. Founded in 2019, the journal is rooted in the desire to present legal research as a vehicle for national legal reform.
publisher: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
language: en
publication name: JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
issn: 2715-7172
items: Constitutional Disobedience oleh Pembentuk Undang-Undang dan Penegakan Judicial Order
items: Rekonstruksi Regulasi Perlindungan Data Pribadi Berbasis Blockchain Guna Mendukung Transformasi Digital Berdasarkan Teori Perlindungan Hukum
items: Negosiasi Syariat dan Konstitusi: Konfigurasi Politik Hukum Terhadap Formalisasi Hukum Jinayat Aceh
items: Juridical Accountability of Railway Operators for Sexual Harassment on Commuter Trains: A Consumer Protection Perspective in the Jabodetabek Area
items: Telaah Pengkajian Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Dalam Penanganan Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Di Indonesia (Tinjauan Aspek Konseptual Dan Politik Hukum)
items: Pemenuhan Unsur Kepentingan Umum dan Dampaknya Terhadap Hak Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Bandara YIA Kulon Progo
items: Upaya Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online
items: Perjanjian Franchise Antara Mysalon Dan Ratnasari Lukitaningrum (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.493/Pdt/2018/Pt.DKI)
items: Analisis Diversi Dalam Perkara Pidana Anak: Studi Putusan Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Jkt.Brt
items: Tanggung Jawab Hukum Tokopedia Terhadap Konsumen Atas Ketidaksesuaian Barang Dalam Jual Beli Online
items: Efektivitas Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Dalam Menanggulangi Penyebaran Spoiler Film Di Media Sosial Tiktok: Studi Kasus Film Mencuri Raden Saleh
items: Menyoal Efektivitas Asas Erga Omnes Dalam Konsep Eksekutorial Dan Hukum Islam (Studi Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVII/2020)
items: Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Praktik Kartel Pada Industri Minyak Goreng (Studi Putusan Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. Nomor 03/KPPU/2010/PN.Jkt.Pst Jo. Nomor 582k/Pdt.Sus/2011.)
items: Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Agama Terhadap Legal Standing LPKSM Sebagai Penggugat Dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
items: Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemilik Kondominium Atas Pailitnya PT. Dwimas Andalan Bali Sebagai Pengembang
items: Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Dari Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak Akibat Union Busting Analisis Putusan Nomor 229/Pdt.Sus-Phi/2019/Pn.Bdg dan Nomor 436 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020
items: Analisis Yuridis Pemberhentian Sepihak Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1888 K/Pdt/2020
items: Penggunaan Strict Liability Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Secara Perdata Pada Sengketa KLHK Melawan PT. Waringin Agro Jaya
items: Konstruksi Hukum Pembuktian Penuntut Umum Terhadap Sonny Widjaja Dalam Kasus Korupsi PT. ASABRI
items: Problematika Perizinan Penyadapan Oleh KPK Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019
items: Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Ahli Waris Terhadap Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan Terkait Boedel Warisan Atas Harta Bersama Yang Belum Dibagi
items: Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Pihak Penjual Dalam Peralihan Kepemilikan Saham Tanpa Adanya Akta Jual Beli Saham Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris
items: Operasionalisasi Lembaga Wali Amanat Dalam Hukum Pasar Modal Yang Mengadopsi Struktur Trust Beserta Kedudukan Hukumnya Dalam Hukum Perdata Indonesia
items: Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Konsumen Selaku Pembeli Beritikad Baik Terhadap Pembelian Properti Jenis Apartemen Yang Pembangunan Tidak Terealisasi
items: Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Legalisasi Dokumen Warga Negara Asing Berdasarkan Penerapan Aksesi Apostille Convention
items: Position of the Tax Court Under the State Administrative Court
items: The Impact of the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Revocation of Authority of the Prosecutor submits a Judicial Review
items: Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Terkait Hutang Piutang Yang Obyeknya Sedang Dalam Jaminan
items: PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI (FULL DISCLOSURE) DALAM PROSES IPO PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19
items: Efektivitas BPJS Kesehatan Sebagai Syarat Dalam Proses Jual Beli Tanah Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Akta Jual Beli

Constitutional Disobedience oleh Pembentuk Undang-Undang dan Penegakan Judicial Order
type: item
description: The Constitutional Court has the authority embedded by the constitution regarding the examination of laws against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI) 1945 whose decisions are final and binding. The authority aims to ensure that a norm in the law remains in compliance with the values in the constitution. Therefore, it is appropriate for the law-making body as the addresat of the Constitutional Court's decision to follow up on the decision in the legislative process. However, in practice, there is often non-compliance by law making institutions with the Constitutional Court Decision. The non-compliance with the Constitutional Court's Decision is rooted in the legislative process by the lawmaking body that contradicts the contents of the decision. This paper aims to analyse the idea of judicial order enforcement in realising the compliance of law making institutions in following up the Constitutional Court Decision. This research uses a normative juridical research method through a conceptual approach to identify these problems. The results of this study conclude that, first, there are several factors that cause the non-compliance of the legislative body with the Constitutional Court Decision and the absence of sanctions against the legislative body that does not comply with the Constitutional Court Decision. Secondly, it discusses the legal implications of the non-compliance of law making institutions with the Constitutional Court Decision. Third, offering a judicial order solution to the Constitutional Court Decision by affirming expressis verbis the clause to include the Constitutional Court Decision, which is a source of law in the lawmaking process.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Constitutional Court Decision
  topic: keywords
subject: Constitutional Disobedience
  topic: keywords
subject: Judicial Order
  topic: keywords
subject: Adressat Institution
  topic: keywords
creator: Wahyu Indra Triyadi
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Wahyu Indra Triyadi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2026-01-25
publication date: 2026-01-25
starting page: 221
ending page: 250
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v7i2.50113

Rekonstruksi Regulasi Perlindungan Data Pribadi Berbasis Blockchain Guna Mendukung Transformasi Digital Berdasarkan Teori Perlindungan Hukum
type: item
description: Digital transformation advancements support the development of digitalization in Indonesia to realize Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, this is not spread from rampant cases of data leakage due to the absence of institutions of personal data protection and the regulation certainty to regulates the mechanism protection of public data. Overlapping regulations between the institutions create legal loopholes, so that handling by the government cannot be applied optimally. Besides that, the minimum od the technology mechanism in management of personal data protection also contributes to the problem. The objective of this study is to propose a solution highlighting the necessity for clearer regulations in the implementation of blockchain-based data protection mechanisms in Indonesia, through a comparative analysis with the mechanisms applied in the European Union. The research method used id normative juridical method conceptual approach, comparative approach, and statutory approach. The result of this research concluded that the absence of the personal data protection institutions and the overlapping regulation resulting in the prevalence of the data leakage cases in Indonesia. Therefore, required the reconstruction of the personal data protection regulation and the urgency establishment of personal data protections institution with blockchain-based to provide legal protection for every society.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Digital Transformation
  topic: keywords
subject: Protection Data
  topic: keywords
subject: Blockchain
  topic: keywords
creator: Reisya Thalita Nurmeyanka
creator: Kumala Dian Pangesti
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Reisya Thalita Nurmeyanka, Kumala Dian Pangesti https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2026-01-25
publication date: 2026-01-25
starting page: 173
ending page: 190
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v7i2.49931

Negosiasi Syariat dan Konstitusi: Konfigurasi Politik Hukum Terhadap Formalisasi Hukum Jinayat Aceh
type: item
description: This article examines the formalization of Jinayat law in Aceh within the relationship between Islamic law and the Indonesian constitution by positioning it as a product of legal-political negotiation in the post-conflict Aceh context. Using a qualitative method with a historical-normative approach, this study analyzes constitutional provisions, statutory regulations on Aceh’s special autonomy, Jinayat qanun, and relevant socio-political dynamics following the Aceh conflict. The findings demonstrate that the formalization of Jinayat law was shaped by a responsive legal-political configuration after the Reform era, functioning not merely as the execution of constitutional mandates but also as a political instrument for conflict resolution, democratization, and national integration. By mapping the interaction between central and regional political interests, religious authority, and local socio-cultural legitimacy, the study shows that Jinayat law emerged through negotiation rather than unilateral constitutional enforcement. The novelty of this research lies in its argument that the Jinayat legal regime in Aceh represents a form of responsive legal politics, where constitutional recognition of regional special status intersects with pragmatic political considerations in post-conflict governance. This study contributes to political-legal scholarship by offering a nuanced understanding of Islamic law formalization as a dynamic constitutional and political process that must remain aligned with democratic principles and constitutional values.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Jinayat Law
  topic: keywords
subject: Legal Politics
  topic: keywords
subject: Aceh Special Autonomy
  topic: keywords
subject: Constitution
  topic: keywords
creator: M. Ridho Ilahi
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 M. Ridho Ilahi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2026-01-25
publication date: 2026-01-25
starting page: 191
ending page: 206
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v7i2.50126

Juridical Accountability of Railway Operators for Sexual Harassment on Commuter Trains: A Consumer Protection Perspective in the Jabodetabek Area
type: item
description: This study examines the legal settlement of sexual harassment cases on Electric Rail Trains (KRL) in the Jabodetabek area by focusing on the juridical responsibility of PT Kereta Commuter Indonesia as a public transportation service provider from a consumer protection perspective. This research employs a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach, analyzing statutory regulations, particularly Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes, Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, and railway service regulations. The study finds that although PT Kereta Commuter Indonesia has implemented various preventive measures, such as women-only carriages, surveillance systems, and reporting mechanisms, these efforts are not accompanied by compensatory accountability for victims. In practice, victims of sexual harassment do not receive restitution, compensation, or health assistance, either from perpetrators or from the service provider, as mandated under Article 19 of the Consumer Protection Law. This research argues that sexual harassment on public transportation should not be viewed solely as a criminal offense but also as a violation of consumer rights that triggers the liability of business actors.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Sexual Harassment
  topic: keywords
subject: Electric Rail Train
  topic: keywords
subject: Consumer Protection
  topic: keywords
creator: Ria Safitri
creator: Kamilania
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Ria Safitri, Kamilania https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2026-01-25
publication date: 2026-01-25
starting page: 127
ending page: 148
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v7i2.50111

Telaah Pengkajian Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Dalam Penanganan Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Di Indonesia (Tinjauan Aspek Konseptual Dan Politik Hukum)
type: item
description: This article examines the effectiveness of Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 on Jinayat Law in addressing sexual violence cases by focusing on its conceptual framework and legal-political orientation. Using a qualitative method with statute and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes the structure of criminal sanctions under the Qanun, its position within Indonesia’s plural legal system, and its implementation in the context of Aceh’s asymmetric decentralization. The study finds that although the Jinayat Qanun reflects a strong political will to institutionalize Islamic criminal law as a form of regional legal identity, its effectiveness in reducing sexual violence remains limited. This limitation is evident in the predominance of retributive punishment, such as caning and imprisonment, without adequate integration of victim protection mechanisms, restitution, and perpetrator rehabilitation. By situating the Qanun within broader debates on legal politics and criminal justice policy, this research demonstrates that punitive approaches alone are insufficient to address the complex social realities of sexual violence. The novelty of this article lies in its evaluative argument that the Jinayat Qanun represents a legal-political model of punishment that prioritizes symbolic deterrence over substantive justice for victims.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Sexual Violence
  topic: keywords
subject: Criminal Act
  topic: keywords
subject: Qanun Jinayat
  topic: keywords
creator: Fitha Ayun Lutvia Nitha
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Fitha Ayun Lutvia Nitha https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2026-01-25
publication date: 2026-01-25
starting page: 207
ending page: 220
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v7i2.49930

Pemenuhan Unsur Kepentingan Umum dan Dampaknya Terhadap Hak Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Bandara YIA Kulon Progo
type: item
description: The development of Yogyakarta International Airport (YIA) in Kulon Progo Regency is a National Strategic Project aimed at promoting economic growth and improving the quality of public infrastructure. However, the land acquisition process for this development has triggered significant social conflicts at the local community level. This study analyzes the fulfillment of the public interest criterion in the YIA project, its impact on the protection of the rights of affected communities, and the dynamics of agrarian conflict that emerged, using a socio-legal approach. The findings indicate that although, normatively, the development of YIA complies with the provisions of Law Number 2 of 2012 on Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest, its implementation has not fully aligned with the principles of justice, humanity, and participation. The limited involvement of communities in decision-making processes, discrepancies in compensation mechanisms, and the use of consignment as a dispute resolution instrument have contributed to polarization between community groups that support and oppose the project. Agrarian conflicts have been further exacerbated by inconsistencies in spatial planning policies and the loss of residents’ agrarian livelihoods, reflecting unequal power relations between the state and society as explained in Marx’s conflict theory and the concept of agrarian dispossession. This study emphasizes the importance of transparency, fair compensation, and inclusive public participation to ensure that infrastructure development does not generate structural injustice and that its benefits are distributed equitably.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Yogyakarta International Airport
  topic: keywords
subject: Land Acquisition
  topic: keywords
subject: Public Interest
  topic: keywords
subject: Compensation
  topic: keywords
subject: Social Conflict
  topic: keywords
creator: Neti Hasiah
creator: Stephanie Tiara Christina
creator: Tsabita Husna Fauziah
creator: Tsabita Zukhrufi Islamiya
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Neti Hasiah, Stephanie Tiara Christina, Tsabita Husna Fauziah, Tsabita Zukhrufi Islamiya https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2026-01-25
publication date: 2026-01-25
starting page: 149
ending page: 172
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v7i2.49288

Upaya Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online
type: item
description: Online gambling is one form of cybercrime and represents a persistent social problem that has proven difficult to eradicate across generations. This study aims to analyze the legal framework regulating online gambling offenses and the efforts undertaken by the Kuningan Police in combating such crimes. The research employs a juridical-empirical method, using both the statute approach and the case approach to examine relevant legal norms and their practical implementation. The findings show that the regulation of online gambling is stipulated in the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP). The Kuningan Police’s efforts to address online gambling include conducting community outreach programs, cooperating with local village officials, and performing routine patrols. However, the study also identifies several obstacles that hinder effective law enforcement, such as limited public awareness, difficulties in tracing online offenders, and insufficient coordination among law enforcement institutions. Consequently, the role of the police in handling online gambling cases remains less effective, highlighting the need for stronger inter-agency cooperation and enhanced technological capacity to counter this evolving form of cybercrime.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Police
  topic: keywords
subject: Crime
  topic: keywords
subject: Gambling
  topic: keywords
subject: Online Gambling
  topic: keywords
creator: Diky Hikmatul Fittra
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Diky Hikmatul Fittra https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 41
ending page: 60
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v7i1.46862

Perjanjian Franchise Antara Mysalon Dan Ratnasari Lukitaningrum (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.493/Pdt/2018/Pt.DKI)
type: item
description: This study analyzes the breach of contract (wanprestatie) committed by a franchisee in executing the agreement established with the franchisor. The research adopts a statute approach combined with an analytical approach to examine the relevant legal provisions and their practical implications. The findings indicate that RL, as the franchisee, failed to fulfill contractual obligations under the agreement with MYSalon, the franchisor. Initially, MYSalon demonstrated good faith by summoning the franchisee and offering an opportunity to settle outstanding payment obligations. However, the franchisee refused to comply and instead unilaterally closed the MYSalon outlet under their management while filing a lawsuit before the South Jakarta District Court. To prevent the franchisor’s claim from becoming illusory and to ensure compensation for material losses, the franchisor requested the court to impose a conservatory attachment (conservatoir beslag) on all movable assets, equipment, and furniture owned by the franchisee across all managed outlets. Furthermore, the franchisor petitioned the court to prohibit the franchisee from using the MYSalon name and trademark, which legally belong to the franchisor.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Franchise
  topic: keywords
subject: Breach of Contract
  topic: keywords
subject: Court Decision
  topic: keywords
creator: Rahmat Ivan Shabriansyah
creator: Abu Tamrin
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Rahmat Ivan Shabriansyah, Abu Tamrin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 19
ending page: 40
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v7i1.46861

Analisis Diversi Dalam Perkara Pidana Anak: Studi Putusan Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Jkt.Brt
type: item
description: Prosedur dan proses diversi dalam kasus pencurian dengan pemberatan oleh anak serta penerapan hukum dan pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Jkt.Brt tidak sepenuhnya sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. Studi ini menggunakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014, serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 65 Tahun 2015. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa dalam perkara ini, Jaksa Penuntut Umum menerapkan dakwaan subsidiar dengan Pasal 365 ayat (2) butir 1 dan 2 KUHP atau Pasal 363 ayat (1) butir 4 KUHP, dan hakim menjatuhkan putusan pidana penjara 1 bulan 15 hari kepada anak pelaku. Meskipun diversi telah dilakukan dan mencapai kesepakatan damai, hakim tetap melanjutkan proses peradilan hingga vonis dijatuhkan, yang bertentangan dengan prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam sistem peradilan anak. Rekomendasi yang diusulkan mencakup penguatan regulasi terkait diversi, termasuk ketentuan tempat pelaksanaannya serta sanksi bagi aparat hukum yang tidak menerapkannya dengan baik. Sistem peradilan pidana anak perlu lebih mengedepankan prinsip perlindungan anak dan restorative justice agar tidak ada lagi pemidanaan yang tidak diperlukan bagi anak yang telah berhasil mencapai kesepakatan damai melalui mekanisme diversi.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Legal Protection
  topic: keywords
subject: Children
  topic: keywords
subject: Robbery
  topic: keywords
subject: Diversion
  topic: keywords
subject: The Judge's Consideration
  topic: keywords
creator: Indah Khairunnisa
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-04-16
publication date: 2025-04-16
starting page: 291
ending page: 312
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.28925

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Tokopedia Terhadap Konsumen Atas Ketidaksesuaian Barang Dalam Jual Beli Online
type: item
description: This study discusses Tokopedia's legal responsibility towards consumers for non-conformity of goods in online sales transactions. Although regulations regarding electronic commerce have been established, there are still weaknesses in consumer legal protection. Consumers often experience losses due to goods received that do not match the description without receiving proper compensation. This study uses a normative-empirical method with a regulatory-statutory approach and case studies to analyze Tokopedia's responsibility and legal protection for consumers in electronic transactions. The study results indicate that the available settlement mechanisms, such as online dispute resolution, have not fully provided justice for consumers. Tokopedia, as a platform provider, is responsible for ensuring that consumer rights are protected and providing more effective settlement solutions. In addition, consumer legal awareness of their rights in electronic transactions is still low, so they are willing to take their position in dealing with sales with sellers. This study highlights the need to strengthen regulations and implement more effective consumer legal protection in the e-commerce ecosystem. An active role is needed from the government and e-commerce platforms to ensure a transparent complaint mechanism supporting consumer protection to create a safer and fairer digital trade ecosystem.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Consumer Protection
  topic: keywords
subject: Consumers
  topic: keywords
subject: Online Sales.
  topic: keywords
creator: Zahra Rahmawati
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-16
publication date: 2025-04-16
starting page: 253
ending page: 290
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.22618

Efektivitas Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Dalam Menanggulangi Penyebaran Spoiler Film Di Media Sosial Tiktok: Studi Kasus Film Mencuri Raden Saleh
type: item
description: The effectiveness of the Copyright Law in dealing with the practice of spreading movie spoilers on TikTok social media, with a case study of the film Mencuri Raden Saleh. The phenomenon of movie spoilers on social media is a problem that impacts the economic and moral rights of creators of cinematographic works. This study uses a sociological, legal approach to understand the interaction of society with applicable legal norms. The study results indicate that TikTok's policies are not yet in line with copyright protection regulations in Indonesia, so copyright infringement in the form of spoilers and film piracy is still difficult to control. Although Law Number 28 of 2014 has provided legal protection for copyright holders, its implementation is still hampered by the nature of the complaint offense, which requires copyright owners to file a report first so that the legal process can run. In addition, the low public legal awareness of copyright is also a significant factor in the rampant practice of movie piracy on social media. Therefore, a more comprehensive regulatory update is needed, as increased supervision of digital platforms and wider socialization to raise public awareness of the importance of copyright protection in the digital era.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Movie Spoilers
  topic: keywords
subject: TikTok
  topic: keywords
subject: Cinematographic Works
  topic: keywords
subject: Copyright.
  topic: keywords
creator: Syahrul Yaumil
creator: Nahrowi Nahrowi
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-16
publication date: 2025-04-16
starting page: 223
ending page: 252
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.33541

Menyoal Efektivitas Asas Erga Omnes Dalam Konsep Eksekutorial Dan Hukum Islam (Studi Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVII/2020)
type: item
description: The validity of the erga omnes principle is reflected in the provision stating that the Constitutional Court's decision can be implemented directly without any consideration of the decision of the relevant authorized official unless other regulations and laws regulate it. This provision reflects the binding legal force and comprehensive nature (between parties), which generally applies to the parties to the case. Problems arise when the Constitutional Court's decision is not implemented by the parties to the case, state institutions, state administrators, and related parties for various reasons. This research is a normative legal research with secondary data. The results of the study show that the logistical consequences of the erga omnes principle, which requires all levels of citizens to implement the decision, impact parties with various interests so that they feel disadvantaged. In a situation like this, the parties can no longer take other legal measures except to obey and comply with the punishment.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Erga omnes Principle
  topic: keywords
subject: Constitutional Court
  topic: keywords
subject: Implementation of Decisions.
  topic: keywords
creator: Rizki Armanda
creator: Atep Abdurrofiq
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-16
publication date: 2025-04-16
starting page: 205
ending page: 222
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.38573

Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Praktik Kartel Pada Industri Minyak Goreng (Studi Putusan Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. Nomor 03/KPPU/2010/PN.Jkt.Pst Jo. Nomor 582k/Pdt.Sus/2011.)
type: item
description: This study aims to examine the application of indirect evidence in handling cartel practices in the cooking oil industry, focusing on a case study of Decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. No.03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST Jo. Number 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. The research method used is the juridical-normative approach, which relies on legal sources such as laws and regulations, legal principles, norms, principles, and expert opinions to analyze the issues studied. In the KPPU decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) stated that 21 cooking oil producers were proven to have practiced cartels. However, business actors applied with the Central Jakarta District Court, which then overturned the decision through Decision No. 03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST. The cancellation was based on the consideration that KPPU only relied on analysis, theories, and definitions considered speculative and not supported by substantial evidence. KPPU then filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court rejected the appeal and upheld the settlement of the first-level court through Decision No. 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. This study also highlights that challenges in indirect evidence can be overcome by implementing a leniency program, as has been implemented in various countries. This program incentivizes parties involved in the cartel to disclose information to the competition authority.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Indirect Evidence
  topic: keywords
subject: Cooking Oil Cartel Practices
  topic: keywords
subject: Leniency Program.
  topic: keywords
creator: Rafa'any Darajatanti Ulya
creator: Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
creator: Indra Rahmatullah
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-16
publication date: 2025-04-16
starting page: 177
ending page: 204
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.17788

Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Agama Terhadap Legal Standing LPKSM Sebagai Penggugat Dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
type: item
description: The inconsistency of decisions regarding the legal standing of the Community-Based Consumer Protection Institution (LPKSM) in the Sharia economic court case at the Religious Court has created legal defenders. There are differences of opinion between judges regarding the legal standing of LPKSM as the Plaintiff in this settlement. This study aims to examine the position of LPKSM in the trial at the Religious Court and analyze various decisions that show this disparity. Through a qualitative literature approach, the study concludes that the law grants LPKSM the right to sue with specific requirements. LPKSM cannot act as an advocate representing consumers directly because it contradicts Law Number 18 of 2013. The differences in court decisions regarding the legal standing of LPKSM mainly depend on considerations regarding the interests fought for by the institution. To overcome the disparity in decisions and create legal certainty, a special formulation is needed to be used as a guideline in reconstructing the sharia economy. LPKSM who wish to become a party in a Sharia economic case must meet formal and material requirements, namely being a legal entity or foundation, having Articles of Association, being registered with the Consumer Protection Agency Registration Certificate (TDLP), and fighting for public interests, not individual interests. With clear standards, it is hoped that legal certainty can be created in handling Sharia economic settlements involving LPKSM in the Religious Court.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Disparity
  topic: keywords
subject: LPKSM
  topic: keywords
subject: Legal Status
  topic: keywords
subject: Decision
  topic: keywords
subject: Religious Court.
  topic: keywords
creator: Putri Alifia
creator: Muhammad Mujibur Rohman
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-16
publication date: 2025-04-16
starting page: 145
ending page: 176
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.34500

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemilik Kondominium Atas Pailitnya PT. Dwimas Andalan Bali Sebagai Pengembang
type: item
description: The bankruptcy of a developer company often directly impacts condominium owners who have made a sale and purchase transaction, in the case of the bankruptcy of PT. Dwimas Andalan Bali condominium owners experience legal protection because the units that have been purchased are included in the bankruptcy estate. This study analyzes the developer's responsibility towards consumers in bankruptcy conditions and the legal status of condominium objects that are part of the bankrupt assets. The method used is normative legal research with a case approach focusing on the Supreme Court Decision Number 437 K / Pdt. Sus-Pailit / 2019. The study results show that in bankruptcy conditions, developers still have legal obligations to consumers who have fulfilled their achievements in the sale and purchase transaction. Based on Article 36 of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, consumers have the right to submit a request to the curator to ensure the process of extending condominium ownership rights to the Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB) stage. Consumers are entitled to compensation or damages if these obligations are not met. In the case of developer bankruptcy, consumer rights must still be protected through available legal mechanisms, either through an application to the curator or other legal efforts. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen legal protection for consumers so that they are not harmed in bankruptcy-related property transactions.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Bankruptcy
  topic: keywords
subject: Condominium
  topic: keywords
subject: Legal Protection
  topic: keywords
subject: Property Developer
  topic: keywords
creator: Kiasnabila Mulyawan
creator: Ismail Hasani
creator: Faris Satria Alam
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-15
publication date: 2025-04-15
starting page: 65
ending page: 90
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.33232

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Dari Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak Akibat Union Busting Analisis Putusan Nomor 229/Pdt.Sus-Phi/2019/Pn.Bdg dan Nomor 436 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020
type: item
description: Unilateral termination of employment due to union-busting practices is a serious problem in industrial relations in Indonesia. This study analyzes legal protection for workers against unilateral termination of employment due to union busting, referring to the Industrial Relations Court (PHI) Decision Number 229/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN.Bdg and the Supreme Court Decision Number 436 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020. This study uses a normative juridical method with a case approach, a regulatory approach, and data collection techniques through literature studies. The results of the study indicate that PT. Asmo Indonesia (PT. Denso Manufacturing) is predicted to have carried out union-busting practices by unilaterally terminating the employment of the union chairman without going through the bipartite and tripartite mechanisms by the provisions of the regulations. Although there are indications of violations of the right to associate as regulated in Law Number 21 of 2000, the courts at the PHI and cassation levels do not explicitly summarize the practice of union busting in their legal considerations. Unilateral termination of employment of active workers in trade unions can be charged as an unlawful act. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen legal protection for workers to prevent discriminatory and repressive actions by employers against freedom of association. In addition, judges in industrial relations cases need to consider more comprehensively the aspects of Human Rights and the principle of justice in every decision related to employment.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Unilateral Termination of Employment
  topic: keywords
subject: Union Busting
  topic: keywords
subject: Trade Unions
  topic: keywords
creator: Amalia Sofa Izza
creator: Abdullah Sulaiman
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-15
publication date: 2025-04-15
starting page: 91
ending page: 118
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.32484

Analisis Yuridis Pemberhentian Sepihak Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1888 K/Pdt/2020
type: item
description: Legal protection against unilateral termination of the direction of a Limited Liability Company (PT) through a General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is an important issue, as seen in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1888 K/Pdt/2020. This study analyzes legal protection as a direction terminated without clear reasons and the opportunity to defend itself. This study uses normative legal research with a case and regulatory approach. The results of the study show that the unilateral termination of the directors of PT Multi Daya Wonua was carried out verbally without a strong legal basis, so it is contrary to Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, especially Article 105 which stipulates that directors must be allowed to defend themselves before being dismissed. Although the court ruled that the GMS has the authority to dismiss, the decision did not consider aspects of justice and the right of direction. This can be justified as an unlawful act. Directors who are unlawfully terminated are entitled to legal protection in the form of cancellation of the GMS decision or compensation according to the remaining term of office. Therefore, fairer law enforcement and stronger protection for the direction are needed to prevent arbitrary actions in the management of PT.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Unilateral Dismissal
  topic: keywords
subject: Board of Directors
  topic: keywords
subject: Limited Liability Company
  topic: keywords
subject: General Meeting of Shareholders
  topic: keywords
subject: Legal Protection
  topic: keywords
creator: Erica Dwi Syabrina
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-15
publication date: 2025-04-15
starting page: 119
ending page: 144
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.32093

Penggunaan Strict Liability Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Secara Perdata Pada Sengketa KLHK Melawan PT. Waringin Agro Jaya
type: item
description: The right to access a good and healthy environment is a right for all citizens guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution. The right to obtain a good and healthy environment is not only limited by the rights of the current generation but also a right that future generations can feel with pro-environment sustainable development. The state's right to sue the central government through the Ministry of Environment and Forestry is an effort to protect the environment from polluters and/or environmental destroyers, one of which is filing a civil lawsuit. This research is a normative or doctrinal legal research with a statute, conceptual, and case approach. This study concludes that the legal liability carried out by PT Waringin Agro Jaya can be justified based on strict liability because, in principle, strict liability is a liability without fault in every business or activity categorized as Abnormally Dangerous Activity.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Civil Liability
  topic: keywords
subject: Absolute Liability
  topic: keywords
subject: Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
  topic: keywords
creator: Denis Kurniawan
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-15
publication date: 2025-04-15
starting page: 1
ending page: 22
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.39129

Konstruksi Hukum Pembuktian Penuntut Umum Terhadap Sonny Widjaja Dalam Kasus Korupsi PT. ASABRI
type: item
description: Evidence is crucial to the criminal process, especially in corruption cases. This study analyzes the strength of the evidence presented by the Public Prosecutor in the corruption case of the reconstruction of investment funds of PT. ASABRI with Sonny Widjaja's response. The focus of this study is to assess the extent to which the evidence meets the elements of a crime as regulated in Article 2, paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. This study uses a normative method with a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach. The study results indicate that the Public Prosecutor proved the elements unlawful, enriching oneself or others and causing losses to state finances with a loss value of Rp22.78 trillion. The evidence was carried out through five main pieces of evidence, namely witness statements, expert statements, letters, statements from prostitutes, and clues, including electronic evidence. The Panel of Judges accepted the evidence and declared the perpetrator guilty based on the primary charge, thus imposing a prison sentence of 18 years and a fine of Rp750 million. This study confirms that a strong evidentiary strategy by the Public Prosecutor plays an essential role in shaping the judge's conviction and upholding justice in large-scale corruption cases.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Evidence
  topic: keywords
subject: Corruption
  topic: keywords
subject: PT. ASABRI
  topic: keywords
creator: Jihan Fadila
creator: Alfitra Alfitra
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-15
publication date: 2025-04-15
starting page: 41
ending page: 64
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.40666

Problematika Perizinan Penyadapan Oleh KPK Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019
type: item
description: The revision process of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law resulted in structural changes with the formation of the KPK Supervisory Board. This change impacts the work procedures of KPK investigators, especially in conducting wiretapping of corruption suspects. This article analyzes the problematic issues of wiretapping permits by the KPK after the revision of Law Number 19 of 2019, which introduced a multi-layered bureaucracy. This study uses a normative legal method with statutory regulations. The results of the study indicate that the revision of the law requires the KPK to obtain permission from the Supervisory Board before conducting wiretapping, which has the potential to hinder the effectiveness and speed of investigations. However, after a judicial review was conducted at the Constitutional Court, it was decided that wiretapping could be carried out without permission from the Supervisory Board but must still be notified within a specific period. This decision is measured as a positive step in maintaining a balance between the effectiveness of corruption eradication and the accountability of the KPK institution.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Wiring
  topic: keywords
subject: Supervisory Board
  topic: keywords
subject: Bureaucracy
  topic: keywords
subject: Corruption Eradication
  topic: keywords
creator: Andi Nur Rachman
creator: Mujar Ibnu Syarif
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH
date: 2025-04-15
publication date: 2025-04-15
starting page: 23
ending page: 40
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.22068

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Ahli Waris Terhadap Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan Terkait Boedel Warisan Atas Harta Bersama Yang Belum Dibagi
type: item
description: Dalam pasal 833 ayat (1) KUHPerdata ditentukan bahwa ahli waris dengan sendirinya karena hukum memperoleh hak milik atas segala barang, segala hak dan segala piutang dari si pewaris. Fenomena dalam masyarakat banyak terjadi harta warisan (boedel warisan) yang belum dibagi tetapi telah dipergunakan sebagai jaminan dalam fasilitas kredit dari bank, tanpa persetujuan ahli waris yang lain. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian hukum kepustakaan atau data sekunder dengan sumber bahan-bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akibat hukum pembebanan hak tanggungan atas boedel warisan harta bersama yang belum dibagi yaitu tetap sah apabila dalam pelaksaan pembebanan hak tanggungan tersebut melalui persetujuan dari seluruh ahli waris. Namun apabila tanpa persetujuan seluruh ahli waris, maka pembebanan hak tanggungan tersebut batal demi hukum, tidak sah, serta tidak berkekuatan hukum karena dalam pembebanan tersebut merupakan perbuatan melawan hukum karena pemberi hak tanggungan tidak mempunyai kewenangan yang mutlak atas objek hak tanggugan yang dijaminkan. Adapun perlindungan hukum bagi ahli waris terhadap pembebanan hak tanggungan atas boedel warisan harta bersama yang belum dibagi yaitu dilakukan pemisahan dan pembagian terlebih dahulu, namun apabila pemisahan dan pembagian belum dapat dilakukan, maka sebelum melakukan pembebanan hak tanggungan terlebih dahulu meminta persetujuan dari seluruh ahli waris. Sedangkan apabila pembebanan hak tanggungan atas boedel warisanyang belum dibagi tanpa adanya persetujuan ahli waris, maka ahli waris berhak untuk mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan dengan dalih bahwa ia tidak pernah memberikan persetujuannya untuk menjaminkan boedel warisan tersebut, sehingga hak ahli waris dikembalikan seperti semula.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Perlindungan Hukum
  topic: keywords
subject: Ahli Waris
  topic: keywords
subject: Hak Tanggungan
  topic: keywords
subject: Boedel Warisan
  topic: keywords
creator: Muhammad Amin Fauzi
creator: Yusuf Ausiandra
creator: Felicitas Sri Marniati
rights: Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 83
ending page: 112
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v4i6.30495

Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Pihak Penjual Dalam Peralihan Kepemilikan Saham Tanpa Adanya Akta Jual Beli Saham Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris
type: item
description: Dalam penelitian ini digunakan teori kepastian hukum yang dikemukakan Gustav Von Radburch, yang menyatakan kepastian hukum "that law should be certain, that it could not be interpreted and applied in one way today and in another tomorrow, in one way here and in another way there.” Yang artinya (Hukum itu harus pasti, bahwa itu tidak dapat ditafsirkan dan diterapkan dalam satu cara hari ini dan dengan cara lain besok, dalam satu cara di sini dan dengan cara lain di sana). Jenis Penelitian yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu penelitian hukum yuridis normatif, dimana penelitian hukum yuridis normatif adalah penelitian hukum yang dilakukan secara meneliti bahan Pustaka atau data sekunder saja. Penelitian ini disebut juga dengan penelitian hukum kepustakaan. Sedangkan yang menjadi hasil dari penelitian ini adalah agar dalam pembentukan maupun perbaikan peraturan terkait jual beli saham mengharuskan dibuatnya akta pemindahan hak termasuk jual beli saham, agar dibuat dengan akta otentik yang dibuat oleh pejabat yang berwenang melakukan pembuatan akta otentik yaitu Notaris, guna meminimalisir terjadinya sengketa dalam jual beli saham akibat akta/perjanjian yang dibuat adalah akta/perjanjian yang dibuat dengan akta dibawah tangan.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Jual beli
  topic: keywords
subject: Saham
  topic: keywords
subject: Notaris
  topic: keywords
creator: Septirita Wilman
creator: Joko Sriwidodo
creator: Yurisa Martanti
rights: Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 47
ending page: 68
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v4i6.30496

Operasionalisasi Lembaga Wali Amanat Dalam Hukum Pasar Modal Yang Mengadopsi Struktur Trust Beserta Kedudukan Hukumnya Dalam Hukum Perdata Indonesia
type: item
description: Pertemuan suatu system hukum dapat dilakukan dengan cara adopsi system hokum. Adopsi adalah masuknya pranata hukum asing yang mempunyai system hukum yang berbeda merujuk pada perpindahan norma-norma hukum atau ketentuan hukum tertentu dari suatu Negara tertentu ke Negara lain selama suatu proses pembuatan hukum. Dalam tulisan ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normative. Adapaun yang menjadi pembahasan dalam tulisan ini adalah menegenai mekanisme/ struktur trust sebagaimana dikenal dalam sistem hukum Anglo Saxon serta juga membahas mengenai operasioanalisasi lembaga wali amanat dalam hukum pasar modal Indonesia. Dalam tulisan ini, penulis menemukan bahwa Sistem Hukum Anglo Saxon merupakan suatu sistem hukum yang didasarkan pada yurispudensi. Globalisasi mengakibatkan masuknya pranata ekonomi dan hukum asing ke dalam suatu negara yang memiliki sistem hukum yang berbeda, yaitu masuknya lembaga hukum yang hanya ada pada system Common Law ke Indonesia yang menganut sistem hukum Civil Law yang dalam pelaksanaannya seringkali menimbulkan benturan.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Wali Amanat
  topic: keywords
subject: Trust
  topic: keywords
subject: Pasar Modal
  topic: keywords
creator: Yulli Wahyunie Rizal
creator: DU Dhody A.R. Widjajaatmadja
creator: Yusuf Ausiandra
rights: Copyright (c) 2022 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 49
ending page: 82
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v4i6.29280

Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Konsumen Selaku Pembeli Beritikad Baik Terhadap Pembelian Properti Jenis Apartemen Yang Pembangunan Tidak Terealisasi
type: item
description: Pengembang selaku pelaku usaha bidang Real Estat jenis apartemen, hubungan hukum antara pengembang dan pembeli berdasarkan perjanjian Surat Pesanan unit apartemen, pengembang telah melakukan wanprestasi atas perjanjian yaitu tidak realisasi pembangunan apartemen sesuai waktu yang dijanjikan, hal tersebut sudah menjadi fenomena hukum di Indonesia. Berdasarkan uraian dalam penulisan ini, maka permasalahan yang dikemukakan dalam tesis ini adalah 1) bagaimana akibat hukum dari perjanjian Surat Pesanan unit apartemen bagi para pihak terhadap pengembang yang melakukan wanprestasi? 2) Bagaimana bentuk perlindungan hukum yang dapat diperoleh pembeli atas tidak terealisasinya pembangunan apartemen. Dari hasil penelitian normatif yang dianalisa secara kualitatif ini dapat diperoleh bentuk akibat hukum atas tindakan wanprestasi oleh pengembang dan bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli. Solusi kongkrit dari pengembang saat ini untuk penyelesaian permasalahan adalah relokasi unit, maka harus mencarikan solusi terkait tuntutan pengembalian uang, denda dan ganti rugi kepada pembeli yang tidak memiliki kejelasan pembayaran kepada pembeli dan belum ada upaya untuk memperoleh perlindungan hukum yang dijamin oleh undang-undang, karena kurang edukasi dan literasi pembeli sehingga sangat diperlukan peran dan perhatian pemerintah, agar eksistensi lembaga pemerintahan dan non pemerintahan dalam penyelesaian masalah bagi pembeli yang dirugikan.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Perjanjian
  topic: keywords
subject: Perlindungan Hukum
  topic: keywords
subject: Wanprestasi
  topic: keywords
creator: Agung Suria Darma
creator: Dhody AR Widjajaatmadja
creator: Basuki Basuki
rights: Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 21
ending page: 46
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v4i6.30497

Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Legalisasi Dokumen Warga Negara Asing Berdasarkan Penerapan Aksesi Apostille Convention
type: item
description: Konvensi Apostille digunakan untuk melakukan penghapusan terhadap syarat legalisasi pada dokumen publik untuk memfasilitasi penggunaan dokumen publik di luar negeri. Indonesia telah menjadi Negara Pihak (State party) pada Konvensi Apostille tersebut, maka setiap negara dapat mempersingkat proses legalisasi tanpa perlu melibatkan kanal diplomatik, melainkan langsung melalui Otoritas Kompeten masing-masing Negara Pihak. Pada saat ini proses legalisasi di Indonesia, yang membutuhkan legalisasi dokumen publik untuk digunakan di negara lain membutuhkan pengesahan oleh kantor publik lokal atau Notaris, maka diperlukan legalisasi lain dari Kemenkumham. Setelah, dokumen yang telah disahkan oleh Kemenkumham, setempat, kemudian akan dilegalisasi lagi oleh Kementerian Luar Negeri Negara masing-masing. Selanjutnya, sebelum dokumen yang akan digunakan di Negara tujuan, dokumen perlu dilegalisasi ulang oleh Kedutaan Besar atau Konsulat Jenderal masing-masing ke negara yang akan dituju. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif, dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normative. Adapun yang menjadi masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai 1) Bagaimana Urgensi Indonesia dalam Mengaksesi Legalisasi Dokumen Publik berdasarkan Konvensi Apostille? 2) Bagaimana Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Proses Legalisasi Dokumen berdasarkan Konvensi Apostille di Indonesia?. hasil dari penelitian ini adalah penulis ingin menjelaskan mengenai bahwa notaris memiliki peran dan tanggungjawab terhadap proses legalisasi dokumen ini dan tentu saja hal-hal seperti ini sangat penting dan sudah di atur dalam undang-undang dan aturan-aturan yang berlaku di Indonesia.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Konvensi Apostille
  topic: keywords
subject: Legalisasi Dokumen
  topic: keywords
subject: Tanggung Jawab Notaris
  topic: keywords
creator: Zulfia Sabila
creator: Yuhelson Yuhelson
creator: Felicitas Sri Marniati
rights: Copyright (c) 2022 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 1
ending page: 20
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v4i6.29281

Position of the Tax Court Under the State Administrative Court
type: item
description: The Tax Court in Indonesia is within the State Administrative Court (PTUN), facing the complexity of tax disputes that require careful and accurate handling. This research explores the position of the Tax Court within the PTUN framework, highlighting the challenges and opportunities faced in dealing with changes in tax laws and regulations. This study seeks to analyze the impact of changes in statutory regulations on the Tax Court and identify strategies to enhance the effectiveness and quality of Tax Court decisions in addressing tax dynamics. This study employs qualitative methods and a legal and scholarly approach. The relevant literature and pertinent laws and regulations are analyzed to understand the issues discussed thoroughly. The research findings indicate that the Tax Court, as an integral part of the PTUN, confronts complex challenges stemming from alterations to tax laws. This study identifies opportunities for enhancing judge training, employing information technology, and collaborating closely with tax agencies. In addressing these obstacles, the Tax Court can ensure equitable, accurate, and consistent decisions, preserve the integrity of the tax justice system, and cultivate public confidence.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Tax Court
  topic: keywords
subject: Administrative Court
  topic: keywords
subject: Position
  topic: keywords
creator: RR Dewi Anggraeni
rights: Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 41
ending page: 70
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v5i1.35403

The Impact of the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Revocation of Authority of the Prosecutor submits a Judicial Review
type: item
description: The right to justice, and human rights more generally, requires the filing of a judicial review (PK) in Indonesia. A judicial review (PK) can be requested by an individual who believes that his rights have been infringed or that the court's judgment is incorrect. The cassation decision can be challenged in court by either the convicted person or the prosecution if they believe it violates basic principles of fairness and legal certainty. However, the Constitutional Court can in its decision revoke the prosecutor's authority to submit a judicial review (PK) because it is considered contrary to human rights, especially in terms of recognition, guarantees, protection and fair legal certainty and equal treatment before the law. This study used a qualitative research method with a statutory and literature approach. The results of the study stated that it was very important for the prosecutor to have the right to submit a judicial review (PK) on the cassation decision of the Supreme Court which was deemed not to have fulfilled legal certainty and justice for the victim and the state. If this is omitted, it will cripple law enforcement. The reason for submission, guarantee, protection and legal certainty for the convict cannot be fully recognized, because there are still rights to guarantee, protection and legal certainty for the victim and the people of Indonesia which must also be maintained and respected.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Keywords
  topic: keywords
subject: Attorney
  topic: keywords
subject: Review (PK)
  topic: keywords
subject: Deletion
  topic: keywords
creator: Nur Rohim Yunus
creator: Suhendar Suhendar
creator: Annissa Rezki
rights: Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 21
ending page: 40
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v5i1.31993

Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Terkait Hutang Piutang Yang Obyeknya Sedang Dalam Jaminan
type: item
description: Campur tangan hukum dalam kehidupan manusia di dalam masyarakat semakin luas. Efektivitas penerapan hukum menjadi semakin penting untuk dipertimbangkan. Teori penyelesaian sengketa dalam penelitian ini merupakan teori yang mengkaji dan menganalisis tentang kategori atau penggolongan sengketa atau pertentangan yang timbul dalam masyarakat, faktor penyebab terjadinya sengketa dan cara-cara atau strategi yang digunakan untuk mengakhiri sengketa tersebut. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Metode Yuridis Normatif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah bagaimana mengetahui tentang penyelesaian sengketa peralihan hak atas tanah secara sepihak oleh kreditur yang sedang dalam jaminan dan juga mengetahui tentang kepastian hukum terkait peralihan hak atas tanah yang didasari perjanjian hutang piutang. Kata Kunci: Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah, Hutang Piutang, Obyek Sedang Dalam Jaminan
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject:
  topic: subjects
creator: Ryanto Sirait
creator: Wira Franciska
creator: Felicitas Sri Marniati
rights: Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 1
ending page: 20
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v5i1.31946

PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI (FULL DISCLOSURE) DALAM PROSES IPO PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19
type: item
description: The background of this research issue is based on the importance of information disclosure to companies that conduct public offerings in the capital market as a determinant for investors to make decisions because the Covid-19 pandemic is one of the extraordinary events that greatly affect several sectors, one of which is in the capital market. This thesis aims to review the fulfillment of the principle of information disclosure in the IPO (Initial Public Offering) process during the Covid-19 pandemic. This research is library research, examines the momentum that is happening at this time and relates the prevailing laws and regulations to support research. The analysis method used is normative juridical by using statute approach, as well as conceptual approach. In this study using three main legal materials used, namely, the primary legal material consists of Law No. 8 of 1995 on Capital Market, Law No. 8 of 1995 on Capital Market, Law No. 21 of 2011 on Financial Services Authority, and Bapepam Regulation Number IX.A.2 on Registration Procedures in the Framework of Public Offerings. The results showed that OJK issued several regulations for the capital market sector due to the Covid-19 pandemic that had an impact on companies and investors, but OJK has not issued specific regulations for the application of information disclosure principles in the IPO process during the pandemic so that there are still existing regulations related.
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject: Full Disclosure
  topic: keywords
subject: Initial Public Offering
  topic: keywords
subject: Covid-19.
  topic: keywords
creator: Nanda Vita Reka Amiruddin
creator: Soefyanto Soefyanto
creator: Irfan Khairul Umam
rights: Copyright (c) 2022 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 101
ending page: 122
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v4i6.21900

Efektivitas BPJS Kesehatan Sebagai Syarat Dalam Proses Jual Beli Tanah Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Akta Jual Beli
type: item
description: Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) adalah badan hukum yang dibentuk dengan Undang-Undang untuk menyelenggarakan perogram jaminan sosial. BPJS menurut UU Nomor 40 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional adalah trasformasi dari badan penyelenggara jaminan sosial yang sekarang telah berjalan dan dimungkinkan untuk membentuk badan penyelenggara baru sesuai dengan dinamika perkembangnan jaminan sosial. BPJS Kesehatan adalah badan hukum publik menurut UU BPJS. Terkait dengan Inpres Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 yang tersiar akan berlaku mulai 1 Maret 2022, kartu BPJS kesehatan menjadi syarat untuk melakukan transaksi jual beli tanah dan rumah. Syarat baru itu diperuntukkan masyarakat yang ingin melakukan transaksi jual beli tanah di Kementerian ATR/ BPN Nomor HR 02/ 152-400/11/2022. Terkait dengan Inpres Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 yang tersiar akan berlaku mulai 1 Maret 2022, kartu BPJS kesehatan menjadi syarat untuk melakukan transaksi jual beli tanah dan rumah. Syarat baru itu diperuntukkan masyarakat yang ingin melakukan transaksi jual beli tanah di Kementerian ATR/ BPN Nomor HR 02/ 152-400/11/2022. Dalam tulisan ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Untuk memperoleh data yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini dipergunakan teknik pengumpulan penelitian kepustakaan atau studi dokumen dipelajari bahan-bahan hukum yang merupakan data sekunder. Pertama dihimpun semua peraturan-peraturan yang berkaitan dengan hukum yang menjadi objek penelitian, dan selanjutnya dari bahan-bahan tersebut dipilih doktrin, ketentuan-ketentuan lainnya. Hasil yang diperoleh disusun dalam sebuah kerangka sistematis, sehingga akan memudahkan dalam melaksanakan analisis terhadap permasalahan penelitian ini. Kata Kunci: BPJS, Jual Beli Tanak, Akta Jual Beli
subject: Articles
  topic: section
subject:
  topic: subjects
creator: Khalida Galuh Fauzia
creator: Ramlani Lina Sinaulan
creator: Erny Kencanawati
rights: Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
date: 2025-10-14
publication date: 2025-10-14
starting page: 85
ending page: 100
doi: 10.15408/jlr.v5i1.30942